1996 U.S. Men's Clay Court Championships – Doubles

Todd Woodbridge and Mark Woodforde were the defending champions but did not compete that year.

Doubles
1996 U.S. Men's Clay Court Championships
Champions Pat Cash
Patrick Rafter
Runners-up Ken Flach
David Wheaton
Final score6–2, 6–3

Pat Cash and Patrick Rafter won in the final 6–2, 6–3 against Ken Flach and David Wheaton.

Seeds

Champion seeds are indicated in bold text while text in italics indicates the round in which those seeds were eliminated.

  1. Alex O'Brien / Sandon Stolle (Semifinals)
  2. Jonas Björkman / Nicklas Kulti (First Round)
  3. Brian MacPhie / Michael Tebbutt (First Round)
  4. Kent Kinnear / Dave Randall (First Round)

Draw

Key
First Round Quarterfinals Semifinals Final
1 A O'Brien
S Stolle 		6 6 7
  G Raoux
C Woodruff 		1 7 6 1 A O'Brien
S Stolle 		6 5 6
WC M Joyce
D Witt 		3 6 5   R Smith
J Winnink 		1 7 3
  R Smith
J Winnink 		6 4 7 1 A O'Brien
S Stolle 		6 6 4
3 B MacPhie
M Tebbutt 		4 5     K Flach
D Wheaton 		3 7 6
  L Jensen
D Johnson 		6 7     L Jensen
D Johnson 		7 6 6
  K Flach
D Wheaton 		6 6     K Flach
D Wheaton 		5 7 7
WC D Caldwell
C Clark 		3 3     K Flach
D Wheaton 		2 3  
  J Palmer
R Reneberg 		3 6 7   P Cash
P Rafter 		6 6  
WC V Spadea
J Stoltenberg 		6 3 6   J Palmer
R Reneberg 		6 3  
Q B Garnett
T.J. Middleton 		7 6   Q B Garnett
T.J. Middleton 		7 6  
4 K Kinnear
D Randall 		5 3   Q B Garnett
T.J. Middleton 		4 3  
  B Behrens
B Haygarth 		6 4     P Cash
P Rafter 		6 6  
  P Cash
P Rafter 		7 6     P Cash
P Rafter 		6 6 6
  J Frana
K Jones 		4 6 6   J Frana
K Jones 		3 7 2
2 J Björkman
N Kulti 		6 4 4
gollark: Oh, and to respond very late to this:> uh... why would you buy those things = it's a pretty generic componentI don't mean why those specific things, I mean why suddenly buy a bunch of solar hardware?
gollark: ***a*** is pretty unambiguously a bold/italicized a, but if you start shoving asterisks mid-word some stuff gets confused.
gollark: I think it's not even unambiguous, given weirdness with having a bunch of `*`s together.
gollark: It's also nightmarish to parse.
gollark: Markdown is a horrible mess compatibility-wise because the original wasn't really standardized at all, so implementations were just based off a buggy Perl program, and *now* we have standards but there are a ton of different ones with mutual incompatibilities, and some applications randomly have or don't have some features.

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.