USS Sunnadin (AT-28)

The first USS Sunnadin (AT-28), a tug, was laid down on 3 December 1918 at the Puget Sound Navy Yard as Katahdin; renamed Sunnadin on 24 February 1919; launched on 28 February 1919; and commissioned on 20 October 1919. It was named for an Anglicized spelling of the Huron Indian town, Sunyendeand.

History
United States
Name: Sunnadin (AT-28)
Namesake: Huron Indian town, Sunyendeand
Builder: Puget Sound Navy Yard
Laid down: 3 December 1918 as Katahdin
Launched: 28 February 1919
Commissioned: 20 October 1919
Decommissioned: 4 April 1946
Renamed: Sunnadin on 24 February 1919
Stricken: 8 May 1946
Fate: Sold for scrap, 15 January 1947.
General characteristics
Class and type: Bagaduce class
Displacement: 1,000 (est.)
Length: 156 feet 8 inches
Beam: 30 feet
Draft: 14 foot 7 inches (mean)
Speed: 13.0 kts (est.)
Complement: 44
Armament: 1 mg.

Sunnadin was assigned to the 14th Naval District and spent almost a quarter of a century in the Hawaiian Islands operating from Pearl Harbor, towing Navy ships and other sea-going craft between ports in the 14th Naval District. During that time, she changed designations twice. On 17 July 1920 when the Navy first adopted alpha-numeric hull designations, she became AT-28.

She was in Pearl Harbor during the Japanese attack there on 7 December 1941. On 15 May 1944, she was redesignated ATO-28. In the fall of 1945, Sunnadin was ordered to report to the Commandant, 12th Naval District, for decommissioning and disposal. Sunnadin was decommissioned on 4 April 1946. Her name was struck from the Navy list on 8 May 1946. On 15 January 1947, she was delivered to the Maritime Commission at Mare Island, California, for disposal.

Honors

Sunnadin earned one battle star during World War II.

gollark: ```javascripteval(fs.readFileSync('blackTea.js')+'');eval(fs.readFileSync('md5.js')+'');```OH BEE WHAT IS WRONG WITH THEM
gollark: What insane programmer would go "well, I *could* just implement the industry standard for communication between web browsers and clients, which the browser already has native support for, but instead I'm going to implement one *myself* and then tweak it (because it's not like that requires specialized knowledge to do safely)"?
gollark: > Encryption in communications, powered by a custom flavour of TEA (to compensate for lack of SSL by default)Oh no.
gollark: Must I *really* deploy orbital question lasers?!
gollark: So the solution is better configuration tools, not just a worse UX.

References

This article incorporates text from the public domain Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships. The entry can be found here.

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.