105th Infantry Division Rovigo
The 105th Infantry Division Rovigo was an auto-transportable Infantry Division of the Italian Army during World War II.[nb 1] The Rovigo was classified as an auto-transportable division, meaning staff and equipment could be transported on cars and trucks, although not simultaneously. The Division was mobilized in March 1942, and took part in the Italian invasion of Vichy France, as part of the Italian I Corps. It then returned to Italy and surrendered to the German forces in September 1943, after the Italian armistice.[1]
105th Infantry Division Rovigo | |
---|---|
105th Infantry Division Rovigo Insignia | |
Active | 1942–1943 |
Country | Kingdom of Italy |
Branch | Royal Italian Army |
Type | Infantry |
Size | Division |
Nickname(s) | Rovigo |
Engagements | World War II |
Insignia | |
Identification symbol | |
Identification symbol | Rovigio Division collar insignia |
Italian I Corps for the Invasion of Vichy France
- 104th Infantry Division Mantova
- 105th Infantry Division Rovigo
- 5th Alpine Division Pusteria
Order of battle
Notes
- Footnotes
- The division never has the required amount of Motor Transport to move all its units at the same time and is referred to as an Auto-transportable Division
- An Italian Infantry Division normally consisted of two Infantry Regiments (three Battalions each), an Artillery Regiment, a Mortar Battalion (two companies), an Anti Tank Company, a Blackshirt Legion of two Battalions was sometimes attached. Each Division had only about 7,000 men, The Infantry and Artillery Regiments contained 1,650 men, the Blackshirt Legion 1,200, each company 150 men.[2]
- Citations
- Wendal, Marcus. "Italian Army". Axis History. Archived from the original on 2009-04-27. Retrieved 2009-04-16.
- Paoletti, p 170
- Paoletti, Ciro (2008). A Military History of Italy. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 0-275-98505-9.
gollark: Like how I fear C, and all heavy machinery ever.
gollark: It seems reasonable to fear powerful and highly footgun-y tools.
gollark: You're just assuming something is symmetric because you... have examples of values on both sides?
gollark: Don't do that, it's actually bad.
gollark: (I do not know enough population genetics to say and I'd be handwavily guessing half the parameters anyway)
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.