1996 Nokia Open – Doubles
Claudia Porwik and Linda Wild were the defending champions but did not compete that year.
Doubles | |
---|---|
1996 Salem Open Beijing and the Nokia Open | |
1995 Champions | ![]() ![]() |
Champions | ![]() ![]() |
Runners-up | ![]() ![]() |
Final score | 7–5, 6–4 |
Seeds | 4 |
Naoko Kijimuta and Miho Saeki lost in the final 7–5, 6–4 against Yuko Hosoki and Kazue Takuma.
Seeds
Champion seeds are indicated in bold text while text in italics indicates the round in which those seeds were eliminated.
Rika Hiraki / Nana Miyagi (First Round) Sung-Hee Park / Shi-Ting Wang (Semifinals) Naoko Kijimuta / Miho Saeki (Champions) Silke Meier / Louise Pleming (Quarterfinals)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ![]() ![]() | 5 | 6 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 7 | 3 | 7 | ![]() ![]() | 5 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 3 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 77 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | ![]() ![]() | 77 | 7 | ![]() ![]() | 63 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 63 | 5 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 2 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 5 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 3 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 3 | 78 | 4 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 66 | 6 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 4 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 5 | 6 | 6 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 6 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 7 | 4 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 2 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 6 | 2 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||
2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 4 | 6 |
gollark: > @a russian spy tools like static analysers and valgrind?Those are something. But languages which are safe and do not permit such errors in the first place are arguably better.
gollark: Bags of holding *do* sound like good bags.
gollark: Did you read what I said about that?
gollark: Now, yes, you can say "but programmers should just be perfect all the time and not make mistakes", but that is very stupid because people make mistakes and good tools make those more obvious/make it harder to.
gollark: C's lack of safety got us Heartbleed, quite notably, and a ridiculously large amount of other bugs.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.