Tulane Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property

The Tulane Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property (JTIP) is a student-edited journal of the Tulane University Law School.[1] JTIP examines legal issues relating to technology, including topics such as antitrust, computer law, contracts, constitutional law, copyrights, information privacy, patents, torts, trade secrets, trademarks, and all other policy implications of law and technology in society.

Tulane Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property
A typical JTIP cover.
DisciplineIntellectual property law
LanguageEnglish
Publication details
Historyfounded in 1997
Publisher
FrequencyAnnual
Standard abbreviations
BluebookTul. J. Tech. & Intell. Prop.
ISO 4Tulane J. Technol. Intellect. Prop.
Indexing
ISSN1533-3531
Links

Membership

JTIP's editorial members are second- and third-year law students who work under the guidance of faculty advisors. Membership is determined by an annual write-on competition.

2016-2017 Board
  • Editor in Chief: Casey Ebner
  • Senior Articles Editor: Jake Kronish

2015-2016 Board
  • Editor in Chief: Alexandra Triana
  • Senior Managing Editor: Joshua Mastracci
  • Senior Notes & Comments Editor: Alexandrea Kinzinger
  • Senior Articles Editor: Lillian Grappe
  • Senior Business Editor: Kyle Sutton
  • Senior Symposium Editor: Caitlin Poor
  • Senior Communications Editor: Toni Xu

2011-2012 Board
  • Editor in Chief: Chad Sanders
  • Senior Managing Editor: Matthew DeIulio
  • Senior Notes & Comments Editor: Russell Withers
  • Senior Business Editor: Jacklina Len
  • Senior Communications Editor: Brooke Childers

2011-2012 Managing Editors
  • Anastasia Caton
  • David Gershel
  • Matthew Horton
  • Tela Justice
  • Brittany Kendig
  • Cameron Malone
  • Jennifer Necas
  • Jordan Parker
  • Shana Pollack
  • Steven Sarpy
  • Paul Spradley
  • Christopher Stow-Serge

Significant articles
  • Thomas P. Haggerty (2006). "Note, "A Blue Note: The Sixth Circuit, Product Design and the Confusion Doctrines in Gibson Guitar Corp. v. Paul Reed Smith Guitars, LP 8 Tul". J. of Tech. & Intell. Prop. 219.
gollark: 9 out of 10 dentists recommend V.
gollark: V "exists" but does NOT satisfy its promises.
gollark: It compiles 10MLOC/core/Hz, it's just amazing.
gollark: osmarkscalculator™ is superior, broadly speaking.
gollark: It's one of those accursed perluous things where you need runtime information to parse.

See also

References
  1. "Tulane Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property". Tulane Law School.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.