2014 Hungarian parliamentary election

The 2014 Hungarian parliamentary election took place on 6 April 2014.[1] This parliamentary election was the 7th since the 1990 first multi-party election. The result was a victory for the Fidesz–KDNP alliance, preserving its two-thirds majority, with Viktor Orbán remaining Prime Minister.[2] It was the first election under the new Constitution of Hungary which came into force on 1 January 2012. The new electoral law also entered into force that day. For the first time since Hungary's transition to democracy, the election had a single round. The voters elected 199 MPs instead of the previous 386 lawmakers.[3][4]

2014 Hungarian parliamentary election
6 April 2014 (2014-04-06)
All 199 seats in the Országgyűlés
100 seats needed for a majority
Turnout61.73%
  First party Second party
 
Leader Viktor Orbán Attila Mesterházy
Party Fidesz–KDNP Unity
Leader since 17 May 2003 14 January 2014
Last election 263 seats, 52.73% 59 seats, 19.30%
(MSZP only)
Seats won Fidesz 117, KDNP 16 MSZP 29, Others 9
Popular vote 2,264,780 1,290,806
Percentage 44.87% 25.57%
Swing 7.86% 6.27%
  Third party Fourth party
 
Leader Gábor Vona András Schiffer
Party Jobbik LMP
Leader since 25 November 2006 24 March 2013
Last election 47 seats, 16.67% 16 seats, 7.48%
Seats won
Popular vote 1,020,476 269,414
Percentage 20.22% 5.34%
Swing 3.55% 2.14%
Results of the election in all 106 single-member constituencies
Prime Minister before election

Viktor Orbán
Fidesz

 Elected Prime Minister

Viktor Orbán
Fidesz

Background

After the 2010 parliamentary election, Fidesz won a landslide victory, with Viktor Orbán being elected as Prime Minister. As a result of this election, his government was able to alter the National Constitution, as he garnered a two-thirds majority.[5] The government was able to write a constitutional article that favored traditional marriages, as well as one that lowered the number of MPs elected from 386 to 199.[6]

Orbán and his government remained relatively popular in the months leading to the election. This was largely because of high GDP growth, increased industrial output, and a growth in the tourism sector.[7]

New constitution and electoral law

In 2010, a new government led by Fidesz initiated a drafting process for a new constitution.[8][9] On 18 April 2011, parliament approved the constitution on a 262–44 vote, with Fidesz and their Christian Democrat coalition partners in favor and Jobbik opposed. The Hungarian Socialist Party (MSZP) and Politics Can Be Different (LMP), citing the ruling party's unwillingness to compromise on issues and their inability to change the outcome, boycotted both the drafting process and the vote.[10][11] On 25 April, President Pál Schmitt signed the document into law, and it entered into force on the first day of 2012.[12] The enactment came halfway through Hungary's six-month Presidency of the Council of the European Union.[13]

A new electoral law was also passed on 23 December 2011. The Fidesz and its coalition partner Christian Democratic People's Party (KDNP) unilaterally approved the new bill, using their two-thirds majority, ignoring the left-wing opposition's (MSZP and LMP) protests, while Jobbik voted against it. The NGO Political Capital noted in its analysis that the newly-adopted law "shifts the election system towards the majoritarian principle", which may be the cause of possible future "disproportional" outcomes in favour of individual parliamentary seats, resulting an emergence of voting method like first-past-the-post voting (FPTP). Nevertheless, Political Capital also emphasized that this tendency "however [can] not be interpreted as an injury to democracy."[14]

Voter registration plan

On 26 November 2012, Fidesz used its supermajority to pass legislation revising eligibility for voting. Accordingly, the citizens, who had to right to vote, should have been involved in a pre-registration process no later than 15 days before polling day "in order to spare politically indifferent citizens from the election campaign", as Fidesz officials said. According to critics, this process would have made it harder to vote the party out of power, while also threatened free suffrage with the determination of the time limit.[15] Four members of the Democratic Coalition (DK), including its leader, former Prime Minister Ferenc Gyurcsány, had participated in a week-long hunger strike, protesting against the proposed voter registration plan, while President János Áder, who took the office after the resignation of Schmitt and himself was also a Fidesz member, sent the bill to the Constitutional Court.[16]

On 3 January 2013, the Court ruled that the law curtailed voting rights to an "unjustifiable degree", due to the fact that the requirement for voters to register prior to going to the polls applies to every voter. The court also argued the limitation of campaign advertisings into the public broadcasting (Magyar Televízió and its partners), the proposed bans of political advertisements on cinemas during the campaign as well as prohibition of opinion polls in the last six days of the campaign "threatens" the freedom of speech in Hungary, in addition to its unconstitutional nature.[17] After the court's decision the head of the Fidesz parliamentary group, Antal Rogán, announced his party "would drop the proposal" and they will not introduce it for the 2014 parliamentary election, despite the fact that some party members had considered just before the court's ruling that is possible that constitutional amendments can take place in order to pass the bill.[18]

