1994 Crimean referendum

A three-part referendum was held in Crimea on 27 March 1994 alongside regional and national elections. Voters were asked whether they were in favour of greater autonomy within Ukraine, whether residents should have dual Russian and Ukrainian citizenship, and whether presidential decrees should have the status of laws. All three proposals were approved.[1]

This article is part of a series on the
politics and government of Crimea
Autonomous Republic of Crimea /
Republic of Crimea

Republic of Crimea (within Russia) since 2014

Autonomous Republic of Crimea (within Ukraine)
See also
Political status of Crimea
Politics of Russia
Politics of Ukraine

Background

On 5 May 1992 the Crimean Supreme Council declared independence, dependent on a referendum that was planned for August. However, the Ukrainian Parliament ruled that the declaration was illegal, and gave the Supreme Council a deadline of 20 May to rescind it. Although the Supreme Council complied with the order on 22 May, the referendum was only postponed rather than cancelled.[1]

The referendum idea was resurrected in 1994 after Yuriy Meshkov was elected President of Crimea in January. Although the Central Election Commission of Ukraine and Ukrainian President Leonid Kravchuk declared it illegal, it still went ahead.[1]

Results

Greater autonomy

Are you for the restoration of the provision of the Constitution of the Republic of Crimea of 6 May 1992 which determines the regulation of mutual relations between the Republic of Crimea and Ukraine on the basis of a Treaty of Agreements?[2]

Choice Votes %
For78.4
Against21.6
Invalid/blank votes–
Total100
Registered voters/turnout
Source: Minorities at Risk Project

Dual citizenship

Are you for the restoration of the provision of the Constitution of the Republic of Crimea of 6 May 1992 that proclaimed the right of citizens of the Republic of Crimea to dual citizenship?[2]

Choice Votes %
For82.8
Against17.2
Invalid/blank votes–
Total100
Registered voters/turnout
Source: Minorities at Risk Project

Edicts of the president to become laws

Are you for conceding the force of laws to the edicts of the president of the Republic of Crimea on questions that are temporarily not regulated by legislation of the Republic of Crimea?[2]

Choice Votes %
For77.9
Against22.1
Invalid/blank votes–
Total100
Registered voters/turnout
Source: Minorities at Risk Project
gollark: Socialism is a monoid in the category of endofunctors, actually.
gollark: Arguably, you're not really helping by helping propagate a big politically motivated data leak then.
gollark: I don't think that's a very good state of affairs.
gollark: Also, it's 15GB and that would take a while.
gollark: I don't see why I would be, I use a different company for my domains and stuff.

References
  1. Chronology for Crimean Tatars in Ukraine Archived 2014-03-01 at Archive.today Minorities at Risk Project
  2. Mark Clarence Walker (2003) The Strategic Use of Referendums: Power, Legitimacy, and Democracy, Palgrave Macmillan, p108
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.