Vladimir Rusalov

Vladimir Mikhaylovich Rusalov (born 5 October 1939) - Russian psychologist and anthropologist who was first to develop a temperament model within the Activity-specific approach. He is best known for his work in psychology of personality, temperament [1][2][3][4] and differential psychophysiology[5][6].

Vladimir Rusalov
Vladimir Rusalov 2007
Born
Vladimir Mikhaylovich Rusalov

(1939-10-05)5 October 1939
Kislyar, Dagestan, Russia
CitizenshipRussian
Alma materLomonosov Moscow State University
Known forStructure of Temperament Questionnaire
Scientific career
Fieldspsychology, psychophysiology, temperament, individual differences, psychometrics
InstitutionsInstitute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Doctoral advisorsAlexander Luria, Vladimir Nebylitsyn

Biography

Rusalov was born in Kizlyar (Dagestan, Russia). In 1963 he graduated from the Department of Biology (specialty of Anthropology) Lomonosov Moscow State University. In 1963-1972 he was working as a junior and then senior researcher in Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Pedagogical Sciences under the supervision of Boris Teplov and Vladimir Nebylitsyn. His background in anthropology and interest in individual differences attracted attention of neuropsychologist Alexander Luria who became Rusalov's Ph.D. supervisor. The title of his Ph.D. was “Human constitution and absolute thresholds within the nervous system”, a degree was received in 1967 from this Institute of Psychology. During his Ph.D. program he met and collaborated with Jan Strelau, who was also a Ph.D. student in Vladimir Nebylitsyn laboratory at that time.

From 1972 to the present time he works as a scientist in the Institute of Psychology under Russian Academy of Sciences. In 1972-2004 he was a Head of the Laboratory of Differential Psychophysiology (renamed later as Nebylitsyn laboratory of individuality). In 1982 he received his a full Doctorate degree for his work “Biological basis of psychological individual differences”. This work included a comparison of the EEG recordings and performance on various tasks of individuals with different endurance, tempo, plasticity and emotionality [5][7][8][9][10]. In 2004-2009 he was working as a Leading Researcher in Nebylitsyn’s Laboratory of Individuality. From 2009 to present he works as a Leading Researcher in Drujinin Laboratory of Abilities and Mental Resources, Institute of Psychology under Russian Academy of Sciences [11]. He also carries a status of Professor teaching psychology in Moscow universities and colleges since 1992. He was also an invited professor in several American Universities.

Scientific contribution: first activity-specific model of temperament

Rusalov works in the field of psychophysiology, psycho diagnostics, personality psychology and differential psychology for over 40 years. His Ph.D. program was based on Luria's interest in neurophysiological bases of individual differences and on the experimental approach of Teplov and Vladimir Nebylitsyn who continued Pavlov’s studies of the typology of nervous systems [12][13].

In his own studies Rusalov recorded EEGs and measured evoked potentials, absolute thresholds in visual, auditory, and tactile modalities, strength of excitation in auditory and visual modalities, mobility in auditory and visual modalities, problem-solving in deterministic and probabilistic conditions, the speed of problem solving using a variety of tests on intelligence, time spent attempting unsolvable problems and the number of times that a subject gave up while attempting to solve a task [5][8][9][10].

From these experiments Rusalov concluded that temperamental traits are activity-specific: the energetic level or tempo of performance might be different for the same individual in physical, social or intellectual activities, therefore, the aspects of the performance of these activities should be assessed and analyzed separately. Rusalov suggested that temperament traits be assessed using four scales: [14][2][4][6]

  • (1) ergonicity (endurance, ability for prolonged work),
  • (2) plasticity,
  • (3) tempo of activity, and
  • (4) emotionality,

each evaluated separately in three areas of activity: social, physical and intellectual [15]. Mental (intellectual) activities are considered to be those which involve the greatest degree of probabilistic behavior and which require conscious attention [16][17][18]. This 4 (traits) x 3 (types of activities) model of temperament was the first model within the activity-specific approach[19][20].

Based on this model, Rusalov developed the Structure of Temperament Questionnaire (STQ)[2][3][4][6][14][21][22]. The first version of the English version of the STQ came out in 1989 [14] and had in total 8 scales: four scales Ergonicity (endurance, the ability to keep intensive work), Plasticity (or flexibility, the ability to effectively switch between tasks or to change the way of performance), Tempo, and Emotionality assessed in two types of aspects of activity, physical-motor (Motor) and social-verbal (such as reading, writing, speaking, communication). Then an Extended version of the STQ was offered (1997) that included a third set of four scales to measure aspects of intellectual activity[2][4]. His initial and extended versions of Structure of Temperament Questionnaire[14][2][3] became the most widely used in Russian Psychology [4][23][24][25][26] in the practice of personnel selection, personality studies, educational psychology and clinical psychology in the past 20 years.

