What does the "Fi" in "Wi-Fi" mean?

316

46

I just got into a heated discussion about Wi-Fi. What does the Fi in Wi-Fi mean? I would have thought potentially "frequency interface" since all network adapters are classified as interfaces. However I'm not certain.

NotAdmin Dave

Posted 2016-06-06T23:35:26.260

Reputation: 2 771

Answers

377

Preface:

There has been much discussion in comments and other answers about how to interpret the term "Wi-Fi"; what it should or does mean by virtue of historical and common usage and implied meaning. There is no "right answer" to that. This answer can only address what the term is officially supposed to mean, and the historical background that has given rise to these arguments.

Wi-Fi did not originate as an abbreviation

The Wi-Fi name and logo were designed as simply a trademark. To quote the article Wi-Fi Definition is Not Wireless Fidelity on Webopedia,

Wi-Fi isn't short for anything

It was, however, a play on words with "hi-fi".

Background

The term Wi-Fi, commercially used at least as early as August 1999, was coined by brand-consulting firm Interbrand Corporation. The Wi-Fi Alliance had hired Interbrand to determine a name that was "a little catchier than 'IEEE 802.11b Direct Sequence'". Phil Belanger, a founding member of the Wi-Fi Alliance who presided over the selection of the name "Wi-Fi", also stated that Interbrand invented Wi-Fi as a play on words with hi-fi, and also created the Wi-Fi logo.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wi-Fi

If you look at the brand names Interbrand has created, most are meaningless sounds that are catchy to say, or nonsensical combinations of word pieces to create a new "word". The objective of a brand name is to conjure an association in the user's mind; the definition is the product. Interbrand's proposal of "Wi-Fi" was likely because it had a letter pattern reminiscent of "hi-fi" and rhymed with it, making it a good marketing "word".

As I'll describe shortly, the Alliance was trying to promote the use of wireless LANs to the home market to transfer audio and video. The similarity to "hi-fi" was a good fit, but not because "hi-fi" meant "high fidelity".

Most people know that "hi-fi" had been shortened from "high fidelity". However, "Wi-Fi" was coined half a century later, and "hi-fi had evolved. It was no longer short for, or synonymous with, "high fidelity". Its last common usage was as slang for ubiquitous, consumer-grade audio equipment or reproduction.

So the "link" between "Wi-Fi" and "hi-fi", at that point, was simply the association with music and multi-media, not the meaning of the syllables. Just because "hi-fi" was shortened from "high fidelity" doesn't reserve the "fi" in every word that imitates that letter pattern to meaning "fidelity".

Origin of "Wireless Fidelity"

After adopting the name and logo, some of the Alliance members had a problem with the concept that something that looked like an abbreviation didn't have a literal explanation. As a compromise, it was agreed to include, along with the name, the tag line, "The Standard for Wireless Fidelity". This implied a word association without there actually being one. As Phil Belanger describes it:

Wi-Fi doesn't stand for anything. It is not an acronym. There is no meaning.

This tag line was invented after the fact. ... The tag line was invented by the initial six member board and it does not mean anything either. ... And "Wireless Fidelity" - what does that mean? Nothing. It was a clumsy attempt to come up with two words that matched Wi and Fi. That's it.

Excerpted from WiFi isn't short for "Wireless Fidelity"

Further explanation from Belanger:

The current confusion seems to stem from a brief period early in the days of the Wi-Fi Alliance when a regrettable tag line was added that stated, "The Standard for Wireless Fidelity." This was not part of the original name and was not created by Interbrand, but it was added as an afterthought in an attempt to help users make sense of the new and somewhat nonsensical word, "Wi-Fi."

We weren't creating standards -- we were promoting an existing standard. One of the motivations was that we were trying to expand the use of WLANs to the home market, so this notion of "wireless fidelity", some people felt like if they're going to transfer audio and video around their house, then maybe that has some of the appeal. We have this name Wi-Fi. What two words have "wi" and "fi" starting them? Maybe it can help support our goal?"

By the end of 2000, the pointless tagline was dropped and the term "wireless fidelity" was supposed to disappear into the ether. But somehow, as the Wi-Fi brand gained traction, so did the mistaken notion that it was "short for wireless fidelity."

Excerpted from 'Wireless Fidelity' Debunked

Conclusion

Officially, "Wi-Fi" has no meaning. The Wi-Fi Alliance created the impression that it stands for "wireless fidelity" and has spent the last 16 years trying to correct that. However, the word association is still well-entrenched and still repeated.

Addendum

The next generation replacement for Wi-Fi may be a technology currently in development, based on data transmission embedded in LED room lighting. As described in another SU post, the developer is among the people who believe "Wi-Fi" stands for "wireless fidelity". As a cute knock-off of a cute knock-off, he coined the name "Li-Fi", and explicitly called it "light fidelity".

