1965 Argentine Primera División
The 1965 Argentine Primera División was the 74th season of top-flight football in Argentina. The season began on April 18 and ended on December 19.[1]
Season | 1965 |
---|---|
Champions | Boca Juniors (16th title) |
Promoted | Lanús Platense |
Relegated | (none) |
1966 Copa Libertadores | Boca Juniors River Plate |
Top goalscorer | |
← 1964 1966 → |
There were 18 teams in the tournament, who competed in a single double round-robin tournament. Boca Juniors won its 16th league title with no teams relegated.
Standings
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Boca Juniors | 34 | 19 | 12 | 3 | 55 | 30 | +25 | 50 |
2 | River Plate | 34 | 22 | 5 | 7 | 55 | 24 | +31 | 49 |
3 | Vélez Sarsfield | 34 | 14 | 12 | 8 | 48 | 32 | +16 | 40 |
4 | Ferro Carril Oeste | 34 | 11 | 15 | 8 | 41 | 33 | +8 | 37 |
5 | Racing | 34 | 10 | 16 | 8 | 39 | 35 | +4 | 36 |
6 | Estudiantes (LP) | 34 | 13 | 10 | 11 | 41 | 39 | +2 | 36 |
7 | Platense | 34 | 12 | 11 | 11 | 37 | 30 | +7 | 35 |
8 | San Lorenzo | 34 | 12 | 10 | 12 | 41 | 35 | +6 | 34 |
9 | Banfield | 34 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 34 | 32 | +2 | 34 |
10 | Rosario Central | 34 | 9 | 14 | 11 | 37 | 39 | −2 | 32 |
11 | Newell's Old Boys | 34 | 9 | 14 | 11 | 29 | 40 | −11 | 32 |
12 | Independiente[lower-alpha 1] | 34 | 8 | 15 | 11 | 30 | 31 | −1 | 31 |
13 | Huracán | 34 | 11 | 9 | 14 | 45 | 54 | −9 | 31 |
14 | Atlanta | 34 | 9 | 11 | 14 | 33 | 42 | −9 | 29 |
15 | Lanús | 34 | 9 | 11 | 14 | 31 | 43 | −12 | 29 |
16 | Argentinos Juniors | 34 | 10 | 8 | 16 | 41 | 51 | −10 | 28 |
17 | Gimnasia y Esgrima (LP) | 34 | 9 | 7 | 18 | 31 | 57 | −26 | 25 |
18 | Chacarita Juniors | 34 | 5 | 14 | 15 | 32 | 53 | −21 | 24 |
Source:
Notes:
Notes:
- Independiente won the 1965 Copa Libertadores, so, they qualified for the semifinals of the 1966 Copa Libertadores as title holders.
gollark: CNAME/A/AAAA records in their DNS panel.
gollark: Right now I don't think it offers significant *feature* improvements over mediawiki, but I have some neat ideas MW cannot practically do.
gollark: Don't use that. It makes them host HTTP for your domain and send 301 redirects to somewhere else.
gollark: - good contextual backlinks- small code base, can actually be read, also lightweight- simple Markdown support instead of horrible, *horrible* custom wikitext implementation- cooler login page- single user design
gollark: It's good because it has cool features, not too much code, and a fairly nice UI.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.