Zeeman slower

A Zeeman slower or Zeeman decelerator is a scientific apparatus that is commonly used in quantum optics to cool a beam of atoms from room temperature or above to a few kelvins. At the entrance of the Zeeman slower the average speed of atoms is on the order of a few hundred m/s. The spread of velocity is also in the order of a few hundred m/s. Final speed at the exit of the slower is few 10 m/s with an even smaller spread.

A Zeeman slower

A Zeeman slower consists of a cylinder, through which the beam travels, a pump laser that is shone on the beam in the direction opposite to the beam's motion, and a magnetic field (commonly produced by a solenoid-like coil) that points along the symmetry axis of the cylinder and varies spatially along the axis of the cylinder. The pump laser, which is required to be near-resonant to an atomic or molecular transition, Doppler slows a certain velocity class within the velocity distribution of the beam. The spatially varying Zeeman shift of the resonant frequency enables lower and lower velocity classes to be resonant with the laser, as the atomic or molecular beam propagates along the slower, hence slowing the beam.

History

It was first developed by William D. Phillips (who was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics for this discovery in 1997 together with Steven Chu and Claude Cohen-Tannoudji "for development of methods to cool and trap atoms with laser light"[1]) and Harold J. Metcalf.[2] The achievement of these low temperatures led the way for the experimental realisation of Bose–Einstein condensation, and a Zeeman slower can be part of such an apparatus.

Principle

According to the principles of Doppler cooling, an atom modelled as a two-level atom can be cooled using a laser. If it moves in a specific direction and encounters a counter-propagating laser beam resonant with its transition, it is very likely to absorb a photon. The absorption of this photon gives the atom a "kick" in the direction that is consistent with momentum conservation and brings the atom to its excited state. However, this state is unstable and some time later the atom decays back to its ground state via spontaneous emission (after a time on the order of nanoseconds, for example in Rubidium 87 the excited state of the D2 transition has a lifetime of 26.2 ns[3]). The photon will be reemitted (and the atom will again increase its speed), but its direction will be random. When averaging over a large number of these processes applied to one atom, one sees that the absorption process decreases the speed always in the same direction (as the absorbed photon comes from a monodirectional source), whereas the emission process does not lead to any change in the speed of the atom because the emission direction is random. Thus the atom is being effectively slowed down by the laser beam.

There is nevertheless a problem in this basic scheme because of the Doppler effect. The resonance of the atom is rather narrow (on the order of a few megaHertz), and after having decreased its momentum by a few recoil momenta, it is no longer in resonance with the pump beam because in its frame, the frequency of the laser has shifted. The Zeeman slower[4] uses the fact that a magnetic field can change the resonance frequency of an atom using the Zeeman effect to tackle this problem.

The average acceleration (due to many photon absorption events over time) of an atom with mass, ${\displaystyle M}$, a cycling transition with frequency, ${\displaystyle \omega =ck+\delta }$, and linewidth, ${\displaystyle \gamma }$, that is in the presence of a laser beam that has wavenumber, ${\displaystyle k}$, and intensity ${\displaystyle I=s_{0}I_{s}}$ (where ${\displaystyle I_{s}=\hbar c\gamma k^{3}/12\pi }$ is the saturation intensity of the laser) is

${\displaystyle {\vec {a}}={\frac {\hbar {\vec {k}}\gamma }{2M}}{\frac {s_{0}}{1+s_{0}+\left(2\delta '/\gamma \right)^{2}}}}$

In the rest frame of the atoms with velocity, ${\displaystyle v}$, in the atomic beam, the frequency of the laser beam is shifted by ${\displaystyle k_{L}v}$. In the presence of a magnetic field ${\displaystyle B}$, the atomic transition is Zeeman shifted by an amount ${\displaystyle \mu 'B/\hbar }$ (where ${\displaystyle \mu '}$ is the magnetic moment of the transition). Thus, the effective detuning of the laser from the zero-field resonant frequency of the atoms is

${\displaystyle \delta '=\delta +kv-{\frac {\mu 'B}{\hbar }}}$

The atoms for which ${\displaystyle \delta '=0}$ will experience the largest acceleration, namely

${\displaystyle a=\eta a_{max}}$

where ${\displaystyle \eta =s_{0}/(1+s_{0})}$ and ${\displaystyle a_{max}={\frac {\hbar k\gamma }{2M}}}$.