So regardless of the Wi-Fi Alliance's original intent, "fidelity" may be here to stay. The decision to use the tag line created the "gift that keeps on giving".

fixer1234

Posted 2016-06-06T23:35:26.260

Reputation: 24 254

9There are 75 different reference links on that page alone. Looks like a great source to me. – Zack T. – 2016-06-07T21:40:47.187

37Not to dig too deep into linguistics here, but if it's "commonly thought" to stand for something, and that something more or less makes sense, and there's nothing else it really could stand for, and the advertising campaign from the original people that came up with the word strongly implied that it does stand for that thing, then how seriously can the claim that "it doesn't stand for anything" be taken? It's a bit like Steve Wilhite thinking that because he invented the word "gif" he has absolute authority over its pronunciation. – Kyle Strand – 2016-06-07T22:36:50.337

As a thought experiment, if, in 100 years, when all the original inventors of Wi-Fi and the people involved with its branding are dead, if the Wi-Fi standard is still in use, could someone step forward and say "okay, now it officially stands for <something>"? – Kyle Strand – 2016-06-07T22:37:59.827

18It's not as clear cut at that: Phil Belanger, a founding member of the Wi-Fi Alliance who presided over the selection of the name "Wi-Fi", also stated that Interbrand invented Wi-Fi as a play on words with hi-fi. Since the name "Wi-fi" had its origins in the name "Hi-fi" (i.e High Fidelity), it could be argued that the "Fi", does indeed mean "Fidelity" – Johnny – 2016-06-07T22:38:51.487

3

But Li-Fi is apparently short for "Light Fidelity"

– Nick T – 2016-06-08T05:08:17.990

3

@NickT: We're way ahead of you (by a day) :-) http://superuser.com/questions/1086276/what-does-the-fi-in-li-fi-mean. Short answer, the Li-Fi originator based his marketing name on the misconception described here.

– fixer1234 – 2016-06-08T05:13:50.490

@KyleStrand "commonly thought" doesn't carry much weight in etymology. There are countless folk etymologies that are commonly thought to be true, but that doesn't make them correct. The rest of your comment is right on the money, however. – phoog – 2016-06-08T13:13:53.583

@phoog I agree, but etymologies are historical; I just said that Wi-Fi is "commonly thought" to stand for "wireless fidelity" today, regardless of how the term arose. I guess you could say that my whole point is that the term can be "short for" something in the present day separately from its etymology, i.e. whether it was actually conceived that way. – Kyle Strand – 2016-06-08T14:33:24.797

2I always thought it was clear that "Fidelity" was a meaningless term in this context, but does this imply that "Wi" doesn't even stand for "Wireless"? – DasBeasto – 2016-06-08T17:09:21.170

3Wi-Fi was intended as a play on Hi-Fi.. that would make the etyomoloy of the -Fi part Fidelity – Matthew Whited – 2016-06-08T18:08:14.183

8-1. The answer is biased in misleading. If you're going to say that the fi in wi-fi does not stand for fidelity, and that wi-fi is a play on hi-fi, you have to at least mention that the fi in hi-fi does stand for fidelity. – Meni Rosenfeld – 2016-06-08T19:57:38.817

2"Interbrand Corporation" ...This sounds like some evil company out of comic books... @MeniRosenfeld Looks like your request has been implemented. – jpmc26 – 2016-06-08T23:17:04.720

3So if

"Wi-Fi Alliance had hired Interbrand to determine a name"

what was the name of the Alliance before they hired Interbrand to come up with the name Wi-Fi ?? If it was Wi-Fi Alliance, then Interbrand didn't have to hold too many meetings and do much research to come up with Wi-Fi – Mark Stewart – 2016-06-09T13:54:50.720

"The next generation replacement for Wi-Fi" - ... not that it will be commonly called anything other than "wi-fi" ;) (From the point of view of most users, "wifi" denotes almost anything that supplies a network connection without a cable.) – O. R. Mapper – 2016-06-09T18:54:43.100

5@Johnny @MatthewWhited Wi-Fi has no origins. It was created new in the style of Hi-Fi because it's catchy and familiar. Any sort of logical conclusion about the meaning of Wi-Fi based on the meaning of Hi-Fi is incorrect because their meanings are in no way related. – Substantial – 2016-06-11T16:02:08.353

3Why would the Fi mean fidelity, today or at any other point in time? Wireless Fidelity doesn't actually mean anything - which means that it's pointless as much as it is confusing. – Vegard – 2016-06-13T06:56:56.253

Ha, this is great. I think we should all start using the French pronunciation as someone clearly whiffed when coming up with this name.

