1985–86 French Division 2
Statistics of Division 2 in the 1985–86 season.
Overview
It was contested by 36 teams, and Saint-Étienne and Paris won the championship.
Group A
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Promotion or relegation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Saint-Étienne | 34 | 18 | 10 | 6 | 50 | 29 | +21 | 46 | Promoted |
2 | Olympique Alès | 34 | 16 | 9 | 9 | 33 | 22 | +11 | 41 | |
3 | Olympique Lyonnais | 34 | 14 | 12 | 8 | 47 | 31 | +16 | 40 | |
4 | Sète | 34 | 15 | 10 | 9 | 33 | 28 | +5 | 40 | |
5 | Montpellier | 34 | 15 | 9 | 10 | 61 | 49 | +12 | 39 | |
6 | Nîmes Olympique | 34 | 14 | 10 | 10 | 61 | 35 | +26 | 38 | |
7 | Le Puy | 34 | 14 | 7 | 13 | 52 | 41 | +11 | 35 | |
8 | Béziers | 34 | 13 | 9 | 12 | 43 | 38 | +5 | 35 | |
9 | Tours | 33 | 11 | 12 | 10 | 39 | 37 | +2 | 34 | |
10 | Gueugnon | 34 | 12 | 9 | 13 | 32 | 39 | −7 | 33 | |
11 | Martigues | 34 | 11 | 10 | 13 | 35 | 45 | −10 | 32 | |
12 | Cannes | 34 | 8 | 15 | 11 | 35 | 41 | −6 | 31 | |
13 | Thonon | 34 | 9 | 13 | 12 | 26 | 35 | −9 | 31 | |
14 | Montceau | 34 | 13 | 4 | 17 | 39 | 44 | −5 | 30 | |
15 | Istres | 34 | 8 | 14 | 12 | 39 | 47 | −8 | 30 | |
16 | Red Star Paris | 34 | 8 | 14 | 12 | 30 | 42 | −12 | 30 | |
17 | Chaumont | 34 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 35 | 58 | −23 | 26 | Relegated |
18 | Grenoble | 33 | 5 | 9 | 19 | 31 | 62 | −31 | 19 |
Source: rsssf.com
Group B
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Promotion or relegation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | RC Paris | 34 | 24 | 8 | 2 | 78 | 24 | +54 | 56 | Promoted |
2 | Mulhouse | 34 | 20 | 10 | 4 | 64 | 32 | +32 | 50 | |
3 | En Avant Guingamp | 34 | 17 | 13 | 4 | 68 | 35 | +33 | 47 | |
4 | Stade Reims | 34 | 17 | 9 | 8 | 49 | 37 | +12 | 43 | |
5 | Chamois Niort | 34 | 14 | 9 | 11 | 40 | 36 | +4 | 37 | |
6 | Caen | 34 | 14 | 9 | 11 | 33 | 31 | +2 | 37 | |
7 | Orléans | 34 | 12 | 9 | 13 | 39 | 42 | −3 | 33 | |
8 | Stade Quimpérois | 34 | 11 | 10 | 13 | 38 | 43 | −5 | 32 | |
9 | Abbeville | 34 | 12 | 6 | 16 | 41 | 60 | −19 | 30 | |
10 | Limoges | 34 | 11 | 7 | 16 | 40 | 43 | −3 | 29 | |
11 | Beauvais | 34 | 11 | 7 | 16 | 35 | 52 | −17 | 29 | |
12 | Valenciennes | 34 | 9 | 10 | 15 | 45 | 50 | −5 | 28 | |
13 | Dunkerque | 34 | 9 | 10 | 15 | 31 | 37 | −6 | 28 | |
14 | Besançon | 34 | 10 | 8 | 16 | 39 | 46 | −7 | 28 | |
15 | Angers | 34 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 32 | 47 | −15 | 28 | |
16 | Lorient | 34 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 28 | 53 | −25 | 28 | Relegated |
17 | Rouen | 34 | 11 | 5 | 18 | 32 | 43 | −11 | 27 | |
18 | CS Sedan Ardennes | 34 | 7 | 8 | 19 | 26 | 47 | −21 | 22 |
Source: rsssf.com
gollark: WRONG!
gollark: It will function at the speed of three (3) snails.
gollark: Having an option "websocket or TCP" and then a few `match`es to handle that would be MUCH EASIER than a plugin API.
gollark: Rust has TONS of decent scripting languages.
gollark: You could, in fact, just have some sort of "config file".
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.