Party splits after 2010 election
Party affiliation in the National Assembly
Affiliation Members
14 May 2010 5 May 2014
Fidesz 227 223
MSZP 59 47
Jobbik 47 43
KDNP 36 34
LMP 16 7
DK – 10
PM – 8
  Independent
1 9
Total number of seats
 386 381

After the 2010 local elections, held on 3 October, Katalin Szili, former Speaker of the National Assembly founded the Social Union party and became its first chairperson. As a result, she quit the Hungarian Socialist Party (MSZP) and the party's parliamentary group, continuing her work as a formally independent MP.[19] In October 2011, a group of members of the MSZP around former Prime Minister Ferenc Gyurcsány left the party and founded the Democratic Coalition (DK) after one year of tension and disagreement. Ten members of the parliament, including Gyurcsány, also left the MSZP parliamentary group and became independent MPs. Gyurcsány said the cause of secession was that the MSZP "had failed in its efforts to transform itself". His former Socialist colleagues strongly condemned his step, as Gyurcsány signed a statement not to quit the party, swearing allegiance to the new party leadership just one week before leaving. At the introduction of his new movement, Gyurcsány called the new constitution as "illegitimate", and charged that all branches of power such as the Constitutional Court, Chief Prosecutor Péter Polt and other units of the judicial system "exclusively serve Viktor Orbán".[20]

Since its establishment and 2010 national election, LMP was kept under pressure (for instance, on the occasion of by-elections) by the Hungarian Socialist Party to achieve some kind of electoral compromise and cooperation against Viktor Orbán's government. The leadership of the LMP positioned the party to the centre, and, as a newcomer, rejected both Fidesz and MSZP's politics. Prominent party member András Schiffer also criticized the previous Socialist cabinets, blaming Gyurcsány's "disastrous governance" for Fidesz winning a two-thirds majority in 2010.[21] However prominent politicians in LMP were divided on the issue of cooperation.[22] During the party's congress in November 2012, LMP decided not to join Together 2014, the planned electoral alliance of opposition parties and movements led by Gordon Bajnai. As a result, Benedek Jávor, a proponent of the agreement, resigned from his position of parliamentary group leader.[23] Jávor and his supporters (including Tímea Szabó and Gergely Karácsony) founded a platform within the party, called "Dialogue for Hungary" on 26 November 2012. The platform argued in favour of conclusion of an electoral agreement with Bajnai's movement in order to replace "Orbán's regime".[24] In January 2013, the LMP's congress rejected again the electoral cooperation with other opposition parties, including Together 2014.[25] As a result, members of the party's "Dialogue for Hungary" platform left LMP to form a new political organization. Benedek Jávor announced the eight leaving MPs would not resign from their parliamentary seats, while seven parliamentarians (Schiffer's supporters) remained in the party.[26] The leaving MPs founded the Dialogue for Hungary as an officially registered party in March 2013.[27] On 8 March 2013, the PM established an electoral coalition with the Together, which was formed as a political party on that day.[28]

In January 2013, two independent MPs who were elected from the Jobbik's national list but were expelled or resigned from the party earlier (Zsolt Endrésik and Ernő Rozgonyi) announced that they would henceforth represent the Hungarian Justice and Life Party (MIÉP) in the National Assembly. MIÉP had parliamentary representation the last time in 2002.[29][30]

Opposition cooperation negotiations

Gordon Bajnai, who served as Prime Minister between 2009 and 2010, preceding Orbán, announced his return to politics on 23 October 2012, during the anti-government demonstration of the One Million for Press Freedom (Milla) non-governmental organization.[31] On the protest, he called for an anti-Orbán coalition so as to form a supermajority in Parliament with the help of which the changes done by Orbán's ruling party, Fidesz could be undone.

