1995 Internazionali Femminili di Palermo – Singles

Irina Spîrlea was the defending champion and won in the final 7–6, 6–2 against Sabine Hack.

Singles
1995 Internazionali Femminili di Palermo
1994 Champion Irina Spîrlea
Champion Irina Spîrlea
Runner-up Sabine Hack
Final score7–6, 6–2

Seeds

A champion seed is indicated in bold text while text in italics indicates the round in which that seed was eliminated.

  1. Karina Habšudová (Quarterfinals)
  2. Irina Spîrlea (Champion)
  3. Sandra Cecchini (First Round)
  4. Barbara Rittner (First Round)
  5. Sabine Hack (Final)
  6. Silvia Farina (Quarterfinals)
  7. Natalia Medvedeva (Semifinals)
  8. Virginia Ruano-Pascual (First Round)

Draw

Key
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals Final
1 K Habšudová 6 6  
  S Dopfer 2 3   1 K Habšudová 6 7  
  J Kandarr 6 7     J Kandarr 3 6  
LL K de Weille 1 5   1 K Habšudová 6 4 3
  P Langrová 6 7   7 N Medvedeva 3 6 6
  N Dahlman 4 5     P Langrová 2 2  
  K Kschwendt 5 4   7 N Medvedeva 6 6  
7 N Medvedeva 7 6   7 N Medvedeva 6 4 2
4 B Rittner 3 0 r 5 S Hack 4 6 6
LL J Lee 6 1   LL J Lee 2 3  
  F Perfetti 6 6     F Perfetti 6 6  
WC L Garrone 2 1     F Perfetti 3 0  
WC M Weingärtner 3 0   5 S Hack 6 6  
Q A Canepa 6 6   Q A Canepa 2 4  
  S Ramón-Cortés 2 1   5 S Hack 6 6  
5 S Hack 6 6   5 Sabine Hack 6 2  
8 V Ruano-Pascual 4 3   2 Irina Spîrlea 7 6  
  V Martinek 6 6     V Martinek 6 6  
  R Bobková 6 6     R Bobková 4 4  
  G Casoni 1 4     V Martinek 3 1  
  P Schwarz 3 6 7   B Schett 6 6  
Q G Dondit 6 2 6   P Schwarz 3 1  
  B Schett 6 3 6   B Schett 6 6  
3 S Cecchini 1 6 4   B Schett 3 1  
6 S Farina 6 6 7 2 I Spîrlea 6 6  
  N Ávila Bonastre 7 4 6 6 S Farina 6 6  
  K Studeníková 3 5   Q F Lubiani 1 4  
Q F Lubiani 6 7   6 S Farina 6 2 6
  B Paulus 6 5 6 2 I Spîrlea 4 6 7
Q S Talaja 3 7 2   B Paulus 4 2  
  S Meier 0 3   2 I Spîrlea 6 6  
2 I Spîrlea 6 6  
gollark: I agree. We must destroy all bailouts and also monopolies. Only then will they be somewhat efficient.
gollark: The American system seems to generally be a mess, and I doubt you can pin it on one thing.
gollark: What, in *number* or *pay* or what?
gollark: I don't think you can just point at that as a final answer. What is that graph even showing growth in? Why is competition not creating an incentive to get rid of useless administrators? *Is* there even much competition?
gollark: I think the point is more that it's a system which mostly works well and has produced lots of nice things.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.