Puritans

Puritans was a term used from the late 16th to the late 17th century for various sects and creeds of zealous English Protestants who adhered very enthusiastically to "Reformed" or Calvinist theology. Puritans are best known for their influence during the English Civil War era (1640s) and republican proto-dictatorship of Oliver Cromwell (1650s)[2] and for emigrating in large numbers to New England (most famously on the Mayflower voyage of 1620-21 and the founding the Plymouth Colony), there to play a crucial role in the foundation of what later became the United States and its national culture.

Christ died for
our articles about

Christianity
Schismatics
Devil's in the details
The pearly gates
  • Christianity portal
v - t - e
This page contains too many unsourced statements and needs to be improved.

Puritans could use some help. Please research the article's assertions. Whatever is credible should be sourced, and what is not should be removed.

What may be forgotten today, however, is the Puritan rejection of democracy in favor of rule by biblical law. "The Puritans," according to Thomas Ice, fused "church and state into a theocratic government."
—(Dominion Theology, Blessing or Curse, H. Wayne House and Thomas Ice, 1988, p. 95) [1]

Notable Puritans include Cromwell, the poet John Milton, who wrote Paradise Lost, and the author John Bunyan who wrote Pilgrim's Progress.

Among the most infamous incidents associated with the Puritans was a moral panic over witchcraft in 1692-1693, leading to the Salem Witch Trials.[3]

Beliefs

Puritans believed that the Roman Catholic Church had polluted True ChristianityTM, and that the Protestant Reformation in Europe had not gone far enough in rejecting the vestiges of Catholicism.[4] Some Puritans wished to 'purify' national churches (such as the Church of England) from within, while others (separatists or nonconformists), such as the Pilgrims, sought to practice their religion in separate congregations.[5]

Puritan beliefs were largely derived from Calvinism, but there was no single set of beliefs and practices. Puritan groups generally professed the following:

  • Belief in the Bible as the only true path to Christianity, and rejection of non-Biblical theologies (purgatory, absolution, transubstantiation, etc.)
  • Belief in a direct and personal relationship with God ("the priesthood of all believers") through prayer, personal conscience and confession to God (not to a priest).
  • Rejection of the mysticism surrounding ordained priests, as well as their rituals; Puritans eschewed the use of the word "priest" and dispensed with the upper levels of the former ecclesiastical hierarchy, practicing congregational church governance.[5]
  • Rejection of religious imagery and other artworks as "idolatrous". This sometimes extended to iconoclasm - breaking statues, pictures and church windows.
  • Viewing contemporary society as decadent and sinful, and extreme disapproval of "worldly" activities such as dancing, drunkenness, gambling, and the theater.[5]

Political and sociological usage

The term "puritan" became popular during the sexual revolution as a general pejorative synonymous with "prude", along with the explanation that lingering Puritanism in American culture was largely to blame for lack of openness about sexual matters and nudity, in contrast to the openness in countries like France and Sweden. This usage was common in the 1960s-1980s but not so much today. Puritanism is often viewed as one of the roots of the modern religious right.

Puritanism has conversely also been viewed as a source of modern political progressivism, inasmuch as the original Puritans who settled in New England were utopian and desired to stamp out various social evils. The Puritan influence in the northeast along with the Quaker influence in the mid-Atlantic region led the northern U.S. to become strongly anti-slavery[6], in contrast to the pro-slavery English Cavalier culture which took hold in the coastal Southeast which is seen as the root of modern conservatism, and the Scots-Irish who settled in Appalachia who had quasi-libertarian attitudes and weren't inclined to side with either side in the slavery debate. Albion's Seed (1989) by David Hackett Fischer is a popular book on the subject attempting to trace modern political divisions in the U.S. to these four migrations from England.[7]

According to this view, as the strict Puritan religion waned, the utopian leanings remained and the desire to stamp out social ills shifted from things like dancing and theater to slavery, alcohol, and poverty: indeed, the early prohibitionist and socialist movements often involved the same people, who also took up causes ranging from the necessary and long overdue (women's suffrage) to the misguided (eugenics). The first compulsory public education laws were passed in Connecticut (1849) and Massachusetts (1852). A number of utopian experiments and writers flourished in the New England region during the 1800s (e.g. Edward Bellamy's Looking Backward, the Transcendentalism of Emerson and Thoreau, the early anarchism of Josiah Warren and Benjamin Tucker) that would become primary influences on progressivism and socialism alike. This is not the only regional influence as other movements feeding into modern progressivism had their roots in the Midwest (the Greenback Party, the New Harmony community, the battles over abolitionism in Kansas), the West (the debate over land use policy between Gifford Pinchot and John Muir), and the South (the People's Party and Agrarianism).

gollark: Hmm, based on testing™ it can, yes.
gollark: Move above the starting point?
gollark: Is poor quality mode actually *playable*? Even my AI™ cannot seem to actually make the thing go up.
gollark: ```javascriptsetInterval(() => { const nextPipe = pipes[0] const nheight = nextPipe.len + nextPipe.gap() // height is apparently from the top console.log(bird.height, nheight) if (bird.height > (nheight - 100)) { jump = true }}, 100)start()```
gollark: Based on testing of my artificial intelligence™, I think the issue is that it is really stupid and does not look into the future at all.

See also

References

This article is issued from Rationalwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.