Tufted capuchin

The tufted capuchin (Sapajus apella), also known as brown capuchin, black-capped capuchin, or pin monkey is a New World primate from South America. As traditionally defined, it is one of the most widespread primates in the Neotropics, but it has recently been recommended considering the black-striped, black and golden-bellied capuchins as separate species in a new genus, thereby effectively limiting the tufted capuchin to the Amazon basin and nearby regions.[1]

Tufted capuchin[1]

Least Concern  (IUCN 3.1)[2]
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Primates
Suborder: Haplorhini
Infraorder: Simiiformes
Family: Cebidae
Genus: Sapajus
Species:
S. apella
Binomial name
Sapajus apella
Geographic range following taxonomy used by IUCN
Synonyms
  • Cebus apella Linnaeus, 1758
  • Simia apella Linnaeus, 1758
  • Simia fatuellus Linnaeus, 1766

The tufted capuchin is an omnivorous animal, mostly feeding on fruits and invertebrates, although it sometimes feeds on small vertebrates (e.g. lizards and bird chicks) and other plant parts. It can be found in many different kinds of environment, including moist tropical and subtropical forest, dry forest, and disturbed or secondary forest.

Like other capuchins, it is a social animal, forming groups of 8 to 15 individuals that are led by an alpha or dominant male.

Taxonomy and phylogeny

At one point all tufted capuchins were classified as Cebus apella.[3][4] Under such taxonomy, the range of C. apella would extend throughout much of South America from Colombia to northern Argentina. More recent taxonomic studies have been carried out by Torres de Assumpção (1983; Torres 1988).[5] Groves (2005) recognized the following subspecies for the tufted capuchins:[1]

  • Cebus apella apella (Linnaeus, 1758)
  • Cebus apella fatuellus (Linnaeus, 1766)
  • Large-headed capuchin, Cebus apella macrocephalus Spix, 1823
  • Cebus apella margaritae Hollister, 1914
  • Cebus apella peruanus Thomas, 1901
  • Cebus apella tocantinus Lönnberg, 1939

In 2011, Jessica Lynch Alfaro et al proposed that the robust capuchins such (formerly the C. apella group) be placed in a separate genus, Sapajus, from the gracile capuchins (formerly the C. capucinus group) which retain the genus Cebus.[6][7]

Physical characteristics
Skeleton

The tufted capuchin is more powerfully built than the other capuchins, with rougher fur and a long, thick tail. It has a bundle of long, hardened hair on the forehead that can be raised as a sort of "wig". The fur is brownish gray, with the belly being somewhat lighter-colored than the rest of the body. The hands and feet are black. The tail is prehensile: strong and can be used for grasping, as an extra limb.

The tufted capuchin has a head-body length of 32 to 57 centimetres (13 to 22 in), a tail length of 38 to 56 centimetres (15 to 22 in), and a weight of 1.9 to 4.8 kilograms (4.2 to 10.6 lb), with the males generally being larger and heavier than the females.

Behaviour and ecology
Male tufted capuchin

The tufted capuchin is a diurnal, arboreal primate species, but it often forages on the ground to search for food or to walk longer distances between trees that are too far apart to jump.

The tufted capuchin lives in groups of two to twenty or more animals. A single group usually contains at least one adult male, but mixed groups with multiple males do also occur. In that case, one of the males is dominant. He accepts only a few monkeys in his direct surroundings, mainly younger animals and a few females. The dominant male and the group members that are close to him have the privilege to eat first in case of food scarcity, while subordinate monkeys have to wait until they are ready.

After a gestation period of 180 days, one young is born, or incidentally a twin. This young, which weighs only 200 to 250 grams, is carried on the back of its mother. The mother feeds her child for 9 months, but the young are sexually immature until its seventh year, which is quite late for a primate of its size.

Important natural enemies of the capuchin are large birds of prey. They are so afraid of those birds, that they even become alarmed when a harmless bird flies over.

