Van (album)
Van. is the fourth solo album and second original studio album from Japanese singer Tomiko Van. It was released on December 10, 2008 and contains the title tracks of all four of her solo singles, as well as two b-sides and five new tracks, for an overall total of eleven tracks.[1]
| Van. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | ||||
| Studio album by | ||||
| Released | December 10, 2008 | |||
| Recorded | 2006-2008 | |||
| Genre | J-pop | |||
| Label | Avex Trax | |||
| Tomiko Van chronology | ||||
| ||||
| CD + DVD | ||||
 | ||||
Track listing
CD
- Catalog number: AVCD-23712
- Flower
- Utopia
- manacles
- Brave
- Yumeji (夢路; Dream Road)
- carry out
- Senkou (閃光; Glint)
- message.
- Tokyo Biyori (東京日和; Tokyo Weather)
- Refrain
- Van. (Instrumental Track)
DVD
- Flower
- Senkou
- Yumeji
- Tokyo Biyori
- Flower (a-nation)
Charts
| Chart | Peak position |
Sales | Time in chart |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oricon Weekly Albums | #28[2] | 8,852 | 4 weeks |
gollark: It's osmarkspythonbuildsystem™, actually.
gollark: Maybe you should rewrite it in Rust.
gollark: Thusly, git.osmarks.net is C.
gollark: > Allows visitors to look and download without authenticating. (A+0)Yes.> Does not log anything about visitors. (A+1)No. Your IP and user agent are logged for purposes.> Follows the criteria in The Electronic Frontier Foundation's best practices for online service providers. (A+2)> Follows the Web “Content” Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (WCAG 2.0) standard. (A+3)> Follows the Web Accessibility Initiative — Accessible Rich Internet Applications 1.0 (WAI-ARIA 1.0) standard. (A+4)Probably not.> All data contributed by the project owner and contributors is exportable in a machine-readable format. (A+5)No idea. There might be an API.
gollark: > All important site functions work correctly (though may not look as nice) when the user disables execution of JavaScript and other code sent by the site. (A0)I think they *mostly* do.> Server code released as free software. (A1)Yes.> Encourages use of GPL 3-or-later as preferred option. (A2)> Offers use of AGPL 3-or-later as an option. (A3)> Does not permit nonfree licenses (or lack of license) for works for practical use. (A4)See above. Although not ALLOWING licenses like that would be very not free.> Does not recommend services that are SaaSS. (A5)Yes.> Says “free software,” not “open source.” (A6)Don't know if it says either.> Clearly endorses the Free Software Movement's ideas of freedom. (A7)No.> Avoids saying “Linux” without “GNU” when referring to GNU/Linux. (A8)It says neither.> Insists that each nontrivial file in a package clearly and unambiguously state how it is licensed. (A9)No, and this is stupid.
References
External links
- mu-mo page (in Japanese)
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.