Something That We Do

"Something That We Do" is a song recorded by American country music artist Clint Black and written by Black and Skip Ewing. It was released in August 1997 as the second single from Black's album Nothin' but the Taillights and peaked at number 2 on the U.S. Billboard Hot Country Singles & Tracks chart and number 4 on the Canadian RPM Country Tracks chart. It was voted song of the year by the Nashville Songwriters Association International.[1]

"Something That We Do"
Single by Clint Black
from the album Nothin' But the Taillights
ReleasedAugust 25, 1997
Recorded1997
GenreCountry
Length3:58
LabelRCA Nashville
Songwriter(s)Clint Black, Skip Ewing
Producer(s)James Stroud, Clint Black
Clint Black singles chronology
"Still Holding On"
(1997)
"Something That We Do"
(1997)
"Nothin' but the Taillights"
(1998)

Content

The song explores the complexities of romantic relationships and offers the simple truth that "Love isn't something that we're in/It's something that we do." It is sung in the key of G major and a slow tempo of 66 beats per minute. The guitar in the song is set to Open D tuning, with a capo on the fifth fret.[2]

Critical reception

Deborah Evans Price, of Billboard magazine reviewed the song favorably, saying that the song "has a powerful and poignant poetic tone that illuminates more about the nature of love and relationships in a few minutes than several books on the subject ever could." She goes on to call the song a "sweet, moving ballad." [3]

Music video

The music video was directed by Black with the help of Timothy White.

Charts

"Something That We Do" debuted at number 62 on the U.S. Billboard Hot Country Singles & Tracks for the week of August 30, 1997.

Chart (1997) Peak
position
Canada Country Tracks (RPM)[4] 3
US Billboard Hot 100[5] 67
US Hot Country Songs (Billboard)[6] 2

Year-end charts

Chart (1997) Position
Canada Country Tracks (RPM)[7] 89
US Country Songs (Billboard)[8] 75
gollark: On a related note, it annoys me a lot that Discord seem to want to appeal to "gamers"; I don't even know *which* gamers, honestly; with the weird phrasing they use in the UI.
gollark: If it was federated and open, people would be able to move off it more easily.
gollark: That would reduce their ability to data-mine this like crazy, which I assume is how they aim to monetize it eventually.
gollark: I've looked at XMPP, but I'm not sure if that works for chatroom-type things or just person/person messaging.
gollark: I would really prefer to be using some sort of open federated messaging service, but that would be more annoying for people to use I guess.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.