In his speech, Bajnai repeatedly used a variant of the term ("We may fail on our own, but together, we shall prove victorious!"),[32] when he proclaimed his support for such a "cooperation between hopeful left-wingers, disappointed rightwingers, politically abandoned free-thinkers and committed Greens" that his organization along with two other civilian body named Together 2014 as a reference to the date of the next general elections in Hungary.[33] In December 2012, Bajnai announced that he intends to become a Member of Parliament in the 2014 national election.[34] Medián polled 22 then 16 percent for the first time to the Together movement among the "certain" voters in their two November surveys. Several scholars criticized the Medián's questioning method which was different from previous ones, suspecting a political intent behind the surveys.[35]

According to plans, Together 2014 would have been an umbrella organization of centre-left parties, similar to the Olive Tree in Italy which established against Silvio Berlusconi's right-wing coalition in 1995. However LMP had rejected the cooperation in November 2012[36] and January 2013,[37] and the Socialists led by Attila Mesterházy gradually took over the initiative. Consequently, the Together movement transformed itself into party on 8 March 2013, as only parties could take part in the election according to the rules.[38] On the same day, the Dialogue for Hungary, which was founded by deserters from the LMP, has established an electoral coalition with the Together.[28]

2013 agreement

In late August 2013, Socialist and Together party leaders agreed to nominate joint individual candidates in each constituency, but would register separate national lists for the upcoming parliamentary election. To avoid the escalation of personal conflicts of interest, they decided not to appoint a joint candidate for the position of Prime Minister; it was announced that party leader, whose party would become the strongest government force following the election, will automatically gain the office. Socialist leader Attila Mesterházy told public television M1 that the electoral alliance between the MSZP and the E14–PM on fielding a single centre-left candidate in each individual constituency provides the right basis for success. Mesterházy and Bajnai agreed MSZP will field candidates in 75 out of all the country's 106 individual constituencies and the E14–PM in the remaining 31.[39] The agreement was sharply criticised by the Democratic Coalition, which was excluded from the cooperation. Gyurcsány called it as a "failure" and said that party leaders Mesterházy and Bajnai "spoofed themselves, us and, finally, the democratic Hungary".[40] Fidesz spokesman Péter Hoppál said this agreement showed that the opposition parties were unable to learn from their own past mistakes. "They were fired by the majority of voters [in 2010] not because they were leftists but because they placed their personal ambitions above the interests of the country", he added.[41]

In September 2013, the Socialist Party declined to sign an election deal with the Democratic Coalition and Gábor Fodor's Hungarian Liberal Party because "both parties presented excessive expectations compared to their social support", according to Attila Mesterházy. The party chairman told a forum held at the party HQ, broadcast by left-wing commercial news channel ATV, that in order to win next year's election, the Socialists need to win over uncertain voters. The party board declared that running with Gyurcsány, one of the most unpopular politicians, would keep uncertain voters away, he added. In response, Gyurcsány said the MSZP had proposed cooperation in four instead of nine constituencies, all of which were impossible to win. In addition they offered every 25th place on their party list and would have banned Gyurcsány himself from running either individually or on a list. Another request was that DK should not present a platform of its own, while nominating its candidates to the MSZP national list. The party could not accept these conditions, the politician said.[42]

2014 agreement
See also: Unity (Hungary)

Gordon Bajnai said on 6 January 2014, he plans to hold talks with Socialist Party on expanding and further developing an agreement between the opposition parties. "We must give back faith in victory to all those that want a change of government. We believe that this requires the closest cooperation, with the possibility of a joint list, between opposition forces with considerable public support. In order to achieve this, each participant must make sacrifices," the party said in a statement sent to MTI, quoting a recent television interview with Bajnai. This meant creating an opportunity to include DK in the electoral cooperation made the last year.[43] Following that the two parties began negotiations to expand their electoral agreement; "we should make every possible effort to oust Fidesz from power, and reach an agreement that would help canvas undecided voters", said Viktor Szigetvári, co-leader of the Together 2014. "There should be a single left-wing candidate in each of the 106 constituencies, and no vote cast on an opposition candidate should go lost", he added.[44]

PartyLeaderIdeologyCandidates
Constituency (106)Party-list (60)
Hungarian Socialist PartyAttila MesterházySocial democracy7142
Together 2014–Dialogue for HungaryGordon Bajnai
Benedek Jávor		Social liberalism
Green liberalism		229
Democratic CoalitionFerenc GyurcsánySocial liberalism136
Hungarian Liberal PartyGábor FodorLiberalism03

Candidates

Registered parties

Individual candidates

The National Election Office announced that a total of 2,304 candidates submitted the required number of nominations for the parliamentary election by the 3 p.m. deadline on 4 March.[45] The candidacy of 1,531 people was accepted after completion of the registration process. The following table contains a selected list of numbers of individual candidates by county representation and party affiliation:

National lists

Under the new election law, parties which ran individual candidates in at least 27 constituencies in Budapest and at least nine counties had the opportunity to set up a national list. On 21 February 2014, the National Election Committee (NVB) registered at first the joint list of the governing Fidesz–KDNP party alliance, led by PM Viktor Orbán and KDNP president Zsolt Semjén.[60]

