1976 John Player League
The 1976 John Player League was the eighth competing of what was generally known as the Sunday League. The competition was won for the third time by Kent County Cricket Club.
Administrator(s) | Test and County Cricket Board |
---|---|
Cricket format | Limited overs cricket(40 overs per innings) |
Tournament format(s) | League |
Champions | Kent (3rd title) |
Participants | 17 |
Matches played | 136 |
Most runs | 710 Barry Richards (Hampshire) |
Most wickets | 31 John Lever (Essex) |
Standings
Team | Pld | W | T | L | N/R | A | Pts | R/R |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kent (C) | 16 | 10 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 4.989 |
Essex | 16 | 10 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 4.56 |
Leicestershire | 16 | 10 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 4.703 |
Somerset | 16 | 10 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 4.847 |
Sussex | 16 | 10 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 4.564 |
Nottinghamshire | 16 | 9 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 4.91 |
Warwickshire | 16 | 9 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 4.909 |
Hampshire | 16 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 4.931 |
Lancashire | 16 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 4.076 |
Surrey | 16 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 5.002 |
Worcestershire | 16 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 4.872 |
Derbyshire | 16 | 7 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 4.614 |
Middlesex | 16 | 7 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 4.496 |
Northamptonshire | 16 | 7 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 4.399 |
Yorkshire | 16 | 6 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 4.769 |
Glamorgan | 16 | 5 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 4.414 |
Gloucestershire | 16 | 4 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 4.135 |
Team marked (C) finished as champions. Source: CricketArchive[1] |
Batting averages
Bowling averages
gollark: Is "interpreting things using different sets of techniques sometimes produces different/novel results" not enough for you?
gollark: What do you mean "rigorous take"?!
gollark: You mean Pascal's triangle?
gollark: Your idea of "run the thing backward" is quite obvious to anyone who looks at the problem. There have been many people looking at the problem. So if it worked someone would have proved collatz now.
gollark: <@!714406501346967572> 0.4 offense, but if you could easily prove the Collatz conjecture with relatively simple maths someone already would have,
See also
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.