– CactusCake – 2016-06-13T14:11:34.080

I remember seeing an episode of the Computer Chronicles in early 2000s where they referred to Wi-Fi as "standing for Wireless Fidelity". Right or wrong, that's the impression that people have. So, what's wrong with saying that it stands for the phrase? It would be like "Microsoft" claiming that "soft" does not stand for software. Come on. – Brandin – 2016-06-13T15:57:36.887

@Vegard "Wireless Fidelity" doesn't mean anything in and of itself. It is simply a reference to "High Fidelity". The term "high fidelity" doesn't have a well-defined meaning either. – Brandin – 2016-06-13T15:59:37.920

"[hi-fi']s last common usage was as slang for ubiquitous, consumer-grade audio equipment or reproduction." I have great difficulty accepting this as true. That is, to me, the exact definition of what the term "hi-fi" differentiates itself from. – Darren Ringer – 2016-06-13T20:37:32.163

@DarrenRinger: "High Fidelity" originated in the 1930's, even predating stereo. What came before was definitely "low fidelity". It originally differentiated sound in movie theaters that was better than noise, and the great sound of AM radio broadcasts. Around 1950, young baby boomers had access to consumer grade sound reproduction that was way better than what came out of things like Gramophones. The "hi-fi" was the family record player. When "high fidelity" was used in subsequent decades, it was used to differentiate higher-end reproduction from hi-fi. – fixer1234 – 2016-06-13T21:55:27.097

@fixer1234 that certainly makes sense, but I don't see why "hi-fi" couldn't be a moving target. I never heard anyone use it to refer to low-end equipment. Perhaps I am not applying the term "consumer-grade" as broadly. But "hi-fi" always at least refers to the upper-end of what you can buy in a department store, in the usage I've always heard. Perhaps a few decades ago when record players were in vogue the term was thrown about much more carelessly. – Darren Ringer – 2016-06-14T13:04:52.863

44

In the good old days, many people would have a home 'Hi-Fi' setup. The Wi-Fi alliance wanted a name catchier than 'IEEE 802.11b Direct Sequence', and so hired the Interbrand company to create a name. They chose 'Wi-Fi' simply as a pun on 'Hi-Fi', however an advertisement published afterwards declared 'The standard for Wireless Fidelity', leading to the misconception that Wi-Fi was short for 'Wireless Fidelity', especially as 'Hi-Fi' meant 'High Fidelity'

George Gibson

Posted 2016-06-06T23:35:26.260

Reputation: 541

20I don't know about you, but "Eye Triple E Eight O Two Point Eleven B Direct Sequence" sounds awesome to me. – Derek 朕會功夫 – 2016-06-11T05:44:19.783

3@Derek sounds like the name for a photon torpedo firing solution on the Enterprise :P – hiergiltdiestfu – 2016-06-13T13:21:10.073

1The Wi-Fi alliance ... hired the Interbrand company to create a name. Sounds like the alliance already had their name when they hired Interbrand. – Dan Henderson – 2016-06-13T19:33:12.763

@DanHenderson but they needed someone to come up with how their name would be called. – None – 2016-06-13T19:39:49.723

26

Evidence

A quote from Frank Hanzlik, MD of Wi-Fi Alliance, discussing the creation of the term in 1999: "'Wireless Fidelity' Debunked"

In the very early days of building the brand, there was a linkage to the Hi-Fi chronology

Thus the origin of the term Wi-Fi is Hi-Fi, and the Fi in that stands for Fidelity.

Phil Bellinger, co-founder of WECA, acknowledges the phrase "Wireless Fidelity" was in official use until at least 2000: "Wi-Fi isn't short for Wireless Fidelity"

So we compromised and agreed to include the tag line "The Standard for Wireless Fidelity" along with the name.

An official publication from the Wi-Fi Alliance, dated 2003, shows the term still in use: "Securing Wi-Fi Wireless Networks with Today’s Technologies"

The association created the Wi-Fi (Wireless Fidelity) logo

It seems clear that whatever individuals may claim now, or their opinions on the phrase, it did stand for Wireless Fidelity, based on a reference to Hi-Fi (High Fidelity) audio systems.

Of course, that doesn't change the fact that "Wireless Fidelity" is largely meaningless, nor does it matter that it's a pun-based back-formation from a cool-sounding, equally meaningless brand name.

Conclusion

So what does Wi-Fi mean? It has layers of meaning, so take your pick:

  • It's the family of IEEE 802.11 standards used for WLAN
  • It's "Wireless Fidelity", a meaningless phrase in this context
  • It's a reference to "Hi-Fi", which means "High Fidelity"
  • It's a catchy brand name that gets everyone talking
  • It's Phil Belanger's greatest regret

OrangeDog

Posted 2016-06-06T23:35:26.260

Reputation: 679

I qualify the "truthful" part because marketing associations like to engage in wishful thinking. Anyone remember SCSI connectors? (Small Computer Systems Interface. Apparently they're still around, though not talked about much.) Everyone called it "scuzzy", but this vendor's documentation optimistically proclaimed that it's "pronounced Sky-z". Yeah, right. – alexis – 2016-06-07T21:28:23.117

22003 seems awfully late for this to be authoritative; as noted elsewhere, the term was in use for at least four years before this publication. It seems more likely that this is an inadvertent use by some copywriter with no particular special knowledge or authority, and no one caught it. – mattdm – 2016-06-07T22:32:43.083

And in fact, as this article linked in another answer notes, the Wi-Fi Alliance did use "Wireless Fidelity" in later marketing materials for a short time — but that was after it originally stood for nothing.

