1989–90 Campionato Sammarinese di Calcio
The 1989–90 Campionato Sammarinese di Calcio season was the 5th season since its establishment. It was contested by 10 teams, and S.P. La Fiorita won the championship.
Season | 1989–90 |
---|---|
Champions | S.P. La Fiorita |
← 1988–89 1990–91 → |
Regular season
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Qualification or relegation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | S.P. La Fiorita | 18 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 37 | 14 | +23 | 29 | Qualification for the championship play–offs |
2 | S.P. Tre Fiori | 18 | 7 | 11 | 0 | 30 | 21 | +9 | 25 | |
3 | S.P. Domagnano | 18 | 8 | 7 | 3 | 25 | 18 | +7 | 23 | |
4 | A.C. Libertas | 18 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 32 | 21 | +11 | 22 | |
5 | S.S. Murata | 18 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 30 | 24 | +6 | 20 | |
6 | S.S. Folgore/Falciano | 18 | 5 | 9 | 4 | 20 | 14 | +6 | 19 | |
7 | S.C. Faetano | 18 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 31 | 23 | +8 | 16 | |
8 | S.S. Virtus | 18 | 5 | 3 | 10 | 22 | 32 | −10 | 13 | |
9 | G.S. Dogana | 18 | 2 | 3 | 13 | 23 | 44 | −21 | 7 | Relegation to the Serie A2 |
10 | S.P. Cailungo | 18 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 13 | 66 | −53 | 2 |
Source: rsssf.com
Championship playoff
First round
- F.C. Domagnano 2-2 (pen 4-6) A.C. Libertas
- S.S. Montevito 0-1 S.S. Cosmos
Second round
- F.C. Domagnano 1-0 S.S. Montevito
- A.C. Libertas 2-1 S.S. Cosmos
Third round
- F.C. Domagnano 1-2 S.S. Cosmos
- A.C. Libertas 1-1 (pen 6-4) S.P. Tre Fiori
Fourth round
- S.S. Cosmos 1-1 (pen 5-4) S.P. Tre Fiori
- S.P. La Fiorita 4-0 A.C. Libertas
Semifinal
Final
gollark: Anyway, I have, I think, reasonably strong "no genocide" ethics. But I don't know if, in a situation where everyone seemed implicitly/explicitly okay with helping with genocides, and where I feared that I would be punished if I either didn't help in some way or didn't appear supportive of helping, I would actually stick to this, since I don't think I've ever been in an environment with those sorts of pressures.
gollark: Maybe I should try arbitrarily increasing the confusion via recursion.
gollark: If people are randomly assigned (after initial mental development and such) to an environment where they're much more likely to do bad things, and one where they aren't, then it seems unreasonable to call people who are otherwise the same worse from being in the likely-to-do-bad-things environment.I suppose you could argue that how "good" you are is more about the change in probability between environments/the probability of a given real world environment being one which causes you to do bad things. But we can't check those with current technology.
gollark: I think you can think about it from a "veil of ignorance" angle too.
gollark: As far as I know, most moral standards are in favor of judging people by moral choices. Your environment is not entirely a choice.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.