The tufted capuchin rubs urine on its hands and feet in order to attract mates and reduce stress.[8]

Diet

A recently discovered characteristic of one population of this species is that it uses stones as a tool to open hard nuts. First it chooses ripe nuts from a nut palm. It uses its teeth to strip off the nut's fibrous husk. Then it leaves the nut to dry for about a week. When the nut is dry, the monkey lays the nut on a large, flat rock or fallen tree,[9] hammering the nut with a suitable stone until the nut cracks. The hammerstones are often large enough to require lifting with both hands. The anvil rock is often pockmarked with hollows as a result of repeated use.[10][11]

Besides nuts, the capuchin also eats fruit, insects and larvae, eggs and young birds, frogs, lizards, rodents and even bats. They are also known to chase cats.

The tufted capuchin looks for its food in groups. As soon as one of the group members has found something edible, he or she may make a large whistling sound, dependent upon the proximity of other individuals and abundance of the food resource so that the other monkeys know that there is something to eat.[12] The composition of the group is very well organized and is determined by rank in the hierarchy. The dominant male often resides somewhere in the middle of the group just behind the front line, so that it is safer when a predator attacks. The vanguard is composed of higher-ranked females who are tolerated by the dominant male. They have the privilege to reach the food first, but they are also the most vulnerable when a predator attacks.

Tool use and manufacture

The tufted capuchin has been observed using containers to hold water, using sticks (to dig nuts, to dip for syrup, to catch ants, to reach food), using sponges to absorb juice, using stones as hammer and chisel to penetrate a barrier[13] and using stones as hammer and anvil to crack nuts.[14] While some of these tasks are relatively simple by cognitive standards (e.g. using a stick to catch ants), others, like cracking nuts with hammer and anvil are only exceeded in complexity by chimpanzees.[15]

The potential for tool use in animals like the tufted capuchin depends on a number of conditions that would increase its likelihood of appearing in a given species. Van Schaik proposed that the occurrence of tool use would be likely in foraging species if three factors were present: manual dexterity, intelligence, and social tolerance.[16] As it applies to manual dexterity, capuchins are capable of a limited precision grip (the ability to delicately pinch and manipulate objects with the thumb and fingertips), which is not found in any other New World monkeys and only found in limited amounts in apes.[17][18] C. apella has an encephalization ratio greater than the hominids (except humans) and a neocortex ratio that is almost as large as the apes; both of these rough indicators suggest high intelligence.[19][20] Finally, the tufted capuchin forms social groups typical of a complex and tolerant society.[21][22]

The tufted capuchin has been observed manufacturing tools both in captivity and in the wild. In captivity, it has been reported as making probing sticks to reach normally inaccessible containers with syrup.[23] It is also capable of understanding the concept of "sponging" and using paper towels, monkey biscuits, sticks, leaves and straw to sop up juice and then suck on the sponge to consume the juice.[23] Research in the wild has shown that capuchin tool use is every bit as extensive as in captivity with capuchins being observed using stones to dig holes to get at tubers, an activity previously only seen in humans.[24] The practice of using stones to crack nuts has arisen spontaneously in many locations such as in the Caatinga Dry Forest[24] and Serra da Capivara National Park,[25] all in Brazil and hundreds of miles apart. It has been observed cracking various nuts and fruits such as palm nuts (Attalea and Astrocaryum spp.)[26] and jatobá fruits.(Hymenaea courbaril)[25] The tufted capuchin has even been observed using stones to dislodge other stones that would later be used as hammers or shovels, an example of a more complex tool using behavior known as second-order tool use previously only found in chimpanzees.[25] Curiously, not all tufted capuchins engage in tool use. Moura and Lee (2004)[27] suggest lack of other food sources as the key factor. Ottoni and Mannu (2001),[28] Fragaszy et al. (2004)[26] and Visalberghi et al. (2005)[29] have proposed this is likely more a factor of a monkey's terrestrial habit: the more time a monkey spends on the ground, the more likely it is to profit from (and thus engage in) tool use.