Eighteen national party lists were registered up to 8 March 2014, when the National Election Office (NVI) approved the following 14 organizations (parties and electoral alliances), in addition to the parliamentary parties (Fidesz–KDNP, Unity, Jobbik and LMP), which had already successfully registered: Homeland Not For Sale Movement Party (HNEM), the communist Hungarian Workers' Party, Party for a Fit and Healthy Hungary (SEM), Andor Schmuck's Social Democratic Civic Party (Soc Dems), the former long-time parliamentary party Independent Smallholders, Agrarian Workers and Civic Party (FKGP), former House Speaker and Socialist party member Katalin Szili's Community for Social Justice People's Party (KTI), Gypsy Party of Hungary (MCP), Party of Greens (Greens), New Dimension Party (ÚDP), New Hungary Party (ÚMP), Together 2014 Party, Democratic Community of Welfare and Freedom (JESZ), Unity Party (ÖP) and Alliance of Mária Seres (SMS).[61] The following table contains only the incumbent parliamentary parties' national lists (first 20 members), which could won mandates:

Minority lists

Under the election law, the thirteen officially recognized national minorities are entitled to send minority spokespersons (Hungarian: nemzetiségi szószólók) to the National Assembly. They have the same rights as other parliamentarians to address the parliament, but are not entitled to vote. However the minorities could also each set up national lists. If any such national list reached the 5% electoral threshold from minority votes, this would entitle them to full-fledged representatives.[67]

The Polish minority list was the first minority list to be successfully registered by the National Election Committee (NVB), on 25 February 2014. Two days later, on 27 February, the NVB registered three other national lists: those for the German, Rusyn and Serb minorities,[67] and then approved the lists of Armenians and Romanians on 1 March,[68] Bulgarians and Slovaks on 3 March, Croats, Ukrainians and Romani people on 4 March, and, finally, Greeks and Slovenes on 7 March.[69]

The officially recognized minority self-government organizations received a total of 298.5 million Ft (EUR 954,000) of public support for campaign activity. The National Roma Council was awarded a significant portion of the funds – altogether 101 million forints – while the Bulgarians granted the lowest amount (8.4 million), according to official demographic ratios.[70]

Opinion polls
This chart illustrates the level of support for the Hungarian government party Fidesz among all eligible voters, as measured by the five polling institutions regularly conducting polling in Hungary, over the year 2013. Since many eligible Hungarian voters expressed no preference for any political party at all, these numbers are significantly lower than those for Fidesz support among decided voters.
This chart illustrates the level of support for the Hungarian government party Fidesz among decided voters, as measured by the five polling institutions regularly conducting polling in Hungary, over the year 2013. Please note the information in the footnotes about the selection and calculation of the Medián and Nézőpont numbers.

Methodological note: The Hungarian pollsters generally release separate data on the support of political parties among all eligible voters (which tends to include a high percentage for "don't know/no preference"), and on the support of political parties among "active" or "certain" voters. The table below refers to the latter data.[lower-alpha 1]

Support for the main Hungarian political parties among decided voters, as measured by the five regular polling institutions. Please note the clarifications about the selection and calculation of the Medián and Nézőpont data, and the calculation of the Unity average for the first month.

Results
Turnout[71]
7:009:0011:0013:0015:0017:30Overall
1.64%9.5%23.23%34.33%45.02%56.77%61.73%
← Summary of the 6 April 2014 Hungarian Parliament election results
Parties and coalitions Party list Constituency Total seats
Votes % ±pp Seats Votes Seats Seats ± % ±pp
Fidesz–KDNP
party alliance		 Fidesz – Hungarian Civic Union (Fidesz) 2,264,78044.877.8630 2,165,34287 117 11066.831.30
Christian Democratic People's Party (KDNP) 7 9 16 20
Unity Hungarian Socialist Party (MSZP) 1,290,80625.576.2721 1,317,8798 29 3019.103.82
Together – Party for a New Era (Együtt) New2 1 3New
Democratic Coalition (DK) New3 1 4New
Dialogue for Hungary (PM) New1 0 1New
Hungarian Liberal Party (MLP) New1 0 1New
Movement for a Better Hungary (Jobbik)1,020,47620.223.55 231,000,637 023 2411.56 0.62
Politics Can Be Different (LMP)269,4145.342.14 5244,191 05 112.51 1.64
Hungarian Workers' Party (Munkáspárt)28,3230.560.45 012,716 00 00 0
The Homeland Not For Sale Movement Party (HNEM)23,5070.47New 023,037 00New0 0
Alliance of Mária Seres (SMS)22,2190.440.45 020,229 00 00 0
Party of Greens (Greens)18,5570.370.37 09,392 00 00 0
Social Democratic Hungarian Civic Party (Soc Dems)15,0730.300.22 012,232 00 00 0
Together 2014 Party14,0850.28New 06,361 00New0 0
Party for a Fit and Healthy Hungary (SEM)12,5630.25New 011,746 00New0 0
Community for Social Justice People's Party (KTI)10,9690.22New 010,551 00New0 0
Democratic Community of Welfare and Freedom (JESZ)9,9250.20New 013,051 00New0 0
Gypsy Party of Hungary (MCP)8,8100.17New 09,030 00New0 0
Independent Smallholders Party (FKgP)8,0830.160.16 07,175 00 00 0
Unity Party (ÖP)6,5520.130.06 06,887 00 00 0
New Dimension Party (ÚDP)2,1000.04New 01,706 00New0 0
New Hungary Party (ÚMP)1,5780.03New 02,018 00New0 0
Others and Independent candidates––– –34,432 00 10 0.26
13 minority lists (needed 22,022 votes/list for a mandate)19,5430.38– –– –––– –
Total (turnout 61.73%) 2.63pp 5,047,363100.00–93 4,908,608106 199 187100–
Source: National Election Office (100.00% reporting)
↓
133 38 23 5
Fidesz–KDNP Unity Jobbik LMP

