Sword and Stone
"Sword and Stone" is a single released by the German band Bonfire. It was recorded during the session recordings for their third studio album, Point Blank. This song appeared in the Wes Craven movie, Shocker. Included on the single are songs by Saraya and Voodoo X. "Sword and Stone" was written by Paul Stanley and Bruce Kulick of KISS together with producer Desmond Child and was originally a demo for the KISS album Crazy Nights.
| "Sword and Stone" | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | ||||
| Single by Bonfire | ||||
| Released | 1989 | |||
| Genre | Hard rock | |||
| Length | 14:09 | |||
| Label | EMI | |||
| Songwriter(s) | Paul Stanley, Bruce Kulick, Desmond Child | |||
| Producer(s) | Desmond Child, Max Norman | |||
| Bonfire singles chronology | ||||
| ||||
Track listing
| No. | Title | Writer(s) | Length |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | "Sword and Stone" | Desmond Child, Paul Stanley, Bruce Kulick | 3:59 |
| 2. | "Timeless Love (by Saraya)" | Desmond Child | 4:10 |
| 3. | "The Awakening (by Voodoo X)" | Jean Beauvoir, Jörn-Uwe Fahrenkrog-Petersen, Tommy Lafferty | 6:00 |
Band members
- Claus Lessmann - lead vocals
- Angel Schleifer - guitar
- Joerg Deisinger - bass
- Edgar Patrik - drums
Covers
Paul Dean (guitarist for Loverboy) released a version of the song in 1989, which appears on his solo album, Hard Core.
gollark: Apparently, if you integrate the "characteristic function of the rational numbers" (1 if rational, 0 otherwise) from 0 to 1, you will attain 1, because x is always rational (because b - a is 1, and all the partitions are the same size), even though it should be 0.
gollark: For another thing, as I found out while reading a complaint by mathematicians about the use of Riemann integrals over gauge integrals, if you always take the point to "sample" as the left/right/center of each partition *and* the thing is evenly divided up into partitions, it's actually wrong in some circumstances.
gollark: For one thing, the sum operator is very bee there because it does not appear to be counting integers.
gollark: It's wrong and abuse-of-notationy however.
gollark: And this isn't even *used anywhere* except that one or two of the integration questions use this as an extra layer of indirection.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.