Stumbledown Romancer
Stumbledown Romancer is a 1998 studio album by James Dewar. While having been completed in the late 1970s, it was never released until 1998 (Chrysalis), and even then it only had a limited release. Due to its rare nature, it has been sought after by collectors.
| Stumbledown Romancer | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Studio album by | |
| Released | 1998 |
| Recorded | 1970s |
| Length | 38:15 |
| Label | Chrysalis |
Track listing
- "Out of Time" (Mick Jagger, Keith Richards)
- "Goodbye Love" (Andy McMaster)
- "Stumbledown Romancer" (Dewar, Matthew Fisher)
- "Bright Lights" (Andy McMaster)
- "Hosanna" (Dewar, Matthew Fisher)
- "Love's Melody" (Andrew McMaster)
- "Sands of Time" (Dewar, Robin Trower)
- "Heartbeat" (Norman Petty)
- "Lay Down the Night" (Andrew McMaster)
- "Dance with Me" (Jerry Leiber, Mike Stoller)
- "Nature Child" (Dewar, Matthew Fisher)
Personnel
- James Dewar 7, 11
- David Hayes 1, 8, 10
- Alan Jones 2, 4, 6, 9
- Paul Westwood 3
- Mo Foster 5
- Dahoud Shar 1, 8, 10
- Peter Van Hooke 2, 6, 9
- Dave Mattacks 3, 4, 7
- Graham Jarvis 5
- Bill Lordan 11
- James Dewar 2, 4, 6, 7
- John Platania 1, 8
- Martin Jenner 5
Guitar acoustic:
- James Dewar 7, 10
- Matthew Fisher 1, 3, 5, 10
- Matthew Fisher 1, 5
- Andy McMaster 2, 4, 6, 9
Electric Piano:
- Matthew Fisher 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11
Fender Piano:
- John Allair 8, 10
Synthesised strings / brass:
- Matthew Fisher 3, 4, 6, 10, 11
- Matthew Fisher 2, 5, 7, 9, 10
- James Dewar 1, 5
Vocal (lead):
- James Dewar All
Vocals (harmony):
- James Dewar 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9
gollark: I think most of them use "IPS" now, whatever that actually stands for, and have good viewing angles. My laptop screen was clearly minimal-budget and is "TN"-based, so the viewing angles are bad.
gollark: Also differently sized pixels, quite plausibly.
gollark: Your monitor and TV might use different panel technology.
gollark: No. Via confusing relativity things, light still goes at the same speed relative to you on the ship. You could happily walk around even closer to light speed, and to outside observers you'd just seem to get closer to light speed but never actually reach it. Something like that.
gollark: Anyway, this doesn't seem to... explain anything usefully? It seems like a retroactive justification for *why* stuff is the way it is, but in a way which doesn't seem amenable to making useful predictions, and is also extremely vague.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.