United Nations Security Council Resolution 2078

United Nations Security Council Resolution 2078 was unanimously adopted on 28 November 2012.

UN Security Council
Resolution 2078
Democratic Republic of the Congo Map
Date28 November 2012
Meeting no.6,873
CodeS/RES/2078 (Document)
SubjectThe situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
Voting summary
  • 15 voted for
  • None voted against
  • None abstained
ResultAdopted
Security Council composition
Permanent members
Non-permanent members

The Security Council renewed until 1 February 2014 the measures on arms imposed by paragraph 1 of resolution 1807 (2008), renew the measures on transport and the financial and travel measures imposed by that resolution.

Observations

In the preamble of the resolution, the Council reiterated its concern about the situation in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo due to the M23 rebellion. The Security Council condemned the continuing violation of resolutions 1533 (2004), 1807 (2008), 1857 (2008), 1896 (2009), 1952 (2010) and 2021 (2011). It also condemned human rights abuses and humanitarian law violations against civilians.

Acts

Acting under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter, the Council renewed the arms embargo concerning the Democratic Republic of the Congo until February 1, 2014, along with travel, financial and transport sanctions. Meanwhile, the Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon was requested to extend the mandate of the group of experts established in resolution 1533 (2004) and renewed by subsequent resolutions until February 1, 2014. The group was asked to present to the Council a mid-term report by 28 June 2013 and a final report before 13 December 2013.

The Resolution condemned the March 23 Movement for its attacks on the civilian population and MONUSCO peacekeepers, and demands the rebels groups in the area (FDLR, LRA, Mai-Mai militias, FNL and ADF) to cease immediately all forms of violence.

gollark: Anyway, it generally seems more practical than dealing with individual atoms to make fission waste somewhat less bad.
gollark: I think the US's NIF thing and eventually ITER.
gollark: We have fusion right now, it just isn't very good.
gollark: There are quite a lot of atoms in things.
gollark: Are you not wearing goggles then? That sounds unsafe.

See also

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.