Party list results by county and in the diaspora
County[72][73] Fidesz-KDNP MSZP-Together-DK-Dialogue-MLP Jobbik LMP Others
Bács-Kiskun 50.21 20.25 21.11 4.56 3.87
Baranya 40.13 27.52 19.51 6.21 6.62
Békés 43.98 23.21 23.15 4.21 5.43
Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén 38.54 24.85 29.45 2.87 4.29
Budapest 38.48 36.75 12.07 8.92 3.78
Csongrád 41.66 27.05 20.20 6.68 4.43
Fejér 45.89 23.23 21.74 5.02 4.11
Győr-Moson-Sopron 51.54 21.88 17.78 5.50 3.29
Hajdú-Bihar 46.03 20.21 25.40 4.38 3.98
Heves 39.22 23.84 30.43 3.42 3.11
Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok 42.35 22.04 28.26 3.44 3.88
Komárom-Esztergom 42.16 28.08 19.92 5.46 4.39
Nógrád 42.91 24.46 24.35 3.10 5.17
Pest 44.75 25.87 18.87 6.11 4.38
Somogy 44.83 24.49 22.97 4.06 3.66
Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg 46.76 21.00 26.10 2.44 3.70
Tolna 46.69 22.55 22.04 4.56 4.18
Vas 51.82 21.94 17.76 5.17 3.30
Veszprém 46.17 24.69 20.55 4.92 3.69
Zala 44.69 22.90 24.81 4.39 3.19
Total in Hungary 43.55 26.21 20.69 5.47 4.09
Diaspora 95.49 1.16 2.28 0.45 0.62
Total 44.87 25.57 20.22 5.34 4.00

Evaluation of the elections

Domestic

Fidesz's leader Viktor Orbán celebrated in Budapest with thousands of supporters in the evening and said that Hungary was on the threshold of a "new and wonderful epoch".

Jobbik leader Gábor Vona said that the party is now the "strongest national radical party" in the EU, as well as Hungary’s second largest political party". Jobbik continuously increases it popularity and ahead of the European parliament elections it is important to make this clear. [Yet even though] we outperformed pollsters’ expectations, but we were not able to achieve the goal we set for ourselves of winning the elections".

One of the five party alliance's leaders, Gordon Bajnai, said the result was a "crushing defeat" and a "great disappointment" for those who wanted change.[74]

International

The Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights Limited Election Observation Mission found that the elections were "efficiently administered and offered voters a diverse choice following an inclusive candidate registration process" but that Fidesz "enjoyed an undue advantage because of restrictive campaign regulations, biased media coverage and campaign activities that blurred the separation between political party and the State".[75]

