United States Court of Private Land Claims

The United States Court of Private Land Claims (1891–1904), was a United States court created to decide land claims guaranteed by the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, in the territories of New Mexico, Arizona, and Utah, and in the states of Nevada, Colorado, and Wyoming.

Justices for the United States Court of Private Land Claims (1891-1904). Pictured (l-r) Thomas C. Fuller, Wilbur F. Stone, Chief Justice Joseph R. Reed, Henry C. Sluss, and William W. Murray

Origins
Map of the San Miguel del Bado Grant in central New Mexico, from the United States Court of Private Land Claims, Julian Sandoval Case 25 (1894–1902).

During Spanish (1598–1821) and Mexican (1821–1846) rule over what was to become the U.S. Southwest, the governments made land grants to various individuals and communities. Under the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo (1848), which ended the Mexican–American War, the United States obtained these territories, and in Article VIII guaranteed the rights of Mexican and former Mexican citizens to their property.[1][2] However, the U.S. Senate in ratifying the treaty eliminated Article 10, which stated that the U.S. government would honor and guarantee all land grants awarded in lands ceded to the United States to citizens of Spain and Mexico by those respective governments. Thus land grants were subject to being proved.[2]

In 1851, Congress passed the first legislation implementing the property protection provisions of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, however it addressed only the Spanish and Mexican grants in California.[3] Congress focused on California's land grants first because California was already a populous state, and it wanted to encourage further settlement of the public domain land there.

In 1854 the U.S. Congress established the office of the Surveyor General of New Mexico to ascertain "the origin, nature, character, and extent to all claims to lands under the laws, usages, and customs of Spain and Mexico." At first the Congress tried to deal with each land grant by special bill and the House had a Committee on Private Land Claims, seats on which were sought after as a way of dispensing patronage. By 1880 the corruption[4] inherent in determining these claims by politics rather than on a legal basis forced an end to this practice.[5] For ten years no claims could be proved as against the United States.

So the U.S. Congress, in 1891, created the Court of Private Land Claims consisting of five justices appointed for a term to expire on December 31, 1895. The court itself was to exist only during this period, although its existence and the terms of the justices were from time to time extended until June 30, 1904. This court was given jurisdiction over claims to land in the territories of New Mexico, Arizona, and Utah, and in the states of Nevada, Colorado, and Wyoming, which had not been previously proved and affirmed by the United States. Many of these Spanish or Mexican land grants were based upon incomplete documentation, in part because those governments did not issue deeds to the grantees, and records were kept variously at the territorial, state, vice-royal or imperial level.

Work of the Court

The court heard over three hundred cases involving over thirty-six million acres (150,000 km2) of land. Only eighty-seven land grants were confirmed, for a total of three million acres (12,000 km2), or less than 10%. Many confirmed grants were reduced in size from that claimed. For example, the Cañon de Chama Grant was reduced from 200,000 to 1,500 acres (800 to 6 km2).[6]

Among the many problems facing the court were the old Spanish system of metes and bounds. Century or two old landmarks were hard to find. The length of a vara (Spanish yard) might vary depending on the date of the grant. A grant might be to the faldas (Spanish skirt) of the mountains, which could be anywhere from the edge of the foothills to timberline.[5]

gollark: You don't *know* if hosted services won't randomly disappear or make problematic updates or change their business model, and they might not even offer good data exports.
gollark: I don't like non-self-hosted applications for critical stuff like notes.
gollark: I see.
gollark: No, why?
gollark: This is why I have been recently suffering when trying to get Markdown parsing done.

See also

Notes
  1. "Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo" The Avalon Project, Yale Law School, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA Archived 2006-08-04 at the Wayback Machine
  2. California Powder Works v. Davis (January 22, 1894) 151 U.S. 389, 395 citing Chief Justice Waite in Phillips v. Mound City Land and Water Association (February 13, 1888) 124 U.S. 605, 610
  3. "An Act to ascertain and settle the private Land Claims in the State of California" March 3, 1851, 9 Statutes at Large 631 (sometimes referred to as the Mexican Claims Act).
  4. "no claimant could secure such legislative confirmation of his title unless he had money enough to go to Washington, organize a lobby, fight or buy off bloodsuckers and wield sufficient influence to get a bill through Congress for such purposes." Stone, W.F. (1904) "The United States Court of Private Land Claims" New Mexico Bar Association Minutes of the Annual Meeting p. 7
  5. Reeve, Frank D. (1961) History of New Mexico Lewis Historical Publishing Co., New York, vol. 2, p.255
  6. Stone, W.F. (1904) "The United States Court of Private Land Claims" New Mexico Bar Association Minutes of the Annual Meeting p. 7

Further reading
  • Bradfute, Richard Wells (1975) The Court of Private Land Claims: the adjudication of Spanish and Mexican land grant titles, 1891-1904 University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, New Mexico, ISBN 0-8263-0362-5
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.