Yōrō Code

Premodern Japan
	Part of a series on the politics and; government of Japan during the; Nara and Heian periods
Daijō-kan; (Council of State)
Chancellor / Chief Minister	Daijō-daijin
Minister of the Left	Sadaijin
Minister of the Right	Udaijin
Minister of the Center	Naidaijin
Major Counselor	Dainagon
Middle Counselor	Chūnagon
Minor Counselor	Shōnagon
Eight Ministries
Center	Nakatsukasa-shō
Ceremonial	Shikibu-shō
Civil Administration	Jibu-shō
Popular Affairs	Minbu-shō
War	Hyōbu-shō
Justice	Gyōbu-shō
Treasury	Ōkura-shō
Imperial Household	Kunai-shō

The Yōrō Code (養老律令, Yōrō-ritsuryō) was one iteration of several codes or governing rules compiled in early Nara period in Classical Japan. It was compiled in 718, the second year of the Yōrō regnal era by Fujiwara no Fuhito et al., but not promulgated until 757 under the regime of Fujiwara no Nakamaro under Empress Kōken.[1][2]

The penal code portions (ritsu) were largely lost, although they have been reconstructed. The content of the civil code portions (ryō) are preserved nearly fully, copied out in later texts.[1][2]

Overview

The Yōrō Code was a revision of the Taihō Code of 701,[3] and differences may have been limited.[4] Still, when Nakamaro put the laws into effect in 757, it was unpopular among the nobility as it "slowed down the promotion schedule for officials."[5]

State of preservation

While the precursor code (Taihō Code) does not survive, a substantial amount of Yōrō Code is preserved in the exegitical piece, Ryō no gige (『令義解』) (833), especially the civil codes. In English-language scholarly literature, some commentators merely state that the code is preserved in a fragmentary state,[6] but other academics do note preservation is nearly complete for the civil code portion.[7] The Ryō no gige contains the full text of the ryō (or civil/administrative code part) except for two chapters according to a Kadokawa publishing house history dictionary,[lower-alpha 1] the missing portions being the warehouse statute (倉庫令, sōko-ryō) and the medical service statute (医疾令, ishitsu-ryō), and even this lacuna can be partly be filled from a collections of fragments of the codes.[2]

The ritsu or the penal code portion was largely lost, but a compilation of fragments from various codes, entitled the Ritsuitsu (『律逸』), in 8 volumes, was compiled by Ishihara Masaaki (石原正明) 1760–1821. The resulting text, including the fragments, are printed in the volume on Ritsuryō texts in the Kokushi taikei (『国史大系』) historical text series.[2][8] Other sources agree, adding that for the civil code, almost all of the text that runs to Article 955 has been restored.[9][10]

Relying on the Tang dynasty penal code that survives, a complete reconstruction of the Yōrō penal code has also been undertaken.[11]

Tang dynasty model

The ritsuryō codes were modeled after the civil and penal codes of the Tang dynasty, in particular, the code of the Chinese: Yonghui era passed in 651 which was then current is named by scholars as the basis of the two ritsuryō codes.[1][12]

Period in force

The Code remained in effect until the early 10th century,[1] after which it became an obsolete dead letter law code, but not formally repealed and hence valid at least "in paper" until the Meiji Restoration.[2][11] During the feudal age in Japan, various ministerial offices were awarded to as formality to samurai (e.g., Ishida Mitsunari as jibu-no-shō; Furuta Oribe, Ii kamon-no-kami, Sakai uta-no-kami etc.) without any responsibilities or authorities vested in the office under the code.

gollark: I feel like I was very clear that no.

gollark: Secondly, no.

gollark: Firstly, you need quotes around "a jiffy".

gollark: ++remind 10000000s This is 10Ms.

gollark: ++remind 1000000s This is 1Ms.

