1974–75 Sussex County Football League

The 1974–75 Sussex County Football League season was the 50th in the history of Sussex County Football League a football competition in England.[1][2]

Division One

Sussex County Football League
Division One
Season1974–75
ChampionsSouthwick
RelegatedSidley United
Portfield
Matches played210
Goals scored554 (2.64 per match)

Division One featured 13 clubs which competed in the division last season, along with two new clubs, promoted from Division Two:

League table

Pos Team Pld W D L GF GA GR Pts Qualification or relegation
1 Southwick 28 18 5 5 58 24 2.417 41
2 Haywards Heath 28 16 7 5 48 20 2.400 39
3 Wigmore Athletic 28 13 10 5 38 24 1.583 36
4 Ringmer 28 13 4 11 45 38 1.184 30
5 Littlehampton Town 28 12 5 11 36 33 1.091 29
6 East Grinstead 28 10 7 11 30 30 1.000 27
7 Horsham YMCA 28 11 5 12 38 44 0.864 27
8 Arundel 28 10 7 11 31 37 0.838 27
9 Newhaven 28 10 5 13 36 40 0.900 25
10 Whitehawk 28 11 3 14 37 44 0.841 25
11 Bexhill Town 28 10 5 13 30 38 0.789 25
12 Chichester City 28 9 7 12 27 41 0.659 25
13 Three Bridges 28 7 9 12 32 36 0.889 23
14 Sidley United 28 9 6 13 32 41 0.780 22[lower-alpha 1] Relegated to Division Two
15 Portfield 28 6 5 17 36 64 0.563 17
Source: nonleaguematters
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal ratio.
Notes:
  1. Sidley United were deducted two points.

Division Two

Sussex County Football League
Division Two
Season1974–75
ChampionsBurgess Hill Town
PromotedBurgess Hill Town
Rye United
Matches played132
Goals scored394 (2.98 per match)

Division Two featured nine clubs which competed in the division last season, along with three new clubs:

League table

Pos Team Pld W D L GF GA GR Pts Qualification or relegation
1 Burgess Hill Town 22 16 5 1 49 14 3.500 37 Promoted to Division One
2 Rye United 22 15 5 2 48 16 3.000 35
3 Shoreham 22 11 4 7 34 25 1.360 26
4 Crowborough Athletic 22 9 7 6 38 36 1.056 25
5 Hastings & St Leonards 22 8 6 8 33 34 0.971 22
6 Peacehaven & Telscombe 22 9 3 10 40 38 1.053 21
7 Steyning 22 5 10 7 28 32 0.875 20
8 Lancing 22 5 7 10 25 34 0.735 17
9 Seaford Town 22 5 7 10 25 34 0.735 16[lower-alpha 1]
10 Selsey 22 7 2 13 29 45 0.644 16
11 Pagham 22 6 3 13 25 46 0.543 15
12 Wick 22 4 5 13 20 40 0.500 13
Source: nonleaguematters
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal ratio.
Notes:
  1. Seaford Town were deducted one point.
gollark: I'll ask them to thing it.
gollark: It's hosted on heav's computer, which experienced ??? some time ago.
gollark: GEORGE™GEORGE™GEORGE™GEORGE™GEORGE™GEORGE™GEORGE™GEORGE™GEORGE™GEORGE™GEORGE™
gollark: It is IN NO WAY subliminal pizza advertising because I DO NOT work for pizza companies in any form. __*This is NOT true*__. I have not in any way been sponsored by pizza companies. There have been no advertising agreements whatsoever with any companies producing pizza or otherwise to have me subliminally advertise pizza, as my profile picture is not a pizza. *Since it is not a pizza*, this is obviously not pizza advertisement whatsoever. No monetary exchanges or otherwise have occurred with companies engaged in pizza production for any reason relating to my profile picture. *It's not pizza.* There were no deals, under-the-table or otherwise, with pizza companies. No pizza companies pay for any kind of subliminal advertising involving me. **I'm DEFINITELY not** paid by pizza companies to have ANY subliminal pizza advertising, actually. It is not a pizza. People say that it's subliminal advertising for the delicious pepperoni pizza offered by PizzaCo, but really it's not. __It has never been a pizza__. My profile picture is not, will not, has not been and cannot be, in any way whatsoever, a pizza.
gollark: Factually incorrect.

References

  1. "Sussex County Football League 1960–1980". Non League Matters.
  2. "SCFL Historic League Tables". Southern Combination Football League. Archived from the original on 2019-01-19. Retrieved 2019-01-25.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.