XHFN-TDT

XHFN-TDT is a television station in Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico. The station carries the Azteca 7 network and also serves as the key station of the Azteca Noreste regional network, serving the northeastern states of Mexico with regional news and programming.[2][3]

XHFN-TDT
Monterrey, Nuevo Leon
ChannelsDigital: 17 (UHF)
Virtual: 7 (PSIP)
BrandingAzteca 7
Programming
AffiliationsAzteca 7
Ownership
OwnerTV Azteca
(Televisión Azteca, S.A. de C.V.)
Sister stationsXHWX-TDT
History
FoundedFebruary 1974
Former call signsXHFN-TV (1974-2015)
Former channel number(s)Analog:
8 (VHF, 1974-1994)
7 (VHF, 1994-2015)
Technical information
ERP342.070 kW[1]
Transmitter coordinates25°37′29.30″N 100°19′13.40″W
Links
WebsiteTV Azteca Noreste

History

XHFN signed on in February 1974[4] on channel 8, under the auspices of CEMPAE (Centro para el Estudio de Medios y Procedimientos Avanzados de la Educación, or "Center for the Study of Advanced Media and Education Processes"). It primarily broadcast educational programs and telecourses.

CEMPAE was shuttered on January 20, 1983, with the Secretariat of Public Education absorbing its assets.[5] Two months later, upon the creation of the Instituto Mexicano de la Televisión (abbreviated Imevisión), XHFN became part of the new federal agency. As an Imevisión station, XHFN broadcast programs from its two networks as well as local Monterrey productions, including local news. In 1992, XHFN was part of the media package that became Televisión Azteca. Also in the 1990s, it moved from channel 8 to channel 7.

Digital television

ChannelVideoRatioCallsignNetworkProgramming
7.11080i16:9XHFNAzteca 7-HDMain XHFN-TDT Programming
7.2480iA+ NoresteAlternative and TV Azteca's rerun Programming

Repeaters

XHWX-TDT is repeated on eight transmitters in Nuevo León:

RF Location ERP
17 China .100 kW[6]
17 Escobedo .028 kW
17 Galeana .081 kW[7]
17 García .120 kW
11 Guadalupe 9.292 kW
17 Linares .100 kW[8]
17 Montemorelos .101 kW
17 Sabinas Hidalgo 8.588 kW
gollark: The slope of the line.
gollark: Ah, so if two adjacent things are the same and both extrema it wants the midpoint?
gollark: If they mean approximately the same things as in the calculus I did, then if the gradient was positive/negative on one side and the same sign on the other it would not be a maximum/minimum but just an inflection point. But if the gradient changes sign, then it can be, and this probably requires a different value to on either side. But I don't really get what they're saying either.
gollark: I think to be a valid maximum/minimum it has to be >/< but *not* equal?
gollark: This is quite complicated. I may need a while.

References


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.