The benefits and novelty of the activity-specific approach developed by Rusalov were that it offered a differentiation between traits that was missed in previous models of temperament and personality. This approach, i.e. differentiation between physical, verbal and mental aspects of activities was used in the neurochemical model of Functional Ensemble of Temperament developed in 2007-2014 [20][27]. Another benefits and novelty of the activity-specific approach was that it integrated the principle of habit formation in behavioural regulation into the structure of psychological individual differences [28]. Other models of personality and temperament did not differentiate between traits related to probabilistic and deterministic aspects of behavioural regulation. Meanwhile, it is well-known in neuroscience that behaviour in complex, probabilistic and novel situations is regulated by different (neocortex) systems than behaviour in learned or simple situations (regulated more by basal ganglia). Rusalov demonstrated that this distinction is applicable to the structure of temperament. For example, when it comes to Endurance, Intellectual Endurance relates to capacities for prolonged mental activities whereas Physical (Motor) Endurance in his model relates to capacities for stereotypical, well-learned physical work. Similarly, the trait of Plasticity in Rusalov's model relates to activation of the frontal cortex controlling the ease of integration of new programs of actions whereas the trait of Tempo relates to the speed of integration of previously learned or simple actions.

Neurophysiological (cortical) systems regulating probabilistic aspects of actions gradually pass control to the "habit" systems (in basal ganglia when an individual learns the action or already has sufficient familiarity with the program of actions.

Traits identified by the STQ were found to have strong genetic component [29][30][31][32][33]. Specific temperament profile as measured by Rusalov's model was also linked to creativity [34] and psychiatric disorders [35][36].

gollark: I don't think so, there might be `.insert`.
gollark: Yes.
gollark: Ah, it is due for Monday.
gollark: Good, good.
gollark: Wait, is that due soon?

