The School of Night

The School of Night is a modern name for a group of men centred on Sir Walter Raleigh that was once referred to in 1592 as the "School of Atheism". The group supposedly included poets and scientists Christopher Marlowe, George Chapman, Matthew Roydon and Thomas Harriot.[1]

Walter Raleigh
George Chapman
Thomas Harriot
Christopher Marlowe

There is no firm evidence that all of these men were known to each other, but speculation about their connections features prominently in some writing about the Elizabethan era.

Name
Robert Persons SJ, who denounced Raleigh's "School of atheism"

Raleigh was first named as the centre of "The School of Atheism" by the Jesuit priest Robert Persons in 1592,[2] but "The School of Night" is a modern name: the theory that this so-called school was a clandestine intellectual coterie was launched by Arthur Acheson, on textual grounds, in Shakespeare and the Rival Poet (1903).[3][4] The new wording derives from a passage in Act IV, scene 3 of Shakespeare's Love's Labours Lost, in which the King of Navarre says "Black is the badge of hell / The hue of dungeons and the school of night."[5] Acheson's proposal was endorsed by notable editors John Dover Wilson and Arthur Quiller Couch in their 1923 edition of Love's Labours Lost.[6] There are, however, at least two other recorded renderings of the line, one reading "suit of night"[5][7] and the other as "scowl of night".[8]

The context of the lines has nothing to do with cabals: the King is simply mocking the black hair of Rosaline, his friend Berowne's lover. John Kerrigan explains that the line is perfectly straightforward as it stands, a riposte to Berowne's praise of his dark-haired mistress as "fair", and any attempts to load it with topical significance are misleading; the simple meaning of "black is the school where night learns to be black" is all that is required.[9]

In 1936 Frances Yates found an unpublished essay on scholarship by the Earl of Northumberland, an associate of Raleigh and supposed member of the movement, and interpreted the earl's mockery of the "precious affectations" found among scholars as inspiring the key celibacy theme of the play.[10] The supposition is discounted as fanciful by some, but nonetheless received acceptance by some prominent commentators of the time.[5][11][12]

Atheism

It is alleged that each of these men studied science, philosophy, and religion, and all were suspected of atheism. Atheism at that time was a charge nearly the equivalent of treason, since the English monarch after Henry VIII's reforms was the head of the Church of England, and to be against the church was, ipso facto, to be against the monarch. However, it was also a name for anarchy, and was a charge frequently brought against the politically troublesome. Richard Baines, an anti-Catholic spy for her Majesty's Privy Council, whose "task was presumably to provide his masters with what they required",[13] charged in an unsworn deposition that he had heard from another that Marlowe had "read the Atheist lecture to Sr. Walter Raleigh [and] others". This tale of hearsay, from a paid informer, failed to substantiate the charges of atheism against the group, but it did include a promise of more evidence to be revealed at a later date.[14]

In culture

Since the early 1990s (by which point the School of Night hypothesis had fallen out of mainstream academic favour), the School of Night has frequently been represented in fiction.[4]

A play titled The School of Night, by Peter Whelan, dealing with the relationship between Shakespeare and Christopher Marlowe, was presented by the Royal Shakespeare Company at The Other Place theatre in November 1992.[15] The School of Night also figures prominently in novels: The Scholars of Night (1988) by John M. Ford, a Cold War thriller involving an undiscovered Christopher Marlowe play; A Dead Man in Deptford (1993) by Anthony Burgess; Veronica (1996) by Nicholas Christopher; The School of Night (2001) by Alan Wall, a story of a present-day researcher who becomes obsessed by connections between Shakespeare's plays and members of the "school"; The School of Night (2010) by Louis Bayard; and Shadow of Night (2012) by Deborah Harkness.

The School of Night is also the name of a group of actors and improvisers inspired by the original group and brought together under the auspices of the celebrated theatrical maverick Ken Campbell. The idea is that this group of poets, playwrights, scientists and thinkers might have collectively written the plays attributed to the Bard. The modern-day School of Night shows feature improvisation in the style of poets and playwrights suggested by the audience, and generally includes the creation (or in the jargon of the show 'channeling') of a lost Shakespearean masterpiece.[16]

gollark: I'd expect that filtering would be much harder to add than pagination, but we got *that*.
gollark: Rough sketch.
gollark: PAGINATION🐶
gollark: ```Pagination[RANDOM MEME STUFF]Trade Hub```
gollark: 🇵 🅰 🇬 🇮 🇳 🇦 🇹 🇮 🅾 🇳

References
  1. Boas, Frederick Samuel (1940). Christopher Marlowe: a biographical and critical study. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  2. Stone, Jean (1905). Studies from Court and Cloister. London: Sands and Co. p. 145. OCLC 35767412.
  3. Acheson, Arthur (1903). Shakespeare and The Rival Poet; displaying Shakespeare as a satirist and proving the identity of the patron and the rival of the sonnets. London: John Lane. OCLC 268858.
  4. Reid, Lindsay Ann (17 December 2014). "The Spectre of the School of Night: Former Scholarly Fictions and the Stuff of Academic Fiction". Early Modern Literary Studies. Sheffield Hallam University. (23): 1–31. ISSN 1201-2459. Retrieved 15 October 2018.
  5. Schoenbaum, S (1991). Shakespeare's Lives. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. p. 537. ISBN 0-19-818618-5. abstruse and eccentric scholarship...the whole superstructure of theory... rests on an insecure foundation
  6. Bradbrook, M. C. (1923). The School of Night: A Study in the Literary Relationships of Sir Walter Ralegh. Cambridge University Press. p. 7.
  7. Woudhuysen, H.R. (ed.). "Act IV scene 3". Love's Labour's Lost. Arden Shakespeare. ISBN 9781408160251.
  8. Craig, W.J., ed. (1905). Complete Works. Oxford University Press. p. 158. OCLC 154643212.
  9. Kerrigan, John (1982). "Introduction". Love's Labour's Lost. The New Penguin Shakespeare. Penguin. ISBN 978-0-14-102055-6.
  10. Yates, Frances (1936). A Study of Love's Labour's Lost. Cambridge University Press. pp. 6–8. ISBN 9781107695986. …a mocking attack on the pretensions of the learned Raleigh group…
  11. Butler, Eliza (1949). Ritual Magic. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. p. 308. ISBN 0-521-29553-X.
  12. Kerrigan (1982): "This theory has recently fallen into disrepute… Still, the notion...persists among readers and theatregoers...and it is worth driving another nail into its coffin."
  13. Kelsall, Malcolm (1981). Christopher Marlowe. Leiden, Netherlands: E.J. Brill. p. 7. ISBN 90-04-06413-3.
  14. "an anonymous informer’s unsupported allegations...hearsay...": Kelsall (1981: 8)
  15. "Archive catalogue". Shakespeare Birthplace Trust. Archived from the original on 2012-10-27. Retrieved 2008-12-03.
  16. "The School of Night – Improvised Shakespeare and other explorations". www.theschoolofnight.com.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.