In captivity, the tufted capuchin has been seen to manufacture stone tools that produced simple flakes and cores. Some of the capuchins even used these sharpened stones to cut (in a back-and-forth motion) barriers in order to reach food.[30] The importance of this behavior is that it serves as evidence of mechanical proclivity to modify stones by using behaviors already in the monkeys' repertoires, and this behavior is seen as a precursor to stone-knapping.[17] This early and limited tool use behavior has been hypothesized as similar to pre-Homo habilis and that artifacts of that time would probably resemble those of capuchins.[30]

S. apella tool manufacture and use has been analyzed for potential clues to social learning and problem solving ability, as tool manufacture and use can often shed light on such complex cognitive abilities.[13][31] Social learning, or the ability to learn from other individuals, is a controversial topic in most nonhuman species like S. apella because of the relative difficulty of determining whether a behavior was learned from imitation or a much simpler form of social learning.[32] One way of closing the gap between concurrent tool related behaviors and their likelihood of arising from imitation is by narrowing down events that would make social learning more probable such as a preference for observing experienced tool users. In this regard, Ottoni and his team found that young capuchins tended to observe the best tool users when cracking nuts.[14]

An example of the Doorian Fruit, a box that can open in one of two ways (see image for more info).

Another way of isolating imitation from other simpler behaviors is to present the capuchins with a box that has food but has two different ways of opening it. The important point is that neither way should be more advantageous so that the monkey can freely choose one. In one such study, when humans opened the door in front of the monkeys using one way only, the monkeys used that method, even when they discovered the alternative on their own.[33] In another study, capuchin alphas from two separate groups were trained to open the door in a specific way, after which the monkeys were paired with subordinates who learned to open the door in the same way.[34] When capuchins are trained in the same way and this time released into their groups, the habit is once again disseminated amongst all group members even when others discover alternative ways.[35] Nevertheless, the subject of whether or not S. apella learns by imitation is still controversial, because of the inherent difficulty in teasing out unambiguous evidence of a complex cognitive process such as imitation.[33][36]

Problem solving

Tool use and manufacture can also shed light on the many aspects of the tufted capuchin's cognitive abilities by determining how it solves some problems. Some non-primates manufacture and use objects as tools. Crows are known to make hook-tools for catching insects,[37] but such activities lack the behavioral plasticity of tool use as evidenced in tufted capuchins who found new ways to use tools that other species could not.[38] But this plasticity in tool use, while suggesting greater complexity and cognitive ability, does not suggest that the monkeys understand cause and effect. It instead implies they are only able to learn from successful efforts but not from failures nor are they able to refine and improve much.[39] Its ability to repeat successes, coupled with its complex repertoire of behavioral events helps to explain the tufted capuchin's extensive repertoire of innovative behaviors besides tool use.[39]

Distribution and habitat

This species lives in the northern Amazon rainforest of the Guyanas, Venezuela and Brazil and to the west of the Rio Negro, as far north as the Orinoco in Venezuela. It is also found in eastern Colombia, Ecuador, Bolivia, Peru, including the upper Andean Magdalena valley in Colombia. An introduced breeding population is well established in the northwestern peninsula of the island of Trinidad in the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago. It can be found in a large variety of forest types, mainly in tropical rainforests (up till a height of 2700 m), but also in more open forests.

The distribution overlaps with that of other species of capuchins, such as the white-fronted capuchin (Cebus albifrons).

gollark: ÆÆ
gollark: WHY IS THERE NO PACKAGE.JSON
gollark: JStupidity™
gollark: Actually, three.
gollark: Well, twoish.

