1999 US Open – Women's Doubles Qualifying
Women's Doubles Qualifying | |
---|---|
1999 US Open |
Seeds
Eugenia Kulikovskaya / Sandra Načuk (First Round) Jelena Kostanić / Tatiana Poutchek (Qualifiers) Sandra Cacic / Maureen Drake (Qualifiers) Rosa María Andrés Rodríguez / Mariam Ramon Climent (First Round) Rita Kuti-Kis / Marlene Weingärtner (First Round) Lindsay Lee / Vanessa Webb (Qualifiers) Jana Kandarr / Samantha Reeves (Qualifying Competition) Magda Mihalache / Bryanne Stewart (First Round)
Qualifiers
Lindsay Lee / Vanessa Webb Jelena Kostanić / Tatiana Poutchek Sandra Cacic / Maureen Drake Svetlana Krivencheva / Maja Murić
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
First Qualifier
First Round | Qualifying Competition | ||||||||||||
1 | ![]() ![]() | 64 | 4 | ||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 77 | 6 | |||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | 63 | ||||||||||
6 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 6 | 77 | |||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 69 | 4 | ||||||||||
6 | ![]() ![]() | 711 | 6 | ||||||||||
Second Qualifier
First Round | Qualifying Competition | ||||||||||||
2 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 | ||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 5 | 1 | ||||||||||
2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||
7 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 4 | ||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 7 | 4 | |||||||||
7 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 5 | 6 | |||||||||
Third Qualifier
First Round | Qualifying Competition | ||||||||||||
3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 3 | 2 | |||||||||||
3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 63 | 7 | |||||||||
![]() ![]() | 1 | 77 | 5 | ||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 66 | 6 | 7 | ||||||||||
5 | ![]() ![]() | 78 | 2 | 5 | |||||||||
Fourth Qualifier
First Round | Qualifying Competition | ||||||||||||
4 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 3 | ||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 68 | 3 | ||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 1 | 710 | 6 | ||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||
8 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 3 | ||||||||||
gollark: If you *do* go around using a definition which admits stars and everything else, it's basically meaningless, but ends up bringing all the weird things English ties to "life" and "organisms" along with it anywya.
gollark: Which are mostly for some specific technical context and make sense there. Because it's a hard to define word.
gollark: The broader issue is that when people say stuff like that they generally mean to sneak in a bunch of connotations which are dragged along with "organism" or "life".
gollark: You could *maybe* stretch that to extend to *all* humans, but *also* probably-not-organism things like stars, which also reproduce (ish), process things into usable energy (ish), sort of respond to stimuli for very broad definitions of stimuli, maintain a balance between radiation pressure and gravity, and grow (ish).
gollark: Individual humans are "organisms" by any sensible definition, inasmuch as they... reproduce, think, maintain homeostasis, grow, respond to stimuli, process inputs into usable energy and whatever.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.