– mattdm – 2016-06-07T22:35:07.973

1Everyone really wants to make excuses for Wi-Fi Alliance accidentally officially calling it Wireless Fidelity for years, rather than believe they did it on purpose. – OrangeDog – 2016-06-07T22:36:09.567

@OrangeDog There's a huge difference between "that's the original, 'real' meaning" and "someone later decided that it sounded good and used it for a while". – mattdm – 2016-06-08T02:27:22.070

Yes, originally it's based on Hi-Fi so it stands for Fidelity, then later they explicitly said it means Wireless Fidelity. Then individual people said it means nothing, but the Wi-Fi Alliance never did. – OrangeDog – 2016-06-08T06:04:28.750

I don't see what's so bad about "wireless exactness", which is the desired function of Wi-Fi, much like not having packet loss in wired connections. – Cees Timmerman – 2016-06-08T12:03:33.670

@CeesTimmerman true but Fidelity in this context generally refers to reproduction of analogue data, which doesn't apply to OSI level 1 as much as it does to audio playback equipment. – OrangeDog – 2016-06-08T12:13:57.873

"Hi-fi" was never a brand name. (Neither is deriving "Wi-Fi" from "hi-fi" a back formation, for that matter.) – phoog – 2016-06-08T13:18:28.913

@phoog I never claimed it was (though see history here), and I don't think that's relevant to the answer. The back-formation I am referencing is "Wi-Fi -> Wireless Fidelity".

– OrangeDog – 2016-06-08T13:19:16.307

@mattdm on the contrary, the lateness of 2003 proves it wasn't just a briefly-used throw-away tagline. – OrangeDog – 2016-06-14T11:09:04.030

@OrangeDog That only makes sense if you can also find an earlier reference. – mattdm – 2016-06-14T11:12:08.693

@mattdm fixer1234 has already done that work – OrangeDog – 2016-06-14T11:14:32.353

Errrrrr.... right, the work of showing that the "expansion" was invented and added later, rather than what it originally stood for, as you seem to claim. – mattdm – 2016-06-14T11:36:15.937

@mattdm that's just your interpretation of the sources based on your interpretation of "meaning", and I maintain that the "original" meaning (even though clearly the origin of Fi is Fidelity as in Hi-Fi) doesn't matter. – OrangeDog – 2016-06-14T11:39:58.033

It seems like the only interpretation, unless there are some other sources to the contrary which no one has yet shown. – mattdm – 2016-06-14T16:32:45.457

@mattdm other than my 2003 source – OrangeDog – 2016-06-14T16:41:34.627

2Maybe we need to come up with a new term, other than: 'meaning', 'etymology', 'derivation', 'back-formation', etc. which means: "what people associate this term with." I know, we could call it "meaning". Bear in mind, that is just what the term is called. We don't have to actually have a name for it. It could be a Lambda Term. "You know I've been through the desert on a Horst with no Name..." Also, it doesn't have to actually exist. It could be virtual. – None – 2016-06-14T18:16:24.837

20

Wi-Fi doesn't stand for anything. It is not an acronym. There is no meaning. Most people believe Wi-Fi stands for Wireless Fidelity which is a popular misconception.

Phil Belanger, a founding member of the Wi-Fi Alliance who presided over the selection of the name "Wi-Fi", also stated that Interbrand invented Wi-Fi as a play on words with hi-fi, and also created the Wi-Fi logo. The Wi-Fi Alliance used the "nonsense" advertising slogan "The Standard for Wireless Fidelity" for a short time after the brand name was invented, leading to the misconception that Wi-Fi was an abbreviation of "Wireless Fidelity"?

This misconception of the faux abbreviation of Wi-Fi led to a further faux etymology of the term Li-Fi which, now the creator of Li-Fi has officially announced Li-Fi to be abbreviated as Light-Fidelity.

Krish Munot

Posted 2016-06-06T23:35:26.260

Reputation: 442

"The Simulacrum is True" – None – 2016-06-14T18:21:22.007

5

With sound system's, Hi-Fi label came to differentiate products over Lo-Fi ones.

Fast forward to Wireless age, some marketing gurus had a long meeting and decided Wi-Fi was a continuation of an acronym that is well known world wide, making people adopt it much easily.

Korayem

Posted 2016-06-06T23:35:26.260

Reputation: 226