1992–93 Latvian Hockey League season
The 1992–93 Latvian Hockey League season was the second season of the Latvian Hockey League, the top level of ice hockey in Latvia. Fifteen teams participated in the league, and Pārdaugava Riga won the championship.
| 1992–93 Latvian Hockey League | |
|---|---|
| League | Latvian Hockey Higher League |
| Sport | Ice hockey |
| Number of teams | 15 |
| Regular season | |
| Champions | Pārdaugava Riga |
| Runners-up | Latvijas zelts Riga |
Regular season
Group A
| Club | GP | W | T | L | GF:GA | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | RTU-Hanza Riga | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 86:22 | 12 |
| 2. | HK Sāga Ķekava Riga | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 95:23 | 9 |
| 3. | Dinamo Juniors Riga | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 71:14 | 9 |
| 4. | Essamika Ogre | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 53:36 | 6 |
| 5. | LJS-Hanza Riga | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 28:61 | 4 |
| 6. | Vecmeistars Riga | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 26:73 | 2 |
| 7. | Polaks Engure | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 14:144 | 0 |
Group B
| Club | GP | W | T | L | GF:GA | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Pārdaugava Riga | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 123:20 | 11 |
| 2. | Pārdaugava Riga II | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 75:37 | 11 |
| 3. | Latvijas zelts Riga | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 114:24 | 11 |
| 4. | HK Nik's Brih Riga | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 80:31 | 10 |
| 5. | HK Valmiera | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 32:91 | 6 |
| 6. | THK Talsi | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 40:120 | 4 |
| 7. | Dispeceri Riga | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 27:89 | 3 |
| 8. | Smiltenes vanagi | 7 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 8:87 | 0 |
Second round
Final round
| Club | GP | W | T | L | GF:GA | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Pārdaugava Riga | 21 | 16 | 2 | 3 | 175:67 | 34 |
| 2. | Latvijas zelts Riga | 21 | 15 | 2 | 4 | 194:101 | 32 |
| 3. | Pārdaugava Riga II | 21 | 15 | 2 | 4 | 161:125 | 32 |
| 4. | HK Nik's Brih Riga | 21 | 13 | 0 | 8 | 170:113 | 26 |
| 5. | HK Sāga Ķekava Riga | 21 | 9 | 1 | 11 | 158:169 | 19 |
| 6. | RTU-Hanza Riga | 21 | 7 | 0 | 14 | 114:195 | 14 |
| 7. | Dinamo Juniors Riga | 21 | 3 | 1 | 17 | 74:165 | 7 |
| 8. | Essamika Ogre | 21 | 2 | 0 | 19 | 102:213 | 4 |
Placing round
| Club | GP | W | T | L | GF:GA | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Vecmeistars Riga | 14 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 112:139 | 19 |
| 2. | HK Valmiera | 15 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 111:157 | 19 |
| 3. | LJS-Hanza Riga | 14 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 91:111 | 18 |
| 4. | THK Talsi | 15 | 8 | 1 | 6 | 119:193 | 17 |
| 5. | Dispeceri Riga | 15 | 7 | 1 | 7 | 103:164 | 15 |
| 6. | Smiltenes vanagi | 15 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 69:157 | 11 |
| 7. | Polaks Engure | 14 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 61:235 | 3 |
gollark: > I never tried it. It's nice that it has these safety features but I prefer C++ still. > If I want to be sure that my program is free of bugs, I can write a formal specification and do a > correctness proof with the hoare calculus in some theorem proofer (People did that for the seL4 microkernel, which is free from bugs under some assumptions and used in satellites, nuclear power plants and such)Didn't doing that for seL4 require several hundred thousand lines of proof code?
gollark: Most countries have insanely convoluted tax law so I assume it's possible.
gollark: Hmm, so you need to obtain a hypercomputer of some sort to write your tax forms such that they cannot plausibly be checked?
gollark: What if it's somehow really easy to find *a* solution to something, but not specific ones, and hard to check the validity of a specific maybe-solution? Is that possible?
gollark: Er, maybe?
External links
| Seasons | |
|---|---|
| Current teams |
|
| Former teams |
|
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.