South Province (Western Australia)
South Province was an electoral province of the Legislative Council of Western Australia between 1900 and 1989. It elected three members between 1900 and 1965 and two members between 1965 and 1989.
Members
Three members (1900–1965) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Member 1 | Party | Term | Member 2 | Party | Term | Member 3 | Party | Term | |||
Thomas Brimage | None | 1900–1906 | John Glowrey | None | 1900–1904 | George Bellingham | None | 1900–1908 | |||
William Oats | None | 1904–1910 | |||||||||
John Glowrey | None | 1906–1910 | |||||||||
Sir John Kirwan | None | 1908–1910 | |||||||||
Independent | 1910–1912 | Jabez Dodd | Labor | 1910–1917 | Independent | 1910–1946 | |||||
James Cornell | Labor | 1912–1917 | |||||||||
Nat. Labor | 1917–1924 | Nat. Labor | 1917–1924 | ||||||||
Nationalist | 1924–1945 | Nationalist | 1924–1928 | ||||||||
George Rainsford | Nationalist | 1928 | |||||||||
Charles Williams | Labor | 1928–1948 | |||||||||
Liberal | 1945–1946 | ||||||||||
George Bennetts | Labor | 1946–1950 | |||||||||
Robert Boylen | Labor | 1947–1950 | |||||||||
John Cunningham | Liberal | 1948–1950 | |||||||||
Major reconstitution in 1950 – existing South Province members effectively swapped with existing South-East Province members. | |||||||||||
Jack Thomson | Country | 1950–1965 | Hugh Roche | Country | 1950–1960 | Anthony Loton | Country | 1950–1965 | |||
Sydney Thompson | Country | 1960–1965 |
Two members (1965–1989) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Member 1 | Party | Term | Member 2 | Party | Term | ||
Edward House | Country | 1965–1971 | Jack Thomson | Country | 1965–1974 | ||
David Wordsworth | Liberal | 1971–1989 | |||||
Thomas Knight | Liberal | 1974–1986 | |||||
John Caldwell | National | 1986–1989 |
gollark: Reduced privacy in return for more safety and stuff might be better if governments had a track record of, well, actually doing that sort of thing effectively.
gollark: I... see.
gollark: Invading people's privacy a lot allows you to get somewhat closer to "perfect enforcement".
gollark: Anyway, broadly speaking, governments *cannot* perfectly enforce their laws, and this is part of the reason they work generally somewhat okay. If they could *immediately* go from "government doesn't/does think you could do X" to "you can no longer do/not do X without punishment", we would likely have significantly less fair institutions.
gollark: The UK has some of the world's most ridiculously broad government surveillance laws.
References
- David Black (2014), The Western Australian Parliamentary Handbook (Twenty-Third Edition), pp. 221–222, 226
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.