See also

Notes
  1. In addition, confusingly, two pollsters even publish parallel data on "active" or "certain" voters. Thus, Medián publishes different numbers for the categories of "választani tudók" and "választani tudó "biztos" szavazók", though they do not tend to differ much – the data in the table here generally refers to the latter. Tárki's polling releases always highlight results about "A pártok támogatottsága a pártválasztók körében", and those are included in the table here (and can be reviewed further back into time in this database on their website), but their website also provides a separate database with somewhat different polling data on "A pártok támogatottságának alakulása a biztos szavazó pártválasztók körében". Finally, in February 2013 Nézőpont switched to a system in which it distinguishes between "the entire population" and "active voters", but even the "active voters" sample always includes a percentage of those who are "undecided but favour a change in government" and a percentage of those who are "undecided altogether". Those numbers are given in the footnotes for each Nézőpont poll in the table.
  2. Includes 1% for 4K! – Fourth Republic!.
  3. This poll has 20% undecideds, of which 10% fully undecided and 10% undecided but in favour of a change in government.
  4. This poll has 17% undecideds, of which 9% fully undecided and 8% undecided but in favour of a change in government.
  5. This poll has 15% undecideds, of which 6% fully undecided and 9% undecided but in favour of a change in government.
  6. This poll has 13% undecideds, of which 6% fully undecided and 7% undecided but in favour of a change in government.
  7. This poll has 20.6% undecideds, of which 11.6% fully undecided and 9% undecided but in favour of a change in government.
  8. This poll has 26% undecideds, of which 12% fully undecided and 14% undecided but in favour of a change in government.
  9. This poll has a separate share of undecideds, which Nézőpont usually breaks down between those fully undecided and those undecided but in favour of a change in government. This month that data does not appear to have been published though, but a total of 26% must have fallen in those two categories or expressed support for DK or the smallest parties ("Others").
  10. This poll has 17% undecideds, of which 10% fully undecided and 7% undecided but in favour of a change in government. In addition, this time the Nézőpont poll also provides data for "potenciális szavazók", which add up to 100%, leaving no number of undecided voters. The proportions are substantively different in this data, to the advantage of the MSzP: Fidesz 44%, MSzP 25%, Jobbik 14%, LMP 6%, DK 3%, E2014 7%.
  11. This poll has 18% undecideds, of which 10% fully undecided and 8% undecided but in favour of a change in government. In addition, this time the Nézopont poll also provides data for "potenciális szavazók", which add up to 100%, leaving no number of undecided voters. The proportions are substantively different in this data, to the advantage of the MSzP and E2014: Fidesz 42%, MSzP 23%, Jobbik 13%, LMP 6%, DK 4%, E2014 10%, Others 2%.
  12. This poll has 21% undecideds, of which 16% fully undecided and 5% undecided but in favour of a change in government.
  13. Includes 1% for Hungarian Liberal Party.
  14. This poll has 14% undecideds, of which 12% fully undecided and 2% undecided but in favour of a change in government.
  15. This poll has 14% undecideds, of which 9% fully undecided and 5% undecided but in favour of a change in government.
  16. This poll had 20% undecideds, of which 13% were fully undecided and 7% were undecided but in favour of a change in government. The figures presented represent decided voters.
  17. This poll had 19% undecideds, of which 13% were fully undecided and 6% undecided but in favour of a change in government. The figures presented represent decided voters.
  18. In addition to its polling data, Median provided a forecast for the election results: Fidesz/KDNP 38-44%; Unity 26-32%; Jobbik 21-25%; LMP 3-5%. See http://median.hu/object.cd804c1b-7e19-4376-ac97-b8089b67b753.ivy
  19. This polling data does not include the "active voters" category which Nezopont used (and this table reflected) since February 2013. It only has data for "the entire population", with 27% undecideds and non-voters, and for "potential voters", with no undecideds at all. This table therefore uses the latter data.
  20. In addition to this polling data for decided voters, Ipsos provided a forecast for the election results: Fidesz/KDNP 40-45%; Unity 26-31%; Jobbik 19-23%; LMP 4-6%.

