5e SRD:Bronze Dragon Wyrmling

This material is published under the OGL

Bronze Dragon Wyrmling

Medium dragon, lawful good


Armor Class 17 (natural armor)
Hit Points 32 (5d8 + 10)
Speed 30 ft., fly 60 ft., swim 30 ft.


STR DEX CON INT WIS CHA
17 (+3) 10 (+0) 15 (+2) 12 (+1) 11 (+0) 15 (+2)

Saving Throws Dex +2, Con +4, Wis +2, Cha +4
Skills Perception +4, Stealth +2
Damage Immunities lightning
Senses blindsight 10 ft., darkvision 60 ft., passive Perception 14
Languages Draconic
Challenge 2 (450 XP)


Amphibious. The dragon can breathe air and water.

ACTIONS

Bite. Melee Weapon Attack: +5 to hit, reach 5 ft., one target. Hit: 8 (1d10 + 3) piercing damage.

Breath Weapons (Recharge 5-6). The dragon uses one of the following breath weapons:

Lightning Breath. The dragon exhales lightning in a 40-foot line that is 5 feet wide. Each creature in that line must make a DC 12 Dexterity saving throw, taking 16 (3d10) lightning damage on a failed save, or half as much damage on a successful one.
Repulsion Breath. The dragon exhales repulsion energy in a 30-foot cone. Each creature in that area must succeed on a DC 12 Strength saving throw. On a failed save, the creature is pushed 30 feet away from the dragon.


See 5e SRD:Dragons.



Back to Main Page 5e System Reference Document Creatures Monsters

Open Game Content (place problems on the discussion page).
This is part of the 5e System Reference Document. It is covered by the Open Game License v1.0a, rather than the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3. To distinguish it, these items will have this notice. If you see any page that contains SRD material and does not show this license statement, please contact an admin so that this license statement can be added. It is our intent to work within this license in good faith.
gollark: I think this is conflating vaguely sympathetic/understandable/ethical somewhat.
gollark: According to most ethical theories, that still wouldn't justify killing millions+ of people.
gollark: I think that killing vast numbers of people was still bad, as they could just have not done that and it was an entirely predictable result, personally.
gollark: *All* natural languages are horrible in various ways.
gollark: Solomonoff induction.
This article is issued from Dandwiki. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.