References
  1. Groves, C. P. (2005). Wilson, D. E.; Reeder, D. M. (eds.). Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 137. ISBN 0-801-88221-4. OCLC 62265494.
  2. Rylands, A.B.; Boubli, J.-P.; Mittermeier, R.A.; Wallace, R.B.; Ceballos-Mago, N. (2015). "Sapajus apella". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2015: e.T39949A70610943. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-1.RLTS.T39949A70610943.en.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
  3. Hershkovitz, Philip (1949). "Mammals of northern Colombia. Preliminary report No. 4: Monkeys (primates), with taxonomic revisions of some forms". Proceedings of the United States National Museum. 98 (3232): 1–323. doi:10.5479/si.00963801.98-3232.323.
  4. Hershkovitz, Philip (1955). "Notes on American monkeys of the genus Cebus". Journal of Mammalogy. 36 (3): 449–452. doi:10.2307/1375688. JSTOR 1375688.
  5. Torres, Marguerite; Fragaszy, D.M.; Izar, P.; Hinley, A.J.; Ottoni, E.B.; Visalberghi, E. (2007). "Modelling the monkey habitat in Brazil" (PDF). Geospatial Today (5): 26–35. Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 July 2011.
  6. Lynch Alfaro, J.W.; et al. (2011). "Explosive Pleistocene range expansion leads to widespread Amazonian sympatry between robust and gracile capuchin monkeys" (PDF). Journal of Biogeography. 39 (2): 272–288. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02609.x. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 February 2015.
  7. Lynch Alfaro, J.W.; Silva, j. & Rylands, A.B. (2012). "How Different Are Robust and Gracile Capuchin Monkeys? An Argument for the Use of Sapajus and Cebus". American Journal of Primatology. 74 (4): 1–14. doi:10.1002/ajp.22007. PMID 22328205.
  8. "Randy monkeys wash hands, feet in urine. Scientists believe waste-bathing might also calm the primates". 25 September 2007. Retrieved 4 January 2008.
  9. Madden, M.; Fragaszy, D.M.; Izar, P.; Hinley, A.J.; Ottoni, E.B.; Visalberghi, E. (2007). "Modelling the monkey habitat in Brazil" (PDF). Geospatial Today (5): 26–35. Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 July 2011.
  10. Discovery "Life" series, "Challenges of Life" episode, David Attenborough
  11. Waga, IC; Dacier, A.K.; Pinha, P.S.; Tavares, M.C.H. (2005). "Spontaneous Tool Use by Wild Capuchin Monkeys (Cebus libidinosus) in the Cerrado". Folia Primatologica. 77 (5): 337–344. doi:10.1159/000093698. PMID 16912501.
  12. Di Bitetti; Mario S. (2005). "Food-associated calls and audience effects in tufted capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella nigritus". Animal Behaviour. 69 (4): 911–919. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.05.021.
  13. Westergaard, Gregory Charles (February 1995). "The subsistence technology of capuchins". International Journal of Primatology. 16 (1): 899–906. doi:10.1007/BF02736075.
  14. Ottoni, Eduardo; Briseida Dogo de Resende; Patrícia Izar (2005). "Watching the best nutcrackers: what capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) know about others' tool-using skills". Animal Cognition. 8 (4): 215–219. doi:10.1007/s10071-004-0245-8. PMID 15719240.
  15. Westergaard, Gregory Charles (1999). "Structural analysis of tool-use by tufted capuchins (Cebus apella) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)". Animal Cognition. 2 (3): 141–145. doi:10.1007/s100710050034.
  16. van Schaik, Carel; Deaner R; Merrill M (1999). "The conditions for tool use in primates: implications for the evolution of material culture" (PDF). Journal of Human Evolution. 36 (6): 719–741. doi:10.1006/jhev.1999.0304. PMID 10330335.
  17. Cummins-Sebree, SE; Fragaszy DM (2005). Capuchins as Stone-knappers?: an Evaluation of the Evidence. Stone Knapping: The Necessary Conditions for a Uniquely Hominin Behaviour. Cambridge, England: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research. p. 171. ISBN 978-1-902937-34-2.
  18. Costello, M; D. Fragaszy (1988). "Prehension in Cebus and Saimiri: Grip type and hand preference". American Journal of Primatology. 15 (3): 235–245. doi:10.1002/ajp.1350150306. PMID 31968893.
  19. Rilling, James; Thomas R. Insel (August 1999). "The primate neocortex in comparative perspective using magnetic resonance imaging". Journal of Human Evolution. 37 (2): 191–223. doi:10.1006/jhev.1999.0313. PMID 10444351.
  20. Dunbar, Robin (1998). "The social brain hypothesis". Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews. 6 (5): 178–190. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6505(1998)6:5<178::AID-EVAN5>3.0.CO;2-8. Archived from the original on 21 October 2012.
