The Sword of Hope II

The Sword of Hope II,[1] known in Japan as Selection II: Ankoku no Fuuin (セレクションII 暗黒の封印), is a 1992 role-playing video game developed and published by Kemco for the Game Boy.

Selection II: Ankoku no Fuuin
The Sword of Hope II
Front of the Japanese box artwork.
Developer(s)Kemco
Publisher(s)Kemco
Platform(s)Game Boy, 3DS Virtual Console
ReleaseGame Boy
  • JP: September 4, 1992
  • NA: September 1996
Selection I & II
  • JP: May 1, 1998
3DS Virtual Console
  • NA: July 12, 2012
  • JP: June 13, 2012
  • EU: August 9, 2012
Genre(s)Role-playing video game
Mode(s)Single-player

It is the sequel to the 1989 The Sword of Hope. In 1998, these two games were rereleased in Japan as a single Game Boy cartridge, Selection I & II. The Sword of Hope II was released for the 3DS Virtual Console in 2012.

A "dungeon crawler"-type game, the player must retrieve the Sword of Hope, which has been stolen, and find the evil Zakdos who has been set free after being imprisoned.

Reception

The four reviewers of Electronic Gaming Monthly were mostly dissatisfied by the game, with their main complaint being that the battles are much too slow and time-consuming, making combat and travel a chore rather than a pleasure. Crispin Boyer and Sushi-X, however, found that it was still a decent enough game for those who liked the first game in the series or simply wanted a portable RPG. They scored it a 5.25 out of 10.[2] GamePro it a negative review, citing the generic, slow, overly frequent, and repetitive battles.[3]

Notes

  1. Packaging refers to the game as "Sword of Hope II". The 3DS Virtual Console release is going by the game itself and so ignores this.
  2. "Review Crew: Sword of Hope II". Electronic Gaming Monthly. No. 86. Ziff Davis. September 1996. p. 30.
  3. "Sword of Hope II". GamePro. No. 100. IDG. January 1997. p. 45.
gollark: No, it's definitely either monoids or monads.
gollark: MRE = monoidal recency encapsulation.
gollark: I'll probably just patch over the particularly awful style changes with CSS style sheets I guess, and technically violate the TOS.
gollark: I don't think that would be an accessibility issue as much as a general unusability problem.
gollark: Hmm. I don't know why I thought I would remember this.


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.