1996 Danamon Open – Doubles
Claudia Porwik and Irina Spîrlea were the defending champions but did not compete that year.
Doubles | |
---|---|
1996 Danamon Open | |
Champions | ![]() ![]() |
Runners-up | ![]() ![]() |
Final score | 7–6, 7–5 |
Draw | 16 |
Seeds | 4 |
Rika Hiraki and Naoko Kijimuta won in the final 7–6, 7–5 against Laurence Courtois and Nancy Feber.
Seeds
Champion seeds are indicated in bold text while text in italics indicates the round in which those seeds were eliminated.
Kerry-Anne Guse / Kristine Radford (Semifinals) Yayuk Basuki / Linda Wild (Semifinals) Laurence Courtois / Nancy Feber (Final) Karin Kschwendt / Rene Simpson (First Round)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 5 | 4 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Q | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | Q | ![]() ![]() | 5 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 3 | 4 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 4 | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 2 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 5 | 6 | 6 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 7 | 3 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 4 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | w/o | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 4 | 4 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 0 | 6 | 1 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 4 | 6 |
gollark: My problem isn't *that* (5G apparently has improvements for more normal frequencies anyway), but that higher bandwidth and lower latency just... isn't that useful and worth the large amount of money for most phone users.
gollark: Personally I think 5G is pointless and overhyped, but eh.
gollark: It's a house using some sort of sci-fi-looking engines to take off, superimposed on the text "5G", with "London," and "is in the house." above and below it respectively.
gollark: Well, computer viruses can.
gollark: Ah yes, of course, different wireless communication standards being phased in create viruses, makes sense.
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.