To Be or Not to Be (album)

To Be or Not to Be is Nightmare's ninth full-length studio album. As all of their recent album releases, it came in three different versions, each with different artwork.[1] The two limited editions (Types A & B), each come with different DVD tracks while the standard edition (Type C) came with one extra song. The album peaked #11 in the Oricon charts.

To Be or Not to Be
Studio album by
ReleasedMarch 19, 2014
Genre
Length53:15
LabelAvex, HPQ
ProducerNightmare

Track listing

Regular Edition (Type C)
No.TitleLength
1."Gallows"4:45
2."TO BE OR NOT TO BE"2:29
3."Dizzy"3:50
4."tokyo-to rasetsu-ku (東京都羅刹区)"4:14
5."rewrite (リライト)"3:53
6."Melt into blue sky."5:06
7."-TRUTH-"3:44
8."Lulla[by≠bye]"6:00
9."TERMINAL"4:23
10."Drastica (ドラスティカ)"3:59
11."gokujou noushin rengoku isshiki (極上脳震煉獄・弌式)"4:35
12."L.L.B"4:01
13."Kenka Drive - instrumental- [Note 1]"4:11
Total length:53:15

Limited Edition A

Type A Bonus DVD Track
No.TitleLength
13."Gallows PV + Making" 

Limited Edition B

Type B Bonus DVD Track
No.TitleLength
13."Drastica (ドラスティカ) PV + Making" 

NOTES

  1. Track only included on Type C album

Single Information

  • Rewrite (リライト)
Released: January 8, 2014
Oricon Chart Peak Position: #2[2]
  • Dizzy
Released: August 21, 2013
Oricon Chart Peak Position: #13[3]
gollark: Writing a bare metal microkernel in Haskell is not very practical.
gollark: > I never tried it. It's nice that it has these safety features but I prefer C++ still. > If I want to be sure that my program is free of bugs, I can write a formal specification and do a > correctness proof with the hoare calculus in some theorem proofer (People did that for the seL4 microkernel, which is free from bugs under some assumptions and used in satellites, nuclear power plants and such)Didn't doing that for seL4 require several hundred thousand lines of proof code?
gollark: Most countries have insanely convoluted tax law so I assume it's possible.
gollark: Hmm, so you need to obtain a hypercomputer of some sort to write your tax forms such that they cannot plausibly be checked?
gollark: What if it's somehow really easy to find *a* solution to something, but not specific ones, and hard to check the validity of a specific maybe-solution? Is that possible?

References

  1. "New Album「TO BE OR NOT TO BE」2014年3月19日Release!☆3/25 NIGHTMARE TOUR 2014「TO BE OR NOT TO BE:That is the Question.」グッズ情報!!" (in Japanese). Nightmare. 2014-07-30. Retrieved 30 July 2014.
  2. "Oricon Charts - Rewrite" (in Japanese). Oricon. Retrieved 30 July 2014.
  3. "Dizzy - Oricon Charts". Retrieved 30 July 2014.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.