Talk:Doctor (5e Background)

The main reason I changed the tool proficiency is that I don't think there is a MEDICINE kit.--209.97.85.48 13:08, 26 March 2016 (MDT)

it's unofficial. It's on the wiki. I made it for this background. It just isn't linked. --Kydo (talk) 01:52, 27 March 2016 (MDT)
Kydo, Don't you mean BACKGROUND.--Redrum 18:39, 30 March 2016 (MDT)
Oh. Thank you. Freudian slip. --Kydo (talk) 08:51, 6 April 2016 (MDT)

Wouldn't Herbalism Kit proficiency make more sense considering it's used to make healing potions, and healing kits don't actually require or use a proficiency?

Yes

Quality Article Nomination

This article is a current quality article nominee as of 08:00, 17 December 2019 (MST). Quality articles exemplify D&D Wiki's very best work, and therefore must meet the quality article criteria. Please discuss the page's merits below.
  • Support. Well made, the doctor works well as a background. --Green Dragon (talk) 08:00, 17 December 2019 (MST)
  • Support: This is one of those professions that can actually work well as a background, as opposed to others. It has a good hook for adventure in my experience.--Yanied (talk) 14:03, 28 February 2020 (MST)
  • Opposed: I don't think it is quite ready yet. I think the feature needs some work. I don't buy the "intelligent enemies are less likely to target you" (vague instruction, seems unlikely than an orc would care). The remainder of the feature seems to be similar to the artisan's guild membership, so I think we should work on that aspect. Marasmusine (talk) 06:47, 6 March 2020 (MST)
gollark: Browsers are FAIRLY safe.
gollark: Hence browsers and stuff.
gollark: Well, exactly. Not having baremetal-only programs means you can run untrusted code safely.
gollark: Contribute to PotatOS!
gollark: Or at least a not-entirely-trusted one.
This article is issued from Dandwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.