  21. Izar, Patricia (2004). "Female social relationships of Cebus apella nigritus in a southeastern Atlantic forest". Behaviour. 141 (1): 71–99. doi:10.1163/156853904772746619.
  22. Visalberghi, Elisabetta; D. Fragaszy (1995). "The behaviour of capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella, with novel food: the role of social context". Animal Behaviour. 49 (4): 1089–1095. doi:10.1006/anbe.1995.0137.
  23. Westergaard, Gregory Charles; D. Fragaszy (1987). "The manufacture and use of tools by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella)". Journal of Comparative Psychology. 101 (2): 159–168. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.101.2.159.
  24. Moura, A.C.; Lee, PC (2004). "Capuchin stone tool use in Caatinga dry forest". Science. 306 (5703): 1909. doi:10.1126/science.1102558. PMID 15591195.
  25. Mannu, Massimo; Eduardo Ottoni (2009). "The enhanced tool-kit of two groups of wild bearded capuchin monkeys in the Caatinga: tool making, associative use, and secondary tools". American Journal of Primatology. 71 (3): 242–251. doi:10.1002/ajp.20642. PMID 19051323. Archived from the original on 5 January 2013.
  26. Fragaszy, D.; Izar, P.; Visalberghi, E.; Ottoni, E. B.; de Oliveira, M. G. (2004). "Wild capuchin monkeys (Cebus libidinosus) use anvils and stone pounding tools". American Journal of Primatology. 64 (4): 359–366. doi:10.1002/ajp.20085. PMID 15580579. Archived from the original on 5 January 2013. Retrieved 4 December 2009.
  27. Moura, A. C. de A.; Lee, P. C. (2004). "Capuchin Stone Tool Use in Caatinga Dry Forest". Science. 306 (5703): 1909. doi:10.1126/science.1102558. PMID 15591195.
  28. Ottoni, Eduardo B.; Mannu, Massimo (2001). "Semifree-ranging Tufted Capuchins (Cebus apella) Spontaneously Use Tools to Crack Open Nuts". International Journal of Primatology. 22 (3): 347–358. doi:10.1023/A:1010747426841.
  29. Visalberghi; et al. (2005). "Terrestriality and Tool Use". Science. 308 (5724): 951–952. doi:10.1126/science.308.5724.951c. PMID 15890860.
  30. Westergaard, Gregory Charles; Stephen J. Suomi (December 1995). "The stone tools of capuchins (Cebus apella)". International Journal of Primatology. 16 (6): 1017–1024. doi:10.1007/BF02696114.
  31. Visalberghi, Elisabetta; Trinca L (1989). "Tool use in capuchin monkeys: Distinguishing between performing and understanding". Primates. 30 (4): 511–521. doi:10.1007/BF02380877.
  32. Fragaszy, Dorothy; Elisabetta Visalberghi (1989). "Social influences on the acquisition of tool-using behaviors in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella)". Journal of Comparative Psychology. 103 (2): 159–170. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.103.2.159. PMID 2736909.
  33. Custance, D; Whiten A; Fredman T (1999). "Social learning of an artificial fruit task in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella)". Journal of Comparative Psychology. 113 (1): 13–22. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.113.1.13.
  34. Dindo, M; Thierry B; Whiten A (2008). "Social diffusion of novel foraging methods in brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella)". Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 275 (1631): 187–93. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.1318. PMC 2596191. PMID 17971322.
  35. Dindo, M; Whiten A; De Waal F (2009). Ferrari, Pier Francesco (ed.). "In-Group Conformity Sustains Different Foraging Traditions in Capuchin Monkeys (Cebus apella)". PLOS ONE. 4 (11): e7858. Bibcode:2009PLoSO...4.7858D. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007858. PMC 2773420. PMID 19924242.
  36. Visalberghi, Elisabetta; Fragaszy DM (2002). " Do Monkeys Ape?"-Ten Years After. Imitation in animals and artifacts. MIT Press. p. 494. ISBN 978-0-262-04203-1.
  37. Hunt, Gavin (1996). "Manufacture and use of hook-tools by New Caledonian crows". Nature. 379 (6562): 249–251. Bibcode:1996Natur.379..249H. doi:10.1038/379249a0.
  38. Cummins-Sebree, SE; D. Fragaszy (2005). "Choosing and using tools: Capuchins (Cebus apella) use a different metric than tamarins (Saguinus oedipus)". Journal of Comparative Psychology. 119 (9): 210–219. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.119.2.210. PMID 15982164.
  39. Visalberghi, Elisabetta; Limognelli L. (1994). "Lack of comprehension of cause-effect relations in tool-using capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella)". Journal of Comparative Psychology. 108 (1): 511–521. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.108.1.15. PMID 8174341.

Further reading


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.