Talk:Executioner (5e Background)

Just wanted to say that I really appreciate this contribution to the wiki. Very well made background. --Kydo (talk) 09:43, 2 September 2016 (MDT)

I Know there is a legit place for the executioner background but it makes my head hurt thinking about it. --Redrum 13:22, 28 October 2017 (MDT)

Quality Article Nomination

This article is a current quality article nominee as of 08:34, 17 December 2019 (MST). Quality articles exemplify D&D Wiki's very best work, and therefore must meet the quality article criteria. Please discuss the page's merits below.

Support. The executioner adds an interesting perspective to standard societal interactions. It's well made too. --Green Dragon (talk) 08:34, 17 December 2019 (MST)

Comment: It can use a different, bigger picture. And I think it can also use a specialization table to help add more flavor and variety.--Yanied (talk) 14:19, 28 February 2020 (MST)

gollark: And the objects' types are objects too.

gollark: Regardless, in Python everything is *actually* objects.

gollark: I disagree.

gollark: Python is far more elegant in that way.

gollark: I disagree. It can take lots of internal complexity to present a nice simple interface to users, or a simple thing can be harder to use because you have to do more yourself.

This article is issued from Dandwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.