1980 Cumnock and Doon Valley District Council election
The 1980 Cumnock and Doon Valley District Council Election was held on 1 May 1980, the same day as the other Scottish local government elections, and constituted the second election for the Council.
The nationalist Scottish Labour Party, which had won two seats in the prior district election, lost all of its seats. One of the party's councillors in Patna/Dalrymple resigned the party whip, contesting (and winning) the election as an Independent. The other councillor, in Old Cumnock Parish, lost to the Labour candidate.
Election results
Party | Seats | Gains | Losses | Net gain/loss | Seats % | Votes % | Votes | +/− | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | 8 | 2 | 0 | ![]() |
80.0 | 48.2 | 3,828 | ![]() | |
Independent | 2 | 1 | 0 | ![]() |
20.0 | 24.8 | 1,791 | ![]() | |
SLP | 0 | 0 | 2 | ![]() |
0.0 | 16.3 | 1,290 | ![]() | |
Conservative | 0 | 0 | 1 | ![]() |
0.0 | 8.3 | 659 | ![]() | |
SNP | 0 | 0 | 0 | ![]() |
0.0 | 2.4 | 188 | ![]() |
Ward results
(*) represents a candidate seeking re-election for the same party as previously.
(~) represents a candidate seeking re-election in a different party.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | J. King* | 1,285 | 61.4 | |
SLP | Ms A. Welsh | 793 | 37.9 | |
Majority | 492 | |||
Turnout | 43.1 | |||
Labour hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Ms A. Lennox | 598 | 46.6 | ![]() | |
SLP | W. Pender* | 497 | 38.7 | ![]() | |
SNP | W. Milligan | 188 | 14.7 | ![]() | |
Majority | 101 | 7.9 | |||
Turnout | 1,283 | 54.4 | ![]() | ||
Labour gain from SLP | Swing | ||||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Independent | T. Hainey~ | 1,029 | 62.3 | ![]() | |
Labour | M. Rooney | 622 | 37.6 | ![]() | |
Majority | 407 | 24.7 | |||
Turnout | 1,651 | 53.5 | ![]() | ||
Independent gain from SLP | Swing | ||||
gollark: I will defend my headcanon with headcannons if necessary.
gollark: Also, this is the *canonical* cyber PC now.
gollark: Anyway, if you think about it, then since my search index is something like 4GB, and the internet is several... exabytes, probably..., and search engines can search that in half a second, then recoll *should* be able to work in an attosecond or so.
gollark: Matrix is apiously complicated, denied.
gollark: I suspect that part of it might be that my disk is a slow outdated 7200RPM hard disk, since it's *quite* fast after I refresh, but still.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.