Yellapragada Sudershan Rao

Yellapragada Sudershan Rao is an Indian historian, who was appointed as the chairperson of the Indian Council of Historical Research (ICHR) by the Government of India, from July 2014 to July 2017.[1] He was formerly a professor of history at Kakatiya University in Telangana and a member of ICHR along with being the head of a state chapter of ABISY.

Prior to appointment, he was a hardly visible scholar with nil publication in any peer-reviewed media.[2] Scholarly reception of his works, ICHR appointment, and tenure have been negative. Scholars have noted him to have sympathies towards Hindutva.[3]

Early life

Rao's ancestral home is at Kollapur, Telangana.[4]

Career

Academia

Prior to his appointment, Rao was a professor of history at Kakatiya University in Telangana; he was the erstwhile head of the department (1988-1992) and formerly dean of the school of Social Sciences.[5][6][7]

Rao claims to specialize in ancient Indian culture, with an emphasis on the history of Hinduism.[8] A report in The Hindu claimed that he has published over forty research papers in various journals and contributed to the Andhra Pradesh History Congress besides guiding eight PhD students.[6]

ICHR

Rao was a member of the Indian Council of Historical Research (ICHR) during the Vajpayee Government (2000-2002)[9] and had also served as head of the Andhra Pradesh chapter of Akhil Bharatiya Itihas Sankalan Yojana (ABISY), a subsidiary organisation of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, devoted to rewriting Indian history from a Hindu nationalist perspective.[8][9][10]

In July 2014, the National Democratic Alliance government re-inducted Rao into ICHR and appointed him as the chairperson, as well.[8] After serving as chairperson for 16 months, Rao was reported to have submitted a resignation from his position on 24 November 2015, citing personal reasons.[11] However, the government did not accept the resignation.[12]

Views and reception

In his interviews before media, at the time of appointment, Rao advocated for treating folklore et al at par with archaeological evidence whilst asserting of the Hindu epics to be actual historical events, in that it has occupied the collective memory of people for a long spans of time and hence, may not be lensed through the western constructs of mythology; he also spoke of the need to conduct renewed research about the epics and construct a sketch of the prevalent socio-cultural systems, from therein.[13][14] He also emphasized upon the need of abandoning the western and marxist tools of historiography in a bid to rewrite Indian history from a nationalist perspective with due appreciation of cultural ethos.[13][15] Rao also asserted of the presence of sufficient archaeological evidence confirming the presence of a demolished temple at the Babri Masjid site and of a Hindu civilization at the sites of Ayodhya circa 800 B.C.[9]

Rao had been involved in one such project, that attempts to rewrite Indian history from the viewpoint of Mahabharata, under the aegis of Sanathana Dharma Charitable Trust.[4] He has been also working on other projects to document tribal history.[4]

Reacting to his appointment, eminent historian Romila Thapar questioned the academic rigor of Rao's work and stated that while he may have "published popular articles on the historicity of the Indian epics", none of his work were published in peer-reviewed journals and thus, his work had little visibility to historians.[16][17] Thapar went on to criticize Rao's intentions of ascribing historicity about the Hindu epics as a futile endeavor and deemed his' comments about Babri Masjid, as politically motivated; in response to Rao's call of removing Marxist tools of historiography from ICHR, she posited that Rao, like most of his fellow travelers of the Hindutva bandwagon, had little idea of the Marxist methodologies and deemed any established rigorous method in the social sciences that ran contrary to Hindu nationalistic goals, to be Marxist, by default.[17]

His appointment was also criticized by other eminent historians including D. N. Jha et al and former members of the ICHR, even including those sympathetic to the ruling party.[18][19][20] An Outlook article noted that he was a scarcely cited scholar with no established track-record and that his blog-posts on different aspects of the subject, which frequently delineated the boundaries between myth and history and ran on a course of faith alone, have only caused concern among academics.[21] He was (though) supported by M. G. S. Narayanan, a former ICHR chairperson, appointed during the previous NDA tenure.[22] Ramachandra Guha noted him to be a right wing ideologue, who did not recognize the difference between history and myth.[23]

His tenure at ICHR has been subject to sharp criticism.[24][25] He has advocated for the fringe theory of Indigenous Aryans, rejecting the Indo-Aryan migration as a product of colonized mind[26][15] and has allegedly sought for research projects on Akhand Bharat.[27] During his chairmanship, ICHR has been said to be linked with projects that seek to set back the chronological time-span of Vedas in the broader quest of present day sociopolitical goals[26] and he has asserted of David Frawley as a serious scholar of Vedic literature, in defense of his decision to invite a fringe pseudo-historian to an ICHR event.[28] Gopinath Ravindran, a fellow member resigned from the committee in 2015 alluding to Rao's autocratic ways as well as intolerance of dissent and criticized the credentials of his scholarship, whilst pointing to the increasing saffronisation of ICHR.[29][30] Rao rejected the allegations and deemed Ravindran's criticism of the academic credentials of appointees to ICHR of having stemmed from an inability to revisit the version of history, perpetuated by Marxist historians.[25] He has recommended fellow ABISY office-bearers, subscribing to his thought-schools, to the ICHR council.[31] Rao had also announced of plans to study whether Adam's Bridge was a man-made structure, which was shelved after he retired.[32][33]

gollark: The server here runs on an actual high-power... server... with 4 Neoverse-N1 cores, lots of fast RAM, etc. Raspberry Pis have 8GB of RAM at most, and it's slower LPDDR4, and it has half the clocks, and Cortex-A73s, which are worse.
gollark: Raspberry Pis *can* run servers, it would just be bad.
gollark: And that probably gives at most 50% more.
gollark: If you want more single-threaded performance, then you probably need something dedicated, which would rapidly become ultrahyperexpensive.
gollark: If ~~I~~ you want a *better* one, it will probably cost actual money, and Minecraft is unlikely to benefit much from more cores.