References
  1. "Áder sets date of 2014 election for April 6". 18 January 2014. Archived from the original on 1 February 2014. Retrieved 18 January 2014.
  2. "Hungary election: PM Viktor Orban heads for victory". bbc.
  3. Az országgyűlési képviselők választásáról szóló 2011. évi CCIII. törvény. In.: Magyar Közlöny. 2011. évi, 165. sz., 41095-41099. p.
  4. "Életbe lép az új választójogi törvény". Magyar Nemzet (in Hungarian). 29 December 2011. Archived from the original on 13 May 2012. Retrieved 2 January 2012.
  5. "Q&A Hungary's Controversial Constitutional Changes". bbc.
  6. "New Electoral System in the Home Stretch" (PDF). valasztasirendszer.
  7. "Orban the Unstoppable". The Economist.
  8. "Hungary's new constitution drafted by next March, says Fidesz official" Archived 11 March 2012 at the Wayback Machine, politics.hu, 2 August 2010; accessed 18 August 2010
  9. (in Hungarian) "Bihari szerint mindig lehet jobb" ("According to Bihari, One May Always Do Better"), FN.hu, 7 August 2010; accessed 18 August 2010
  10. Zoltán Simon, "Hungary First to Write a Constitution on IPad, Lawmaker Says", Bloomberg, 4 March 2011; accessed 25 April 2011
  11. "Hungary's parliament passes controversial new constitution", Deutsche Welle, 18 April 2011; accessed 25 April 2011
  12. "Hungarian president signs new constitution despite human rights concerns", Deutsche Welle, 25 April 2011; accessed 25 April 2011
  13. Judy Dempsey, "Hungarian Parliament Approves New Constitution", The New York Times, 18 April 2011; accessed 25 April 2011
  14. "The new electoral law in Hungary: in-depth analysis" (PDF). Political Capital. 3 January 2012. Retrieved 17 January 2014.
  15. Marton Dornbach, Open Access Archivangelism, 30 November 2012 http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/964-Beyond-the-Problem-of-Access-Democracy-Closing-in-Hungary.html
  16. "Former PM Gyurcsány on week-long hunger strike over Fidesz voter registration plan". Archived from the original on 3 October 2017. Retrieved 2 October 2017.
  17. "Hungary top court voids election law in blow to Orban". BBC. 4 January 2013. Retrieved 4 January 2013.
  18. "Gov't backs off on voter registration after Constitutional Court ruling". Budapest Business Journal. 7 January 2013. Retrieved 17 January 2014.
  19. Szili Katalin kilépett az MSZP-frakcióból
  20. "Gyurcsány announces departure from Socialists, formation of new "Western, civic center-left" party". Archived from the original on 14 February 2015. Retrieved 2 October 2017.
  21. "Schiffer nem csókolózott Mesterházyval" (in Hungarian). Index. 25 November 2011. Retrieved 15 October 2014.
  22. Szalay Tamás Lajos (12 July 2011). "Belföld: 'Saját fegyverével kell felszámolni a Fidesz rendszerét' - NOL.hu". NOL.hu. Retrieved 14 February 2015.
  23. "Beintett Bajnainak az LMP, lemondott Jávor Benedek". 18 November 2012. Retrieved 18 November 2012.
  24. "LMP fails to elect new parliamentary group leader as split in party continues". 26 November 2012. Archived from the original on 16 January 2013. Retrieved 27 November 2012.
  25. "LMP rejects proposals for new strategy at party congress". 27 January 2013. Archived from the original on 27 September 2013. Retrieved 8 February 2013.
  26. "LMP splits over cooperation with Together 2014; caucus may remain intact". 28 January 2013. Archived from the original on 2 February 2014. Retrieved 8 February 2013.
  27. "LMP rebels to establish Dialogue for Hungary as a full-fledged party". 4 February 2013. Archived from the original on 27 September 2013. Retrieved 8 February 2013.
  28. "Former PM Bajnai's political movement officially forms political party". 9 March 2013. Archived from the original on 2 February 2014. Retrieved 9 March 2013.
  29. "Ex-Jobbik MPs stick to right with MIÉP". Archived from the original on 9 March 2016. Retrieved 2 October 2017.
  30. "Justice and Life Party revival may dent Jobbik's chances in 2014". Archived from the original on 3 October 2017. Retrieved 2 October 2017.
  31. ""Bajnai said to announce return to politics on October 23"". Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 3 October 2017.
  32. Gordon Bajnai's speech as published on the home page of his organization Archived 16 January 2014 at the Wayback Machine
  33. BBC News - Mass rallies mark 1956 Hungary uprising
  34. "Bajnai says plans to run for Parliament; in car accident in Budapest". Archived from the original on 14 February 2015. Retrieved 3 October 2017.
  35. "Medián: Bajnaiék lehetnek a legnagyobb ellenzéki erő". 7 November 2012. Retrieved 18 October 2017.
  36. Az LMP nemet mondott Bajnaiéknak – Index, 2012-11-18
  37. Szétszakadt az LMP – Index, 2013-01-27
  38. Párttá alakult az Együtt 2014 - közismert arcok a vezetőségben Archived 21 October 2014 at the Wayback Machine – Híradó.hu, 2013-03-08
  39. "Se Bajnai, se Mesterházy nem lesz miniszterelnök-jelölt". 29 August 2013. Retrieved 26 February 2018.
  40. "Gyurcsány: Gyerekek, ez nem jött össze". 29 August 2013. Retrieved 26 February 2018.
