Yirrkala bark petitions

The Yirrkala bark petitions, sent by the Yolngu people of Arnhem Land to the Australian Parliament in 1963, were the first traditional documents prepared by Indigenous Australians that were recognised by the Australian Parliament, and the first documentary recognition of Indigenous people in Australian law. The petitions asserted that the Yolngu people owned land over which the federal government had granted mining rights to a private company, Nabalco.

In 1971 the court decided that the ordinances and mining leases were valid, and that the Yolgnu people were not able to establish their native title at common law, in a decision known as the Milirrpum decision, or the Gove land rights case.

History

Wali Wunungmurra, one of the 12 signatories to the petitions, describes the background to the petitions as follows:

"In the late 1950s Yolngu became aware of people prospecting for minerals in the area of the Gove Peninsula, and shortly after, discovered that mining leases had been taken out over a considerable area of our traditional land. Our response, in 1963, was to send a petition framed by painted bark to the Commonwealth Government demanding that our rights be recognised."[1]

The Yolngu, an Aboriginal Australian people of Yirrkala sent the bark petitions to the Australian House of Representatives where they were tabled on 14 and 28 August 1963. The petitions were written in the Yolngu language, together with an English translation.[2] They are on permanent display at Parliament House, Canberra.[3]

The bark petitions asserted that the Yolngu people owned the land and protested the Commonwealth's granting of mining rights to Nabalco of land excised from the Arnhem Aboriginal Land reserve.[4] The son of one of the Yirrkala plaintiffs, a Gumatj clan leader, Munggurrawuy, was Galarrwuy Yunupingu who assisted in drafting the petitions.

The petitions stated that "the land in question has been hunting and food gathering land for the Yirrkala tribes from time immemorial" and "that places sacred to the Yirrkala people, as well as vital to their livelihood are in the excised land". They expressed the petitioners' "fear that their needs and interests will be completely ignored as they have been ignored in the past". The petitions called on the House of Representatives to "appoint a Committee, accompanied by competent interpreters, to hear the views of the people of Yirrkala before permitting the excision" of the land for the mine and to ensure "that no arrangements be entered into with any company which will destroy the livelihood and independence of the Yirrkala people". Thus, the petitions are the first formal assertion of native title.

The Australian Government's response was to establish the House of Representatives Select Committee on Grievances of the Yirrkala Aborigines, Arnhem Land Reserve in 1963. In its report, the Select Committee recommended that the Yirrkala people should be compensated for loss of their traditional occupancy, by way of (1) land grant; (2) payment of at least the first A$300,000 received in mining royalties; and (3) direct monetary compensation, even though Aboriginal land rights were not expressly recognised under Northern Territory laws.[5]

However, the recommendations of the House of Representatives Select Committee regarding compensation payments were ignored in the Mining (Gove Peninsula Nabalco Agreement) Ordinance 1968 (NT)[6], which unilaterally revoked part of the Yirrkala Aboriginal reserve in order to enable Nabalco to develop the mine.

The Aboriginal clans whose traditional lands were affected by the Gove project were so strongly opposed to the making of the Mining (Gove Peninsula Nabalco Agreement) Ordinance 1968 that they challenged it in the Supreme Court of the Northern Territory in 1968 in Milirrpum v Nabalco Pty Ltd ( the "Gove land rights case"). In 1971 Justice Richard Blackburn held that the ordinances and mining leases were valid and that the Yolgnu people were not able to establish their native title at common law. Justice Blackburn used the notion of terra nullius to justify this ruling, stating that the "doctrine of communal native title does not form and never has formed, part of the law of any part of Australia".[7]

The Milirrpum decision had wide-ranging impacts on relations between Aboriginal people and the mining industry generally throughout Australia.[8] In response to the Milirrpum decision, in 1973 the Whitlam government established the Aboriginal Land Rights Commission, headed by Justice Edward Woodward,[9] to inquire into "the appropriate means to recognise and establish the traditional rights and interests of the Aborigines in and in relation to the land, and to satisfy in other ways the reasonable aspirations of the Aborigines to rights in or in relation to land".[10]

Significance

The 1963 Yirrkala petitions were the first traditional documents prepared by Indigenous Australians recognised by the Australian Parliament, and are the first documentary recognition of Indigenous people in Australian law.[3]

gollark: Sad!
gollark: LyricLy gets some money for no work, the person gets their shady thing, gnobody gets TONS of money purchasing-power-wise.
gollark: LyricLy take the job, make gnobody do it, pay gnobody half.
gollark: The solution here is obvious, actually.
gollark: I think you underestimate the difficulty of finding a job. And here there is a LOWER minimum wage for young people because government beeoid.

See also

References
  1. "Journey goes full circle from Bark Petition to Blue Mud Bay". Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 23 June 2009.
  2. "Novel Plea By Tribal Group". The Canberra Times: 3. 15 August 1963. Retrieved 9 July 2017.
  3. "Yirrkala bark petitions 1963 (Cth)". Documenting A Democracy. Museum of Australian Democracy. Retrieved 24 January 2020.
  4. The text of the Bark Petitions is available here.
  5. Australia. Parliament. House of Representatives, "Report of the Select Committee on Grievances of the Yirrkala Aborigines, Arnhem Land Reserve", Australian Government Printer, Canberra, 1963, at paragraphs 70, 72, 74
  6. Mining (Gove Peninsula Nabalco Agreement) Ordinance 1968 (NT)
  7. For an account of these developments, see Anne M Fitzgerald "Mining Agreements: Negotiated Outcomes in the Australian Minerals Sector" 2002, at pp 207-212
  8. R Howitt, J Connel and P Hirsh (eds), "Resources, Nations and Indigenous Peoples", Oxford University Press, Melbourne, 1996 at pp 17-18.
  9. Justice Edward Woodward
  10. Justice Woodward, "Aboriginal Land Rights Commission, First Report", Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1973 at p iii.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.