References
  1. Rusalov VM (1985). "On nature of temperament and its place in structure of human individual differences [О природе темперамента и его месте в структуре индивидуальных свойств человека]". Questions of Psychology [Voprosi Psychologii]. 1: 19–32.
  2. Rusalov, VM (1997). Oprosnik formal'no-dynamicheskih svoystv individual'nosti. [Questionnaire of formal-dynamical properties of individual. Manual. Moscow: IPRAN.
  3. Rusalov, VM (2004). Formal'no-dynamicheskiye svoystva individual'nosti (temperament) [Formal-dynamical properties of individual (temperament)]. Russian Academy of Sciences, IPAN Press: Moscow.
  4. Rusalov, VM; Trofimova, IN (2007). Structure of Temperament and Its Measurement. Toronto, Canada: Psychological Services Press.
  5. Rusalov VM (1979). Biologicheskiye osnovi individual'no-psichologicheskih razlichiy [Biological basis of individual psychological differences] Moscow: Nauka Russia.
  6. Rusalov VM (2012). Temperament within the structure of human individuality: studies in differential psychophysiology and psychology [Темперамент в структуре индивидуальности человека: дифференциально-психофизиологические и психологические исследования]. Moscow: Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences.
  7. Rusalov VM (1988). Psychological individual differences and bio-electric activity of the brain (Ed.) [Индивидуально-психологические различия и биоэлектрическая активность мозга]. Moscow: Nauka.
  8. Rusalov, VM; Kalashnikov, SV. (1988). "On the correlation of psychic plasticity with the integral factors of human brain bioelectrical activity". Rusalov, V. M. (Ed.) Individual'no -psikhologicheskie Razlichiya I Bioelektricheskaya Aktivnost' Mozga Cheloveka [Individual Psychological Differences and Human Brain Bioelectrical Activity]Moscow: Nauka. 1: 5–55.
  9. Rusalov VM, Kalashnikova IG (1992). "Psychological testing of temperament". Journal of Higher Nervous Activity[Zhurnal Vysshey Nervnoy Deyatelnosti]. 42 (1): 44.
  10. Rusalov VM, Rusalova MN, Kalashnikova IG, Stepanov VG, Strelnikova, TN (1993). "Bioelectrical activity of the brain in subjects with different types of temperament". Journal of Higher Nervous Activity[Zhurnal Vysshey Nervnoy Deyatelnosti]. 43 (3): 530–542.
  11. "The structure of temperament and its measurement : The theory and the manual of the Structure of Temperament Questionnaire (STQ) /".
  12. Teplov, B.M.; Nebylitsyn, VD (1963). "Experimental study of properties of the nervous system in man". Journal of Highest Nervous Activity. 13: 789–797.
  13. {{cite book|author=Nebylitsyn, V.D.|year=1972|title=Fundamental properties of the human nervous system. NY: Plenum
  14. Rusalov, VM (1989). "Motor and communicative aspects of human temperament: a new questionnaire of the structure of temperament". Personality and Individual Differences. 10: 817–827. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(89)90017-2.
  15. Rusalov VM, Rusalova MN, Strelnikova EV (2000). "Temperament cheloveka i osobennosti vibora mejdu veroyatnostyu dostijeniya tseli i ee tzennostyu [Temperament of man and peculiarities of choice between the probability of goal achievement and its value]". Zhurnal Vysshey Nervnoy Deyatelnosti [Journal of Higher Nervous Activity]. 50 (3): 388.
  16. Rusalov, V.M.; Parilis, S.E. (1991). "Temperament and particularities of cognitive system of personality". Psychological Journal [Psichologicheskii Zjurnal]. 12 (1): 118–123.
  17. Rusalov, VM; Naumova, ER (1999). "On the relationship between general abilities and "intellectual" scales of temperament". Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal [Psychological Journal]. 20 (1): 70–77.
  18. Rusalov, VM; Dudin, SI (1995). "Temperament i intellect: obchie b specificheskiye factori rasvitiya [Temperament and Intelligence: general and specific factors of development]". Psikhologicheskiy Zhurnal [Psychological Journal]. 16 (5): 12–23.
  19. Rusalov VM (2005). "Interaction of temperament and character in the structure of individuality [Взаимосвязь характера и темперамента в структуре индивидуальности]". Psychological Journal [Psichologicheskii Zjurnal]. 3: 65–73.
  20. Rusalov, Vladimir (2018). "Functional systems theory and the activity-specific approach in psychological taxonomies". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 373 (1744): 20170166. doi:10.1098/rstb.2017.0166. PMC 5832690. PMID 29483350.
  21. Rusalov VM (1986). "Theoretical problems of construction of special theory of human individuality [Теоретические проблемы построения специальной теории индивидуальности человека]". Psychological Journal [Psichologicheskii Zjurnal]. 4: 23–35.
  22. Rusalov VM (1989). "Natural precursors of individual behaviour as factors of human individuality [Природные предпосылки индивидуального поведения как фактор становления индивидуальности человека]". Journal of Higher Nervous Activity. 3: 403–424.
  23. Бурлачук Л.Ф. (2006) Психодиагностика. Санкт-Петербург: Питер.
  24. Карелин А. (2007) Большая энциклопедия психологических тестов. Издательство: Москва, Эксмо.
  25. Посохова, С.Т. Соловьева, С.Л. (2008) Настольная книга практического психолога. - Москва: АСТ; Санкт-Петербург: Сова
  26. Романова Е.С. (2005) Психодиагностика: Учебное пособие. Санкт-Петербург: Питер.
  27. Rusalov VM, Trofimova IN (2011). "O predstavlennosti tipov psichicheskoy deatelnosti v raslichnih modelyah temperamenta [On representation of psychological types in several models of temperament]". Psychological Journal [Psichologicheskii Zjurnal]. 32 (3): 74–84.
  28. Uher J, Trofimova I, Sulis W, Netter P, Pessoa L, Posner M, Rothbart M, Rusalov V, Petersen I, Schmidt L (2018). "Diversity in action: Exchange of perspectives and reflections on taxonomies of individual differences". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 373 (1744): 20170172. doi:10.1098/rstb.2017.0172. PMC 5832695. PMID 29483355.
  29. Biryukov SD (1992). "Psychogenetic study of plasticity as a temperamental trait". Psychological Journal (Psikhologicheskii Zjurnal). 13 (5): 64–71.
  30. Kornienko DS (2006). "Characteristics of integral individuality from the perspective of psychogenetic approach". Psychology of Individuality. High Economic School/Series Psychology. Moscow.
  31. Vorobieva, EV (2004). "Modern psychogenetic studies of intelligence and theory of motivation for achievements". Journal of Applied Psychology. 3: 53–59.
  32. Rusalov VM, Galimov RA (2002). "On heredity of formal-dynamical properties of individuality". Proceedings of the Second International Luria Memorial Conference. Moscow.
  33. Vorobyeva, E.V.; et al. (2015). "The relationships between the achievement motivations and temperaments of psychology students with different lateral organization profiles". Psychology in Russia: State of the Art. 8: 32. doi:10.11621/pir.2015.0104.
  34. Rusalov, V.M.; Poltavtzeva, L. I. (1997). "Temperament as a prerequisite of creative abilities". Pavlov Journal of Higher Nervous Activity. 47 (3): 451–460.
  35. Trofimova, IN; Sulis, W (2018). "There is more to mental illness than negative affect: comprehensive temperament profiles in depression and generalized anxiety". BMC Psychiatry. 18:125 (1): 125. doi:10.1186/s12888-018-1695-x. PMC 5946468. PMID 29747614.
  36. Sulis, W. (2018). "Assessing the continuum between temperament and affective illness: Psychiatric and mathematical perspectives". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 373 (1744): 20170168. doi:10.1098/rstb.2017.0168. PMC 5832692. PMID 29483352.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.