References
  1. "List of Chairpersons of Indian Council of Historical Research". ichr.ac.in. Retrieved 22 October 2019.
  2. Maiorano, Diego (3 April 2015). "Early Trends and Prospects for Modi's Prime Ministership". The International Spectator. 50 (2): 75–92. doi:10.1080/03932729.2015.1024511. ISSN 0393-2729.
  3. Tharamangalam, Joseph (2 July 2016). "Moditva in India: a threat to inclusive growth and democracy". Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue canadienne d'études du développement. 37 (3): 298–315. doi:10.1080/02255189.2016.1196656. ISSN 0225-5189.
  4. "Prof Yellapragada Sudershan Rao; the new chairperson of Indian Council of Historical Research". Vishwa Samvada Kendra. 3 July 2014. Retrieved 29 November 2019.
  5. "Department of History and Tourism Management". Kakatiya University. Retrieved 17 September 2014.
  6. "He aims to present history in a new perspective". The Hindu. 26 June 2014. Retrieved 20 August 2014.
  7. Bailey, Greg (2 October 2014). "Indology after Hindutva". South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies. 37 (4): 700–707. doi:10.1080/00856401.2014.959241. ISSN 0085-6401.
  8. Akshaya Mukul (3 July 2014). "RSS man will head historical research body". The Times of India. Retrieved 17 September 2014.
  9. "Mahabharat historian gets research reins". www.telegraphindia.com. Retrieved 22 October 2019.
  10. "Vision India: Modi, RSS on collision course but who'll blink first?". Firstpost. 18 August 2014.
  11. Chopra, Ritika (28 November 2015). "No honorarium, ICHR chief Sudershan Rao quits". Indian Express. Retrieved 28 November 2015.
  12. HRD may ask Y Sudershan Rao to remain ICHR chief, The Indian Express, 2 April 2016.
  13. "'Ramayana, Mahabharata Are True Accounts Of The Period...Not Myths' : The new chairman of ICHR argues that faith and reason can go hand in hand in the writing of history. -- Outlook Interviews Yellapragada Sudershan Rao". Outlook India. 21 July 2014. Retrieved 22 October 2019.
  14. Kinnvall, Catarina (4 May 2019). "Populism, ontological insecurity and Hindutva: Modi and the masculinization of Indian politics". Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 32 (3): 283–302. doi:10.1080/09557571.2019.1588851. ISSN 0955-7571.
  15. Chopra, Ritika (17 November 2014). "Ramayan, Mahabharat historical sources, West dubs them myth: Y Sudershan Rao". The Economic Times. Retrieved 23 October 2019.
  16. "Historians raise questions about ICHR's new boss Prof Y Sudershan Rao". Firstpost. 14 July 2014. Retrieved 20 August 2014.
  17. Thapar, Romila (11 July 2014). "The appointment of a historian whose work is unfamiliar to most historians shows scant regard for the impressive scholarship that now characterises the study of Indian History and this disregard may stultify future academic research". India Today. Retrieved 22 October 2019.
  18. "Choice of ICHR chief reignites saffronisation debate". The Hindu. 16 July 2014. Retrieved 20 August 2014.
  19. "Right-wingers question ICHR chief selection". The Times of India. 18 July 2014. Retrieved 20 August 2014.
  20. Saint-Mézard, Isabelle (February 2016). "L'Inde de Narendra Modi : Des tendances préoccupantes aux plans culturels et confessionnels". Études. 2: 7–18.
  21. Raman, Anuradha (21 July 2014). "Ram, Where Art Thou?". Outlook India. Retrieved 22 October 2019.
  22. "A warning from history by MGS Narayanan : UP Front - India Today". indiatoday.intoday.in. Archived from the original on 10 August 2014. Retrieved 29 November 2015.
  23. Guha, Ramachandra. "Where are India's conservative intellectuals?". The Caravan. Retrieved 23 October 2019.
  24. RAJALAKSHMI, T. K. "A quiet invasion". Frontline. Retrieved 23 October 2019.
  25. Chopra, Ritika (26 June 2015). "Professor Gopinath Ravindran had free hand, but he lacked basic decency: Y Sudershan Rao". The Economic Times. Retrieved 23 October 2019.
  26. Sreedathan, G. (3 October 2015). "Vedic studies are not a recent phenomenon: Yellapragada Sudershan Rao". Business Standard India. Retrieved 23 October 2019.
  27. "Interview given to Sobhana K Nair, Mumbai Mirror on 30th of December 2015". Retrieved 23 October 2019.
  28. "We Should Train Barefoot Historians". The New Indian Express. Retrieved 23 October 2019.
  29. "ICHR member secretary resigns". The Hindu. PTI. 19 June 2015. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 23 October 2019.CS1 maint: others (link)
  30. Chopra, Ritika (24 June 2015). "I wouldn't have 80% of current ICHR members, says dissenter Gopinath Ravindran". The Economic Times. Retrieved 23 October 2019.
  31. Chopra, Ritika (14 January 2015). "ICHR chief Sudershan Rao recommends 3 RSS historians to top panel". The Economic Times. Retrieved 23 October 2019.
  32. "No Ram Setu study: ICHR". www.telegraphindia.com. Retrieved 23 October 2019.
  33. Parthasarathy, Venkatesan (11 January 2015). "Let us not reject ancient knowledge, says professor". Deccan Chronicle.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.