1986–87 French Division 2
Statistics of Division 2 in the 1986–87 season.
Overview
It was contested by 36 teams, and Chamois Niort and Montpellier won the championship.
Group A
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Promotion or relegation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Niort | 34 | 24 | 7 | 3 | 48 | 15 | +33 | 55 | Promoted |
2 | Caen | 34 | 21 | 6 | 7 | 62 | 30 | +32 | 48 | |
3 | Mulhouse | 34 | 16 | 14 | 4 | 54 | 29 | +25 | 46 | |
4 | Reims | 34 | 18 | 7 | 9 | 53 | 34 | +19 | 43 | |
5 | Stade Quimpérois | 34 | 14 | 13 | 7 | 48 | 36 | +12 | 41 | |
6 | Beauvais | 34 | 15 | 8 | 11 | 47 | 39 | +8 | 38 | |
7 | Tours | 34 | 11 | 13 | 10 | 37 | 36 | +1 | 35 | |
8 | Dunkerque | 34 | 12 | 9 | 13 | 33 | 41 | −8 | 33 | |
9 | Strasbourg | 34 | 12 | 8 | 14 | 42 | 40 | +2 | 32 | |
10 | Guingamp | 34 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 48 | 47 | +1 | 32 | |
11 | Orléans | 34 | 11 | 10 | 13 | 33 | 35 | −2 | 32 | |
12 | Angers | 34 | 9 | 14 | 11 | 34 | 41 | −7 | 32 | |
13 | Valenciennes | 34 | 10 | 11 | 13 | 37 | 39 | −2 | 31 | |
14 | La Roche sur Yon | 34 | 9 | 11 | 14 | 34 | 40 | −6 | 29 | |
15 | Abbeville | 34 | 8 | 10 | 16 | 28 | 44 | −16 | 26 | |
16 | St Dizier | 34 | 6 | 12 | 16 | 34 | 52 | −18 | 24 | |
17 | Amiens | 34 | 5 | 13 | 16 | 25 | 56 | −31 | 23 | Relegated |
18 | Red Star | 34 | 4 | 4 | 26 | 25 | 68 | −43 | 12 |
Source: rsssf.com
Group B
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Promotion or relegation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Montpellier | 34 | 22 | 8 | 4 | 73 | 25 | +48 | 52 | Promoted |
2 | Lyon | 34 | 19 | 10 | 5 | 71 | 28 | +43 | 48 | |
3 | Cannes | 34 | 20 | 5 | 9 | 57 | 24 | +33 | 45 | Promoted |
4 | Alès | 34 | 16 | 11 | 7 | 47 | 24 | +23 | 43 | |
5 | Bastia | 34 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 62 | 49 | +13 | 41 | |
6 | Nîmes | 34 | 13 | 12 | 9 | 62 | 45 | +17 | 38 | |
7 | Limoges | 34 | 13 | 10 | 11 | 35 | 34 | +1 | 36 | Relegated |
8 | Sète | 34 | 13 | 9 | 12 | 40 | 41 | −1 | 35 | |
9 | Montceau | 34 | 12 | 10 | 12 | 41 | 38 | +3 | 34 | |
10 | Cuiseaux Louhans | 34 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 41 | 44 | −3 | 34 | |
11 | Gueugnon | 34 | 10 | 13 | 11 | 31 | 42 | −11 | 33 | |
12 | Le Puy | 34 | 10 | 10 | 14 | 36 | 40 | −4 | 30 | |
13 | Gazélec Ajaccio | 34 | 10 | 9 | 15 | 38 | 51 | −13 | 29 | |
14 | Istres | 34 | 9 | 11 | 14 | 33 | 47 | −14 | 29 | |
15 | Martigues | 34 | 9 | 9 | 16 | 29 | 41 | −12 | 27 | |
16 | Thonon | 34 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 27 | 45 | −18 | 24 | Relegated |
17 | Bourges | 34 | 7 | 8 | 19 | 32 | 60 | −28 | 22 | |
18 | Béziers | 34 | 2 | 8 | 24 | 18 | 95 | −77 | 12 |
Source: rsssf.com
gollark: Look, see, line.
gollark: I don't think that imposes enough constraints to get a unique solution.
gollark: - that is not actually an equation- it contains two unknown variables, so another equation would be needed
gollark: I got switched over to a class with my teacher from last year, who is very good, so it ended up fine.
gollark: Hmm, that is indeed very weird.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.