Zeitgeist (Levellers album)

Zeitgeist is the fourth album by the Levellers. It was released in 1995 and reached #1 in the UK album charts, making it the band's most successful album. Two singles were released from the album – "Hope St.", which reached #12 in the UK single charts, and "Fantasy", which reached 16. Additionally, a re-recorded version of "Just the One" featuring Joe Strummer was released, reaching #12, as well as a live version of "Exodus" from the later Headlights, White Lines, Black Tar Rivers (Best Live) album the next year, which reached #24.

Zeitgeist
Studio album by
Levellers
Released28 August 1995
GenreRock, alternative rock, folk punk
Length46:41
LabelChina
ProducerAl Scott
Levellers chronology
Levellers
(1993)		 Zeitgeist
(1995)		 Mouth to Mouth
(1997)
Professional ratings
Review scores
SourceRating
Allmusic [1]

Track listing
  1. "Hope St."
  2. "The Fear"
  3. "Exodus"
  4. "Maid of the River"
  5. "Saturday to Sunday"
  6. "4 a.m."
  7. "Forgotten Ground"
  8. "Fantasy"
  9. "P.C. Keen"
  10. "Just the One"
  11. "Haven't Made It"
  12. "Leave This Town"
  13. "Men-an-Tol"

The 2007 re-issue included the bonus tracks:

  1. "Miles Away"
  2. "Your 'Ouse"
  3. "Drinking for England"
  4. "Searchlights"

Personnel

Musicians
  • Mark Chadwick - Guitars, vocals
  • Charlie Heather - Drums/percussion
  • Jeremy Cunningham - Bass guitar, artwork
  • Simon Friend - Guitars, vocals, mandolin
  • Jonathan Sevink - Fiddle

Guest musicians

gollark: Apparently, if you integrate the "characteristic function of the rational numbers" (1 if rational, 0 otherwise) from 0 to 1, you will attain 1, because x is always rational (because b - a is 1, and all the partitions are the same size), even though it should be 0.
gollark: For another thing, as I found out while reading a complaint by mathematicians about the use of Riemann integrals over gauge integrals, if you always take the point to "sample" as the left/right/center of each partition *and* the thing is evenly divided up into partitions, it's actually wrong in some circumstances.
gollark: For one thing, the sum operator is very bee there because it does not appear to be counting integers.
gollark: It's wrong and abuse-of-notationy however.
gollark: And this isn't even *used anywhere* except that one or two of the integration questions use this as an extra layer of indirection.

References
  1. https://www.allmusic.com/album/r220829
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.