1978 FIFA World Cup Group 4
Group 4 of the 1978 FIFA World Cup began on 3 June and ended on 11 June 1978. The group consisted of Iran, Netherlands, Peru, and Scotland.
Standings
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Qualification |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() |
3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 2 | +5 | 5 | Advance to second round |
2 | ![]() |
3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | +2 | 3 | |
3 | ![]() |
3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 6 | −1 | 3 | |
4 | ![]() |
3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | −6 | 1 |
Source: FIFA
Matches
Peru vs Scotland
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Peru
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Scotland
|
|
|
Assistant referees:
|
Netherlands vs Iran
Netherlands ![]() | 3–0 | ![]() |
---|---|---|
Rensenbrink ![]() |
Report |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Netherlands
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Iran
|
|
|
Assistant referees:
|
Scotland vs Iran
Scotland ![]() | 1–1 | ![]() |
---|---|---|
Eskandarian ![]() |
Report | Danaeifard ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Scotland
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Iran
|
|
|
Assistant referees:
|
Netherlands vs Peru
Netherlands ![]() | 0–0 | ![]() |
---|---|---|
Report |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Netherlands
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Peru
|
|
|
Assistant referees:
|
Peru vs Iran
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Peru
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Iran
|
|
|
Assistant referees:
|
Scotland vs Netherlands
Scotland ![]() | 3–2 | ![]() |
---|---|---|
Dalglish ![]() A. Gemmill ![]() |
Report | Rensenbrink ![]() Rep ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Scotland
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Netherlands
|
|
|
Assistant referees:
|
gollark: Writing a bare metal microkernel in Haskell is not very practical.
gollark: > I never tried it. It's nice that it has these safety features but I prefer C++ still. > If I want to be sure that my program is free of bugs, I can write a formal specification and do a > correctness proof with the hoare calculus in some theorem proofer (People did that for the seL4 microkernel, which is free from bugs under some assumptions and used in satellites, nuclear power plants and such)Didn't doing that for seL4 require several hundred thousand lines of proof code?
gollark: Most countries have insanely convoluted tax law so I assume it's possible.
gollark: Hmm, so you need to obtain a hypercomputer of some sort to write your tax forms such that they cannot plausibly be checked?
gollark: What if it's somehow really easy to find *a* solution to something, but not specific ones, and hard to check the validity of a specific maybe-solution? Is that possible?
References
- Arkivperu.com
- FIFA.com
- El Comercio
- The Sons of Scotland
- Netherlands-Peru, game report
- Netherlands-Peru, game report
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.