Synchronised swimming at the 2013 World Aquatics Championships – Solo technical routine
The solo technical routine competition at 2013 World Aquatics Championships was held on July 20 with the preliminary round in the morning and the final in the evening session.[1]
Solo technical routine at the Synchronised swimming at the 2013 World Aquatics Championships | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dates | 20 July | |||||||||
Competitors | 35 from 35 nations | |||||||||
Winning points | 96.800 | |||||||||
Medalists | ||||||||||
|
2013 FINA World Championships | ||
---|---|---|
Diving | ||
Individual | ||
1 m | men | women |
3 m | men | women |
10 m | men | women |
Synchronised | ||
3 m | men | women |
10 m | men | women |
High diving | ||
20 m | women | |
27 m | men | |
Open water swimming | ||
Single | ||
5 km | men | women |
10 km | men | women |
25 km | men | women |
Team | ||
5 km | mixed | |
Swimming | ||
Freestyle | ||
50 m | men | women |
100 m | men | women |
200 m | men | women |
400 m | men | women |
800 m | men | women |
1500 m | men | women |
Backstroke | ||
50 m | men | women |
100 m | men | women |
200 m | men | women |
Breaststroke | ||
50 m | men | women |
100 m | men | women |
200 m | men | women |
Butterfly | ||
50 m | men | women |
100 m | men | women |
200 m | men | women |
Individual medley | ||
200 m | men | women |
400 m | men | women |
Freestyle relay | ||
4×100 m | men | women |
4×200 m | men | women |
Medley relay | ||
4×100 m | men | women |
Synchronised swimming | ||
Solo | ||
Technical | women | |
Free | women | |
Duet | ||
Technical | women | |
Free | women | |
Team | ||
Technical | women | |
Free | women | |
Combination | women | |
Water polo | ||
Tournament | men | women |
Results
The preliminary round was held at 09:00[2] and the final at 19:00.[3]
Green denotes finalists
Rank | Swimmer | Nationality | Preliminary | Final | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Points | Rank | Points | Rank | |||
![]() |
Svetlana Romashina | ![]() |
96.200 | 1 | 96.800 | 1 |
![]() |
Huang Xuechen | ![]() |
95.100 | 2 | 95.500 | 2 |
![]() |
Ona Carbonell | ![]() |
94.200 | 3 | 94.400 | 3 |
4 | Anna Voloshyna | ![]() |
92.100 | 4 | 92.900 | 4 |
5 | Yukiko Inui | ![]() |
91.800 | 5 | 91.900 | 5 |
6 | Chloé Isaac | ![]() |
91.000 | 6 | 90.600 | 6 |
7 | Despoina Solomou | ![]() |
88.500 | 7 | 89.600 | 7 |
8 | Linda Cerruti | ![]() |
88.400 | 8 | 89.200 | 8 |
9 | Jenna Randall | ![]() |
87.500 | 10 | 87.500 | 9 |
10 | Mary Killman | ![]() |
88.100 | 9 | 87.300 | 10 |
11 | Soňa Bernardová | ![]() |
84.900 | 11 | 85.200 | 11 |
12 | Kang Un-Ha | ![]() |
84.400 | 12 | 85.100 | 12 |
13 | Margot de Graaf | ![]() |
83.400 | 13 | 83.400 | 13 |
14 | Pamela Fischer | ![]() |
83.400 | 13 | 82.700 | 14 |
15 | Nadine Brandl | ![]() |
82.100 | 15 | 81.900 | 15 |
16 | Kyra Felßner | ![]() |
79.100 | 16 | 80.100 | 16 |
17 | Etel Sánchez | ![]() |
78.900 | 17 | ||
18 | Jana Labáthová | ![]() |
78.800 | 18 | ||
19 | Reem Abdalazem | ![]() |
77.200 | 19 | ||
20 | Jennifer Cerquera | ![]() |
77.100 | 20 | ||
21 | Iryna Limanouskaya | ![]() |
76.800 | 21 | ||
22 | Greisy Gomez | ![]() |
75.100 | 22 | ||
22 | Malin Gerdin | ![]() |
75.100 | 22 | ||
24 | Kalina Yordanova | ![]() |
74.900 | 24 | ||
25 | Anastasiya Ruzmetova | ![]() |
74.000 | 25 | ||
26 | Ana Cekić | ![]() |
71.500 | 26 | ||
26 | Anouk Eman | ![]() |
71.500 | 26 | ||
28 | Violeta Mitinian | ![]() |
71.300 | 28 | ||
29 | Kirstin Anderson | ![]() |
69.900 | 29 | ||
30 | Lim Hyun-Ji | ![]() |
69.200 | 30 | ||
31 | Au Ieong Sin Ieng | ![]() |
67.200 | 31 | ||
32 | Kerry Beth Norden | ![]() |
62.600 | 32 | ||
32 | Jennifer Quintana | ![]() |
62.600 | 32 | ||
34 | Claudia Megawati Suyanto | ![]() |
61.200 | 34 | ||
35 | Dhitaya Tanabunsombat | ![]() |
55.200 | 35 |
gollark: Inheritance is bad anyway.
gollark: Some function which renders text on a given point on the screen...?
gollark: If you do actually want read/writable data it's probably best to use a serialization format other than Lua code, though textutils.serialise does actually almost output valid Lua.
gollark: <@228280688359636992> You can definitely do that. I prefer the JSON approach since it can be automatically generated *from* your data.
gollark: I think `encode` to convert data to JSON and `decode` to convert JSON to data.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.