2000 Legg Mason Tennis Classic – Doubles

Doubles
	2000 Legg Mason Tennis Classic
Champions	Alex O'Brien; Jared Palmer
Runners-up	Andre Agassi; Sargis Sargsian
Final score	7–5, 6–1

Justin Gimelstob and Sébastien Lareau were the defending champions, but none competed this year.

Alex O'Brien and Jared Palmer won the title by defeating Andre Agassi and Sargis Sargsian 7–5, 6–1 in the final.

Seeds

The top four seeds receive a bye into the second round.

Alex O'Brien / Jared Palmer (Champions)
Donald Johnson / Piet Norval (Quarterfinals)
Martin Damm / Dominik Hrbatý (Second round)
Byron Black / Scott Humphries (Second round)
Andrei Olhovskiy / David Prinosil (First round)
Wayne Arthurs / Nenad Zimonjić (Semifinals)
Peter Nyborg / Cyril Suk (First round, retired due to a back injury on Nyborg)
Chris Haggard / Tom Vanhoudt (First round)

Draw

Key

Finals

Semifinals					Final


1	Alex O'Brien Jared Palmer	1	6	6

6	Wayne Arthurs Nenad Zimonjić	6	3	4
					1	Alex O'Brien Jared Palmer	7	6

					WC	Andre Agassi Sargis Sargsian	5	1
	Thomas Shimada Myles Wakefield	4	6⁴

WC	Andre Agassi Sargis Sargsian	6	7⁷

Top Half

First Round					Second Round					Quarterfinals					Semifinals


					1	A O'Brien J Palmer	7	6
	P Kovačka P Kudrnáč	6⁵	6	3		J Coetzee B Haygarth	5	3
	J Coetzee B Haygarth	7⁷	2	6						1	A O'Brien J Palmer	6⁴	6	6
	M Ondruska M Sprengelmeyer	7⁷	3	6							M Ondruska M Sprengelmeyer	7⁷	2	1
	P Rosner J Weir-Smith	6⁵	6	3		M Ondruska M Sprengelmeyer	6	7⁷
Q	G Coria F González	7	6		Q	G Coria F González	3	6⁴
8	C Haggard T Vanhoudt	5	1												1	A O'Brien J Palmer	1	6	6
															6	W Arthurs N Zimonjić	6	3	4
					4	B Black S Humphries	6	4	2
	B Bryan M Bryan	6	6			B Bryan M Bryan	1	6	6
	D Bowen J Thomas	1	4								B Bryan M Bryan	3	6⁵
	P Goldstein C Woodruff	4	6	3						6	W Arthurs N Zimonjić	6	7⁷
	A Prieto A Simoni	6	3	6		A Prieto A Simoni	1	6²
WC	P Harsanyi P Osuna	2	3		6	W Arthurs N Zimonjić	6	7⁷
6	W Arthurs N Zimonjić	6	6

Bottom Half

First Round					Second Round					Quarterfinals					Semifinals

5	A Olhovskiy D Prinosil	3	4
	T Shimada M Wakefield	6	6			T Shimada M Wakefield	6	5	6
WC	L Harper-Griffith A Roddick	7⁷	2	7	WC	L Harper-Griffith A Roddick	4	7	4
	B Coupe J Williams	6⁵	6	5							T Shimada M Wakefield	w/o
WC	À Corretja N Kiefer	7	6							WC	À Corretja N Kiefer
Q	J Golmard R Schüttler	5	3		WC	À Corretja N Kiefer	1	6	6
					3	M Damm D Hrbatý	6	2	2
																T Shimada M Wakefield	4	6⁴
7	P Nyborg C Suk	5^r													WC	A Agassi S Sargsian	6	7⁷
WC	A Agassi S Sargsian	4			WC	A Agassi S Sargsian	w/o
	J Robichaud K Spencer	6⁷	5			A Gaudenzi I Ljubičić
	A Gaudenzi I Ljubičić	7⁹	7							WC	A Agassi S Sargsian	1	6	6
	J Boutter F Santoro	1	6	4						2	D Johnson P Norval	6	3	3
	L Burgsmüller E Ran	6	3	6		L Burgsmüller E Ran	6	2	6²
					2	D Johnson P Norval	4	6	7⁷

gollark: Perhaps we are HIGHLY smart unlike random internet people and OBVIOUSLY picked the correct® answer, or perhaps we just hold similar philosophical/intellectual/whatever views which make us more inclined to one-box.

gollark: I mean, maybe the average internet rabble is just bad at understanding what "perfect prediction" means, but you could probably argue that it's "rational" at the time of choosing to take both, even if it's... acausally...? worse for you. Nobody here appears to have.

gollark: It's paradoxical because it breaks decision theories somewhat.

gollark: That's kind of the point of the paradox?

gollark: Yes, all versions of it have that.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.