Explanatory notes

out of 30 chapters, 10 fascicules

Citations

"Ritsuryō system" (snippet), Kodansha encyclopedia of Japan, Kōdansha, 6, p. 331, 1983
高柳, 光寿 (Takayanagi, Mitsuhisa); 竹内, 理三 (Rizō, Takeuchi), eds. (1974) [1966], 角川日本史辞典 (2 ed.), 角川書店, p. 976, ISBN 4040305027
Sansom 1932, p. 69
"The major difference between the Taihō and Yōrō administrative codes seems to be limited to an introduction in the latter of a more precise terminology for about two hundred terms." (online summary) to Ooms 2013
Piggott, Joan R. (1987), "Chapter II: Politics in the Age of Shōmu", Tōdaiji and the Nara imperium (snippet), Stanford University, pp. 65–66
Ooms 2013
Smith, Robert J. (2004) [1963], "Stability in Japanese kinship terminology: the historical evidence", Japanese Culture: Its Development and Characteristics, Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology, Routledge, 34
Vol. 22 of the new expanded edition of Kokushi taikei (Kuroita 1966)
朝尾, 直弘 (Asao, Naohiro) (1976), 岩波講座日本歴史 (Iwanami kōza Nihon rekishi ) (snippet), 3, Naoki Kōjirō, 岩波書店, p. 3
青木, 和夫 (Kazuo, Aoki) (1992). 日本律令国家論攷 (snippet). p. 245. ISBN 400001692X.
Steenstrup, Carl, A History of Law in Japan Until 1868, p. 35, crediting Niida Noboru and Shiga Shūzō for the reconstruction from the T'ang.
Farris, William Wayne (1998). "Trade, Money, and Merchants in Nara Japan" (snippet). Monumenta Nipponica. Sophia University: 319.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)

External links

Yoro Civil Code (養老令) (.Lzh compressed file) by Yoshiki Koizuka (恋塚嘉) and Katsuya Miyoshi (三好克也), available at the Open Database page, admin Takehiko Yoshimura (吉村武彦), Meiji University Research Institute for Japanese Ancient Studies site.

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.

[8] ut of 30 chapters, 10 fascicules

[kodansha-1] "Ritsuryō system" (snippet), Kodansha encyclopedia of Japan, Kōdansha, 6, p. 331, 1983

[kadokawa-nihonshijiten-2] 高柳, 光寿 (Takayanagi, Mitsuhisa); 竹内, 理三 (Rizō, Takeuchi), eds. (1974) [1966], 角川日本史辞典 (2 ed.), 角川書店, p. 976, ISBN 4040305027

[3] Sansom 1932, p. 69

[4] "The major difference between the Taihō and Yōrō administrative codes seems to be limited to an introduction in the latter of a more precise terminology for about two hundred terms." (online summary) to Ooms 2013

[5] Piggott, Joan R. (1987), "Chapter II: Politics in the Age of Shōmu", Tōdaiji and the Nara imperium (snippet), Stanford University, pp. 65–66

[6] Ooms 2013

[7] Smith, Robert J. (2004) [1963], "Stability in Japanese kinship terminology: the historical evidence", Japanese Culture: Its Development and Characteristics, Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology, Routledge, 34

[9] Vol. 22 of the new expanded edition of Kokushi taikei (Kuroita 1966)

[10] 朝尾, 直弘 (Asao, Naohiro) (1976), 岩波講座日本歴史 (Iwanami kōza Nihon rekishi ) (snippet), 3, Naoki Kōjirō, 岩波書店, p. 3

[11] 青木, 和夫 (Kazuo, Aoki) (1992). 日本律令国家論攷 (snippet). p. 245. ISBN 400001692X.

[steenstrup-12] Steenstrup, Carl, A History of Law in Japan Until 1868, p. 35, crediting Niida Noboru and Shiga Shūzō for the reconstruction from the T'ang.

[13] Farris, William Wayne (1998). "Trade, Money, and Merchants in Nara Japan" (snippet). Monumenta Nipponica. Sophia University: 319.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)