1987 Refuge Assurance League
The 1987 Refuge Assurance League was the nineteenth competing of what was generally known as the Sunday League. The competition was won for the second time by Worcestershire County Cricket Club.
Administrator(s) | Test and County Cricket Board |
---|---|
Cricket format | Limited overs cricket(40 overs per innings) |
Tournament format(s) | League |
Champions | Worcestershire (2nd title) |
Participants | 17 |
Matches played | 136 |
Most runs | 617 Tim Curtis (Worcestershire) |
Most wickets | 25 Courtney Walsh (Gloucs)/Neal Radford (Worcs) |
The Worcestershire team included stars such as Ian Botham, Graeme Hick and Graham Dilley. Two other Worcs players got the batting and bowling plaudits. Opener Tim Curtis scored the most runs and fast bowler Neal Radford took the most wickets in the competition.
Standings
Team | Pld | W | T | L | N/R | A | Pts | R/R |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Worcestershire (C) | 16 | 11 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 46 | 5.369 |
Nottinghamshire | 16 | 9 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 44 | 4.933 |
Gloucestershire | 16 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 42 | 4.769 |
Somerset | 16 | 8 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 40 | 4.809 |
Derbyshire | 16 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 40 | 4.786 |
Kent | 16 | 8 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 38 | 5.131 |
Hampshire | 16 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 32 | 4.954 |
Surrey | 16 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 32 | 5.249 |
Lancashire | 16 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 30 | 5.170 |
Middlesex | 16 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 28 | 4.460 |
Northamptonshire | 16 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 28 | 5.026 |
Leicestershire | 16 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 26 | 4.902 |
Yorkshire | 16 | 5 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 26 | 5.209 |
Essex | 16 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 24 | 4.434 |
Glamorgan | 16 | 5 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 24 | 4.609 |
Sussex | 16 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 24 | 4.823 |
Warwickshire | 16 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 4.496 |
Team marked (C) finished as champions. Source: CricketArchive[1] |
Batting averages
Bowling averages
gollark: Don't those mostly depreciate *faster*?
gollark: … what? Lots of the letters don't look identical to the regular English/Latin ones.
gollark: Probably neither. I don't know why they have amazon.com and amazon.co.uk instead of redirecting one to the other (per-country branding with slightly less effort?) but due to web things™ they cannot share cookies.
gollark: Excellent. I know someone going on some sort of ant crusade and I have forwarded this to them.
gollark: National security reasons.
See also
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.