1981 West Midlands County Council election
Local elections to the West Midlands County Council, a Metropolitan County Council encompassing the West Midlands, were held on 7 May 1981, resulting in large swings to Labour, giving them control of the council.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
104 seats to the West Midlands County Council 52 seats needed for a majority | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Turnout | 36.6% ( | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1981 metropolitan council election results in West midlands. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This was the last election to the West Midlands County Council, after metropolitan county councils were scrapped on 31 March 1986 under the Local Government Act 1985 by the Conservative government of Margaret Thatcher. The councils' abolition followed several high profile clashes between mostly Labour metropolitan county councils and the Conservative government over issues, including spending and rates charges.
Results
Party | Seats | Gains | Losses | Net gain/loss | Seats % | Votes % | Votes | +/− | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | 74 | 50.0 | |||||||
Conservative | 25 | 36.7 | |||||||
Liberal | 5 | 9.8 | |||||||
Independent | 0 | 0.5 | |||||||
Green | 0 | 0.4 | |||||||
Other parties | 0 | 2.5 |
Council Composition
After the election the composition of the council was:
74 | 25 | 5 |
Labour | Conservative | Liberal |
Borough summary
Borough | % |
Cllrs |
% |
Cllrs |
% |
Cllrs |
% |
Cllrs |
% |
Cllrs |
% |
Cllrs |
Total Cllrs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Conservative | Liberal | Green | Independent | Others | ||||||||
Birmingham | 49.7 | 30 | 35.0 | 9 | 12.4 | 3 | 0.8 | 0 | 0.1 | 0 | 2.0 | 0 | 42 |
Coventry | 49.3 | 9 | 37.1 | 3 | 12.3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1.4 | 0 | 12 |
Dudley | 57.2 | 9 | 40.2 | 2 | 1.7 | 0 | 0.7 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.2 | 0 | 11 |
Sandwell | 60.5 | 9 | 28.9 | 1 | 9.9 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.7 | 0 | 12 |
Solihull | 31.8 | 2 | 46.1 | 5 | 12.6 | 0 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 9.0 | 0 | 7 |
Walsall | 44.1 | 7 | 35.0 | 3 | 10.3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 3.8 | 0 | 6.8 | 0 | 10 |
Wolverhampton | 53.0 | 8 | 42.1 | 2 | 3.4 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.7 | 0 | 0.9 | 0 | 8 |
Total | 50.0 | 74 | 36.7 | 25 | 9.8 | 5 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.4 | 0 | 2.5 | 0 | 104 |
gollark: That list seems very arbitrary.
gollark: I guess you could do that. Although a language with that is probably strongly typed enough that you can't mix types in a list like in JS or whatever. Although you could do a similar thing with interfaces in TS and just have a `render` method if you need to display the thing in your list.
gollark: I meant more like `data Thing = AType Something SomethingElse | BType Int Whatever`.
gollark: Mysterious.
gollark: Which is basically just doing tagged unions without nice language support.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.