1996 CA-TennisTrophy – Doubles
Ellis Ferreira and Jan Siemerink were the defending champions but lost in the quarterfinals to David Prinosil and Michael Stich.
Doubles | |
---|---|
1996 CA-TennisTrophy | |
Champions | ![]() ![]() |
Runners-up | ![]() ![]() |
Final score | 7–6, 6–4 |
Yevgeny Kafelnikov and Daniel Vacek won in the final 7–6, 6–4 against Menno Oosting and Pavel Vízner.
Seeds
Jacco Eltingh / Paul Haarhuis (First Round) Yevgeny Kafelnikov / Daniel Vacek (Champions) Ellis Ferreira / Jan Siemerink (Quarterfinals) Libor Pimek / Byron Talbot (Quarterfinals)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | WC | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 | 5 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 3 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 5 | 7 | 7 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | ![]() ![]() | 5 | 6 | 7 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 7 | 4 | 6 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 7 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 1 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Q | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 2 | WC | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
LL | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 4 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | WC | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | 6 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 7 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 7 | 4 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 2 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 | 3 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||
2 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 7 | 6 |
gollark: They need to be able to operate independently of the network, or everything will go horribly wrong if they go into a tunnel, or there's a temporary outage.
gollark: Honestly it doesn't seem useful for *that*, either.
gollark: I can see it being used for specialty applications like that, sure, but it does *not* seem useful in a generic router-type device.
gollark: It honestly seems mostly pointless though, given that it doesn't go through walls and apparently works at roughly... cable ranges.
gollark: I've never heard it called WiFi type C, I thought it was just 802.11ad or something.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.