Water pollution in Canterbury, New Zealand

Water pollution in Canterbury in New Zealand has become a notable environmental issue due in a large part to the burgeoning dairy industry.

The Canterbury Region is in the South Island of New Zealand.

Water resources are under the jurisdiction of the Canterbury Regional Council (Ecan) under the Resource Management Act (RMA), and water abstraction and use for irrigation requires a resource consent.

The municipal water supply for Christchurch, sourced from the aquifers beneath the city, is untreated. This is unusual for a city of its size.

Background

Due to the rain shadow effect of the Southern Alps the rainfall in Canterbury is lower than many other parts of the country at 500–700 mm per year.[1] Water from melting snow and ice and from rainfall drain into the predominantly braided rivers on the Canterbury Plains. The rivers recharge the aquifers beneath the plains.

The Canterbury Region was traditionally arable and livestock farming but there have been a large number of dairy conversions in the region. In recent years there has been a huge expansion in dairy farming throughout the South Island.[2] Dairy farming requires the intensive use of water and it is placing a high demand on water resources in the Canterbury Region.

Issues
A water pollution sign on the Waimakariri River in 2004.

The rivers and groundwater are being polluted with nitrates and E. coli. Nitrate concentrations in the groundwater are above the drinking water standards in around 7% of monitored wells according to 2017 data from Environment Canterbury. According to Environment Canterbury's 2 017 progress report on the Canterbury Water Management Strategy, 71% of the 224 wells sampled in 2015 showed no increasing or decreasing nitrate trend, 25% of wells showed an increase nitrate trend and 4% showed a decreasing nitrate trend.

According to the Ministry for the Environment, 77% of Canterbury rivers and lakes are graded excellent or good for swimming and 4% are graded as poor.

Inorganic nutrients, an indication of water quality, are considered to be low but increase closer to the coast. For 2000-2001 28% of tested sites were classed as "alert" due to the presence of organic pollutants.[3]

Water pollution of the two rivers flowing through the city of Christchurch, the Avon and the Heathcote, is of concern. Untreated sewage can flow into the rivers during times of high rainfall. The estuary where the two rivers discharge had received treated water from the sewerage treatment plant that processed the city's sewage. However, a pipeline was constructed to discharge the water into Pegasus Bay. It became operational in 2010.[4]

The Central Plains Water scheme is a large-scale proposal for water diversion, damming, reticulation and irrigation over an area of 60,000 ha.

A large number of resource consent applications for intensive dairy farming in the Mackenzie Basin attracted opposition due in part to the potential effects on water quality.[5] The resource consents were called in under the RMA by the Minister for the Environment Nick Smith.[6]

Cheviot has been on a boil water notice since October 2004.[7]

Mitigation

The Dairying and Clean Streams Accord was set up by Fonterra and a number of government agencies as a means of reducing nonpoint source pollution. The Accord is criticised for not achieving its goals.[8]

In recent years, Environment Canterbury has introduced stricter environmental requirements for farms with most farms now required to have Farm Environment Plans as well as many farms having nutrient discharge limits on nitrogen losses. Farm Environment Plans require farms to plan and demonstrate they are actively managing environmental practices such as nutrient application, erosion risk, irrigation, dairy effluent and waterway protection (through fencing off waterways in intensively stocked areas and riparian planting).

Recent assessments of water quality in Canterbury have indicated that the introduction of these new requirements is helping to improve water quality. Nitrogen, phosphorus, sediment and e.coli are all now improving at more monitored sites than are worsening. Turbidity is the only measure which showed more sites worsening.

Prosecutions

In recent years prosecutions have been made for causing water pollution:

  • 2009 - Philip Curry was fined $5,000 after pleading guilty to discharging effluent onto land that may have resulted in contaminants entering nearby Barry's Bay Stream.[9]
  • 2009 - Corlette Holdings was fined $10,000 after pleading guilty to two charges of discharging effluent from an irrigator resulted in ponding and a second charge of effluent being discharged, which may have resulted in contaminated water.[10]
  • 2010 - A prosecution against Brook Farms and Mosbro Farms in Ashburton was withdrawn after they agreed to mitigate the effects of the effluent discharge.[11]
  • In 2012, Springston dairy farm company, White Gold Ltd, was fined a record $90,000 after illegally discharging 45,000 litres of diluted dairy effluent over a three-day period in 2010. The public reported the dairy effluent flowing into waterways that flowed into Lake Ellesmere.[12]
gollark: > sure resource distribution is nontrivial but its not that hardWhat do you propose to do for it?
gollark: Hack into Twitter again and make Trump tweet about the asymmetrical emoji.
gollark: Mail slightly asymmetrical foxes to the twemoji people in real life.
gollark: Highlight all the asymmetry.
gollark: https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/411573884597436416/778392005357076519/unknown.png?width=421&height=422

See also

References
  1. State of the Climate 2010: A snapshot of recent climate in New Zealand (PDF), NIWA Science & Technology Series No. 56, NIWA, 2010, ISSN 1173-0382
  2. "Agricultural Production Statistics". Statistics New Zealand. June 2009. Retrieved 6 August 2010.
  3. PCE (October 2004). Growing for good: Intensive farming, sustainability and New Zealand's environment. Wellington: Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment. p. 46. ISBN 1-877274-51-8. Retrieved 6 August 2010.
  4. "Ocean Outfall opens". Christchurch City Council. 24 March 2010. Retrieved 6 August 2010.
  5. Williams, David (30 May 2009). "MacKenzies Basin 'water grab' opposed". The Press. Retrieved 5 June 2009.
  6. "Minister calls in Mackenzie Basin dairy discharge consents". Beehive. 27 January 2010. Retrieved 6 August 2010.
  7. "Community and Public Health - Summary Report to CPH&DSAC" (PDF). Canterbury District Health Board. 2009. Retrieved 28 September 2010.
  9. "Banks Peninsula dairy farmer fined for effluent discharge". Ecan. 17 April 2009. Retrieved 6 August 2010.
  10. "Canterbury dairy farm fined for effluent discharge". Ecan. 17 March 2009. Retrieved 6 August 2010.
  11. "Prosecution withdrawn for dairy shed effluent discharge". Ecan. 31 March 2010. Retrieved 6 August 2010.
  12. Young, Rachael (20 July 2012). "Record fine for Springston dairy farm". The Press. Retrieved 4 August 2012.

Further reading
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.