The most common approach is to require that we have a magnetic field profile that varies in the ${\displaystyle z}$ direction such that the atoms experience a constant acceleration ${\displaystyle a=\eta a_{max}}$ as they fly along the axis of the slower. It has been recently shown however, that a different approach yields better results.[5]

In the constant deceleration approach we get:

${\displaystyle v\left(z\right)={\sqrt {v_{i}^{2}-2az}}}$

${\displaystyle B\left(z\right)={\frac {\hbar k}{\mu '}}v+{\frac {\hbar \delta }{\mu '}}={\frac {\hbar kv_{i}}{\mu '}}{\sqrt {1-{\frac {2a}{v_{i}^{2}}}z}}+{\frac {\hbar \delta }{\mu '}}}$

where ${\displaystyle v_{i}}$ is the maximum velocity class that will be slowed; all the atoms in the velocity distribution that have velocities ${\displaystyle v<v_{i}}$ will be slowed, and those with velocities ${\displaystyle v>v_{i}}$ will not be slowed at all. The parameter ${\displaystyle \eta }$ (which determines the required laser intensity) is normally chosen to be around .5. If a Zeeman slower were to be operated with ${\displaystyle \eta \approx 1}$, then after absorbing a photon and moving to the excited state, the atom would then preferentially re-emit a photon in the direction of the laser beam (due to stimulated emission) which would counteract the slowing process.

Realization

The required form of the spatially inhomogeneous magnetic field as we showed above has the form

${\displaystyle B(z)=B_{0}+B_{a}{\sqrt {1-z/z_{0}}}}$

This field can be realized a few different ways. The most popular design requires wrapping a current carrying wire with many layered windings where the field is strongest (around 20-50 windings) and few windings where the field is weak. Alternative designs include: a single layer coil that varies in the pitch of the winding.[6] an array of permanent magnets in various configurations,[7][8][9][10]

Outgoing atoms

The Zeeman slower is usually used as a preliminary step to cool the atoms in order to trap them in a magneto-optical trap. Thus it aims at a final velocity of about 10 m/s (depending on the atom used), starting with a beam of atoms with a velocity of a few hundred meters per second. The final speed to be reached is a compromise between the technical difficulty of having a long Zeeman slower and the maximal speed allowed for an efficient loading into the trap.

A limitation of setup can be the transverse heating of the beam.[11] It is linked to the fluctuations of the speed along the three axis around its mean values, since the final speed was said to be an average over a large number of processes. These fluctuations are linked to the atom having a Brownian motion due to the random reemission of the absorbed photon. They may cause difficulties when loading the atoms in the next trap.

References

1. Nobel prize in physics press release, 1997
2. Phillips, William D.; Metcalf, Harold (1982-03-01). "Laser Deceleration of an Atomic Beam". Physical Review Letters. American Physical Society (APS). 48 (9): 596–599. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.48.596. ISSN 0031-9007.
3. Alkali D line Data, D. A. Steck
4. Bill Phillips' Nobel lecture
5. B Ohayon., G Ron. (2013). "New approaches in designing a Zeeman Slower". Journal of Instrumentation. 8 (2): P02016. arXiv:1212.2109. Bibcode:2013JInst...8P2016O. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/8/02/P02016.
6. Bell, S. C.; Junker, M.; Jasperse, M.; Turner, L. D.; Lin, Y.-J.; Spielman, I. B.; Scholten, R. E. (2010). "A slow atom source using a collimated effusive oven and a single-layer variable pitch coil Zeeman slower". Review of Scientific Instruments. AIP Publishing. 81 (1): 013105. doi:10.1063/1.3276712. ISSN 0034-6748.
7. Cheiney, P; Carraz, O; Bartoszek-Bober, D; Faure, S; Vermersch, F; Fabre, C. M; Gattobigio, G. L; Lahaye, T; Guéry-Odelin, D; Mathevet, R (2011). "A Zeeman slower design with permanent magnets in a Halbach configuration". Review of Scientific Instruments. 82 (6): 063115–063115–7. arXiv:1101.3243. Bibcode:2011RScI...82f3115C. doi:10.1063/1.3600897. PMID 21721682.
8. Reinaudi, G.; Osborn, C. B.; Bega, K.; Zelevinsky, T. (2012-03-20). "Dynamically configurable and optimizable Zeeman slower using permanent magnets and servomotors". Journal of the Optical Society of America B. 29 (4): 729. arXiv:1110.5351. doi:10.1364/josab.29.000729. ISSN 0740-3224.
9. Lebedev, V; Weld, D M (2014-07-28). "Self-assembled Zeeman slower based on spherical permanent magnets". Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics. 47 (15): 155003. arXiv:1407.5372. doi:10.1088/0953-4075/47/15/155003. ISSN 0953-4075.
10. Krzyzewski, S. P.; Akin, T. G.; Dahal, Parshuram; Abraham, E. R. I. (October 2014). "A clip-on Zeeman slower using toroidal permanent magnets". Review of Scientific Instruments. 85 (10): 103104. doi:10.1063/1.4897151. ISSN 0034-6748. PMID 25362368.
11. K. Günter Design and implementation of a Zeeman slower for Rb 87