XVI Venice Challenge Save Cup – Doubles
Ken and Neal Skupski were the defending champions but chose not to defend their title.
Doubles | |
---|---|
XVI Venice Challenge Save Cup | |
Champions | |
Runners-up | |
Final score | 6–4, 6–7(2–7), [10–2] |
Marin and Tomislav Draganja won the title after defeating Romain Arneodo and Danilo Petrović 6–4, 6–7(2–7), [10–2] in the final.
Seeds
Sander Gillé / Joran Vliegen (Quarterfinals, retired) Miguel Ángel Reyes-Varela / Fernando Romboli (Semifinals) Sergio Galdós / Fabrício Neis (First round) Marin Draganja / Tomislav Draganja (Champions)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
First Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 7 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 | 4 | 1 | 62 | 0r | |||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | 6 | 4 | [10] | WC | 77 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 6 | [7] | WC | 3 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | 4 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 4 | [17] | |||||||||||||||||||||
WC | 64 | 6 | [6] | 4 | 6 | [15] | |||||||||||||||||||||
77 | 3 | [10] | 4 | 6 | 62 | [10] | |||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 5 | [10] | 4 | 77 | [2] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 7 | [7] | 6 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 6 | 3 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 1 | [10] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Alt | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 6 | [3] | |||||||||||||||||||||
Alt | 6 | 6 | Alt | 2 | 7 | [7] | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 5 | [10] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 6 | 6 |
gollark: So come up with better scoring criteria, don't just bias the whole system.
gollark: Also, essays are the enemy of mankind and must be destroyed.
gollark: I agree, extracurricular stuff is a weird thing to base admission stuff on and probably not all that relevant.
gollark: Standardized test things aren't really ideal in terms of judging how good you actually would be about a subject, but if you actually can measure merit well it seems a way better thing to base admission stuff on than the alternatives. It is kind of a big "if", though.
gollark: I mean, it is still discrimination, it's not *reducing* it.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.