  41. "Fidesz: a bukott baloldal szavatossága járt le". 29 August 2013. Retrieved 26 February 2018.
  42. "Gyurcsány Ferencet és három párttársát nem akarta listán látni az MSZP". 10 September 2013. Retrieved 26 February 2018.
  43. "Gyurcsányt mégis beveszik a balliberális összefogásba?". 6 January 2014. Retrieved 14 March 2018.
  44. "Socialists, E-PM discuss expanding electoral agreement". 7 January 2014. Archived from the original on 8 January 2014. Retrieved 8 January 2014.
  45. "Monday deadline sees 2,300 candidates registered for general election". 4 March 2014. Archived from the original on 11 January 2015. Retrieved 4 March 2014.
  46. "Nyilvántartásba vett jelöltet, listát állító jelölőszervezetek (Egyéni jelöltek száma)" (in Hungarian). National Election Office. 19 February 2014. Retrieved 19 February 2014.
  47. "Országos jelölt és lista állítási statisztika a nyilvántartásba vett jelöltekről, listákról" (in Hungarian). National Election Office. 19 February 2014. Retrieved 19 February 2014.
  48. "FIDESZ–KDNP által állított nyilvántartásba vett jelöltek és listák" (in Hungarian). National Election Office. 19 February 2014. Retrieved 19 February 2014.
  49. "MSZP–EGYÜTT–DK–PM–MLP által állított nyilvántartásba vett jelöltek és listák" (in Hungarian). National Election Office. 19 February 2014. Retrieved 19 February 2014.
  50. "JOBBIK által állított nyilvántartásba vett jelöltek és listák" (in Hungarian). National Election Office. 19 February 2014. Retrieved 19 February 2014.
  51. "LMP által állított nyilvántartásba vett jelöltek és listák" (in Hungarian). National Election Office. 19 February 2014. Retrieved 19 February 2014.
  52. "Szociáldemokraták által állított nyilvántartásba vett jelöltek és listák" (in Hungarian). National Election Office. 19 February 2014. Retrieved 19 February 2014.
  53. "Soc Dems által állított nyilvántartásba vett jelöltek és listák" (in Hungarian). National Election Office. 19 February 2014. Retrieved 19 February 2014.
  54. "SMS által állított nyilvántartásba vett jelöltek és listák" (in Hungarian). National Election Office. 19 February 2014. Retrieved 19 February 2014.
  55. "HNEM által állított nyilvántartásba vett jelöltek és listák" (in Hungarian). National Election Office. 19 February 2014. Retrieved 19 February 2014.
  56. "ÖP által állított nyilvántartásba vett jelöltek és listák" (in Hungarian). National Election Office. 19 February 2014. Retrieved 19 February 2014.
  57. "KTI által állított nyilvántartásba vett jelöltek és listák" (in Hungarian). National Election Office. 19 February 2014. Retrieved 19 February 2014.
  58. "FKGP által állított nyilvántartásba vett jelöltek és listák" (in Hungarian). National Election Office. 19 February 2014. Retrieved 19 February 2014.
  59. "Munkáspárt által állított nyilvántartásba vett jelöltek és listák" (in Hungarian). National Election Office. 19 February 2014. Retrieved 19 February 2014.
  60. "Fidesz-Christian Democrats national list first to be registered for April election". 23 February 2014. Archived from the original on 2 March 2014. Retrieved 28 February 2014.
  61. "Eighteen national party lists registered". 8 March 2014. Archived from the original on 8 March 2014. Retrieved 8 March 2014.
  62. "Országos listák" (in Hungarian). National Election Office. 27 February 2014. Retrieved 27 February 2014.
  63. "FIDESZ–KDNP országos listája" (in Hungarian). National Election Office. 21 February 2014. Retrieved 21 February 2014.
  64. "MSZP-EGYÜTT-DK-PM-MLP országos listája" (in Hungarian). National Election Office. 25 February 2014. Retrieved 25 February 2014.
  65. "JOBBIK országos listája" (in Hungarian). National Election Office. 1 March 2014. Retrieved 1 March 2014.
  66. "LMP országos listája" (in Hungarian). National Election Office. 3 March 2014. Retrieved 3 March 2014.
  67. "Three national minority lists registered for April 6". 28 February 2014. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 2 March 2014.
  68. "Nyilvántartásba vette az örmény és a román nemzetiség országos listáját az NVB". 1 March 2014. Retrieved 2 March 2014.
  69. "Mind a 13 nemzetiség országos listáját nyilvántartásba vették". 7 March 2014. Retrieved 7 March 2014.
  70. "State awards minority self-governments HUF 300 million campaign financing". 11 March 2014. Archived from the original on 12 March 2014. Retrieved 11 March 2014.
  71. "Tájékoztató adatok a választáson megjelentek számáról és arányáról" (in Hungarian). National Election Office. Archived from the original on 9 April 2014. Retrieved 6 April 2014.
  72. "Térkép".
  73. "Az országos listás választás eredménye".
  74. "Hungary election: Concerns as neo-Nazi Jobbik party wins 20% of vote". 7 April 2014. Retrieved 8 April 2014.
  75. "OSCE/ODIHR Limited Election Observation Mission Final Report". OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights. Retrieved 1 November 2014.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.