The Early Four Track Recordings
The Early Four Track Recordings is a compilation album by indie rock band Of Montreal. It contains early recordings from the band, with the song titles telling a fictional story about actor Dustin Hoffman. Though the titles feature Dustin Hoffman, the album name and content have nothing to do with him, and the titles were chosen only for humor.
| The Early Four Track Recordings | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | ||||
| Compilation album by | ||||
| Released | 2001 | |||
| Genre | ||||
| Length | 41:59 | |||
| Label | Kindercore | |||
| Of Montreal chronology | ||||
| ||||
| Review scores | |
|---|---|
| Source | Rating |
| AllMusic |   |
| Pitchfork Media | 7.3/10 link |
Track listing
| No. | Title | Length |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | "Dirty Dustin Hoffman Needs a Bath" | 3:23 |
| 2. | "Dustin Hoffman Gets a Bath" | 1:42 |
| 3. | "Dustin Hoffman Thinks About Eating the Soap" | 3:30 |
| 4. | "Dustin Hoffman Scrubs Too Hard and Loses Soap" | 2:09 |
| 5. | "Dustin Hoffman Does Not Resist Temptation to Eat the Bathtub" | 3:18 |
| 6. | "Dustin Hoffman's Wife Comes Home" | 2:38 |
| 7. | "Dustin Hoffman's Wife Seems Suspicious About the Absent Tub" | 0:58 |
| 8. | "Dustin Hoffman Feigns Ignorance of Missing Bathtub" | 2:23 |
| 9. | "Dustin Hoffman's Wife Calls in Detective to Dust for Porcelain Particles on Dustin Hoffman's Tongue" | 2:19 |
| 10. | "Dustin Hoffman's Tongue Taken to Police Lab Where It Is Used as Toilet Paper and Reading Material While on the Toilet" | 1:13 |
| 11. | "Dustin Hoffman Offers Lame Possible Explanation for Missing Bathtub" | 2:49 |
| 12. | "Dustin Hoffman's Wife Makes a Sarcastic Remark, Cuts the Head Off a Duck, Places It Where the Tub Was and Begins to Groan (Growl)" | 1:27 |
| 13. | "Dustin Hoffman Becomes Indignant and Wets Himself" | 5:09 |
| 14. | "Dustin Hoffman Quits Bathroom and Climbs a Tree" | 2:24 |
| 15. | "Dustin Hoffman's Children Enter the Bathroom" | 2:47 |
| 16. | "Dustin Hoffman's Children Don't Enter the Bathroom" | 3:50 |
| Total length: | 41:59 | |
gollark: Why should your personal preferences affect what *everyone* gets to do?
gollark: Basically, with large groups, you can pull up many, many examples of single people doing bad things, even if the rate of them doing bad things is the same or lower than for other groups.
gollark: Are you aware of "chinese robber fallacy"?
gollark: You are obviously not guaranteed to do a good job just because of being an opposite-gendered pair.
gollark: How can you prove *anyone* is a good parent?
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.